The 'dark evil' of racism

Why does the world continue to be 'plagued' by racism?

'Oh God the horror and the humanity'

What Monsters

Hateful demons out to deny us the blessings of diversity and race-mixing

Trust Them

"It's so evil"

'White Supremacism'

These white racists and anti-semites have the gall to say multiculturalism is bad, whites should be able to have nations for themselves, jewish power has a negative influence, and even that the Holocaust is a fraud.















Brown pride is ok

It's kosher for blacks, asians, hispanics, jews, and every other non-white race to take pride in their ethnicity and heritage, and to organize for the interests of their race.

NAACP, Negro College Fund, Congressional Hispanic Caucus, Jewish Defense League, Asian-only scholarships, etc....super.



















The idea of nations exclusively for whites is 'repugnant'

Only hateful bigots and racists talk about white people having nations exclusively for their people.














Nations exclusively for non-whites is acceptable

Whether is Israel for jews only, a Palestine for ethnic Palestinian Arabs, ethnic Kurds in Iraq fighting for independence, China for Chinese, or Mexico for Mexicans....the non-white races are allowed to have countries for their people.














E.g., Mohawk Indians evict non-Mohawks from their lands; Banned inter-racial marriages in 1981, Canadian courts uphold policy

The Canadian courts have ruled that "Mohawks can make any membership policy they deem necessary for their survival as a people". [1]

Well if it's kosher for Indians and other people to enact these policies for the preservation of their race and culture...then why can't whites/Europeans do the same?













White nations must be flooded with non-whites

Why is virtually every single white nation on the earth being forced to accept millions of foreign non-white immigrants?

Why doesn't China import 2-3 million black Africans every year? Why doesn't Mexico allow a million Asian immigrants into their country every year? Don't they want the blessings of diversity?














Wait, is there a...double standard?

Could it be that there is an anti-white agenda behind these blatant double standards?

The cultural and racial genocide of the white race is the goal

Are we to believe that whites in the 'democratic' Western nations are voting in favor of mass non-white immigration and their own cultural, racial, and national suicide?

If not, then who really controls their governments, media, and social institutions...and is forcing the 'multicultural' agenda upon them?

Jewish-controlled Media and Hollywood

You may have happened to notice that Hollywood and Western 'mainstream' media are completely dominated and controlled by jewish interests. Even jews admit it.

Through their stranglehold on the media, jews relentlessly push the multicultural, race-mixing agenda.












Jewish-controlled government

Through their control of international banking, elite jewish interests completely control the governments of the Western nations. Everyone from preeminent political scholars to White House press correspondent Helen Thomas has noted this fact. But, of course, they are demonized as "anti-semites" and "racists" in the jewish-controlled establishment media.















Billy Graham admits the truth

In a private conversation with President Richard Nixon, Billy Graham said that "Satanic left-wing jews totally control the media", and were destroying America. Graham even called the jews a "synagogue of Satan." [2]















The jewish "New World Order" conspiracy

The "New World Order" conspiracy is ultimately Satanic in origin, and aims to destroy white/Western Christian civilization, and conquer the world for Satan. The agenda pushes for 'global governance' and the erosion of national sovereignty.

Elite jews lead by the immensely powerful international jewish banking cabal are orchestrating this movement.

Jewish interests are behind the drive for a "New World Order" at every turn - eg, promoting feminism and homosexuality to destroy the family, promoting atheism to destroy belief in 'God', and orchestrating third world immigration to destroy white nations and to genocide the white race via race-mixing.












Jews are behind Communism/Marxism/Socialism

Communism is a jewish ideology, created and lead by jews from the very beginning. It is simply a vehicle for implementing their planned 'New World Order' and achieving world jewish domination.

The ideology calls for the overthrow of all existing governments and religions. It is a ruse promising a "socialist utopia for the working class", causing the masses to revolt and install the jewish leaders of the movement into power, whereby they can conduct their agenda of mass destruction, theft and genocide.













A 'Synagogue of Satan'

Yahushua the Messiah (aka 'Jesus') condemned the jews of his day in the strongest of terms, as literal "children of the devil", "full of hypocrisy and iniquity", and "children of hell" (Matthew 23).

Yahshua speaking to the jewish Pharisees:

"Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it." - John 8:44

"Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?" -Matthew 23:33


Revelation 2:9: "I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Judahites, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan."












But aren't we all brothers and sisters?

So Adam and Eve (or Noah) had white, black, indian, and asian children? That's what the Judeo-controlled Christian churches teach.

If you actually stop and think for a minute, it's actually biologically impossible for all the races to share a common ancestry.














The Bible actually teaches that all humans are not of common ancestry

The Bible -- when translated and interpreted correctly-- confirms the fact that Adam was not the first "human". There were other people on the earth before Adam was created. That is why Cain feared other people would kill him after he was banished, and how Cain was able to find a wife, have his own descendants, and build a city after being banished from Adam & Eve and their descendants.

Whom, then, are the descendants of Adam and Eve? The evidence strongly indicates that it is the white race. The word "Adam" in the Hebrew is "aw-dam'", which means "to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy". See for yourself in Strong's Hebrew Lexicon here:

Strong's Hebrew Lexicon Search Results Result of search for "Adam": 119 'adam aw-dam' to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy:--be (dyed, made) red (ruddy).

Race-mixing is a sin

The sixth commandment against "adultery" includes prohibition against corruption of the bloodline by intermarrying/mixing with foreign races.

YHWH (aka 'God') specifically commanded the Israelites to practice racial segregation, and forbid race-mixing.

Here are just a few scriptures on this:

Ezra 9:2 "For they have taken of their daughters for themselves, and for their sons: so that the HOLY SEED have MIXED themselves with the people of those lands: yea, the hand of the princes and rulers hath been chief in this TRESPASS."


Hosea 5:7 "They have dealt treacherously against YAHWEH: for they have begotten STRANGE children:"

Note: The word "strange" from Hosea 5:7 is from the Hebrew word "zuwr", meaning "a foreigner".


Deuteronomy 23:2: "A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord, even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the Lord."

Note: The word "bastard" above in Deuteronomy 23:2 is from the Hebrew word "mamzer", which is defined as "a mongrel" or person of mixed-race.















The "jews" are NOT Israelites

Modern-day so-called "jews" actually descended from tribes of people known as the Edomites and the Khazars, a Mongolian-Turkish people from modern-day southern Russia who converted to Judaism in the 8th or 9th century A.D. Jewish researcher Arthur Koestler admitted this in his 1976 book "The Thirteenth Tribe", which was based largely on the earlier work "The history of the Jewish Khazars" by D.M. Dunlop (1967).

These Khazars were, in fact, actually descended from the Edomites, originially from the area south of the Dead Sea near the land of Israel.

The Edomites are the descendants of Esau, Jacob/Israel's brother.














The True Israelites

The White Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, and kindred peoples are the true descendants of the Israelites.

The couterfeit "Israelite" jews are intent on destroying the real descendants of the Israelites.
















God hates the Edomite "jews" - Promises their future destruction in a real 'Holocaust'

Malachi 1: 3-4: "And I hated Esau, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste for the dragons of the wilderness. Whereas Edom saith, We are impoverished, but we will return and build the desolate places; thus saith the LORD of hosts, They shall build, but I will throw down; and they shall call them, The border of wickedness, and, The people against whom the LORD hath indignation for ever."

Obadiah 1:18: "And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stubble, and they shall kindle in them, and devour them; and there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau; for the LORD hath spoken it."














The Holocaust™ Canard

An absurd jewish fairytale, complete with the sacred never-changing 6 million number, ridiculous false atrocity fairytales of soap, lampshades and shrunken heads made of jews, and gassing people to death with bug spray in delousing chambers.

Yes, the Germans put many jews (and non-jews) in camps, but these camps were work camps, not "extermination" camps. There was no plan by Germany to "exterminate all the jews". Those who died in the camps died overwhelmingly from typhus and other diseases due to the breakdown in conditions inside Germany and Poland due to the war. Nowhere near 6 million jews died in the camps. Records show only tens of thousands of jews (and non-jews) died in all of the German camps.

The jews tried this swindle before WWII, alleging a "Holocaust" of "6 million jews" occured in 1906, 1919, and 1921.

The Holocaust lie is a desperate attempt to prevent the real holocaust that 'God' has prepared for them. It is critical to the jewish NWO conspiracy as it acts to prevent criticism and opposition to elite jewry and their wicked agenda.
















Kosher Controlled Opposition

In order to further deter whites from adopting 'racialist' ideals, jews have created and infiltrated 'white nationalist' organizations. They intentionally direct (and then portray in their controlled media) these organizations to appear as foolish and 'evil' as possible. Then the jewish-controlled media uses these clowns to demonize and ridicule by association all whites who stand in opposition to the 'multiculturalist' race-mixing agenda.

As communist jew Lenin stated, "the best way to control the opposition is to lead it."

Jews actually funded and created the German Nazi party. Through jewish groups like the ADL and SPLC, they fund and create the neo-Nazi groups, and infiltrate and control similar groups, including the KKK.

The myth of the Holocaust, and the jewish-controlled African slave industry of the past add to the mental conditioning.














Jews Controlled African Slave Trade

Though little known, it is a well-documented historical fact that jews dominated and controlled the trans-Atlantic African slave trade of the 15th-19th centuries.

This historical reality has been researched and documented by both jewish and black scholars.

So why should whites continue to cower away from "racism" and feel guilty for African slavery of the distant past, especially when it was controlled by jews?














The Architects of 'anti-Racist' Political Correctness

The powerful jewish ADL (and similar jewish organizations all over the world) are at the forefront of 'anti-racist' propaganda in all its forms.

The ADL and other 'anti-racist' jewish groups advise world leaders and lawmakers on such things as the adoption of "hate crime" and "holocaust denial" laws, and train police officers on "tolerance" and the identification of "right-wing extremists" and "domestic terrorists."

The ADL is an attack dog, and specializes in demonizing groups and ideas dangerous to the jewish NWO/Communist agenda - including Holocaust revisionists, white nationalists, anti-abortion activists, Constitutionalist/Patriot groups, and the militias.













What is a nation?

A "nation", in the true sense and as observed in history, is defined as a group of people with a common ethnicity and culture. A "nation" is not a multitude of races ruled by one particular government or enclosed by a geographic boundary. Multi-racial countries will not last so long as distinct racial groups exist, as eventually the nation will fracture, with one or more racial groups seeking "independence" and a nation for themselves.

So what is the Establishment's outcry against "racism" really all about?

The so-called "evil" of 'racism' is a construct of the Satanic jewish-controlled media and establishment used as a psychological weapon of war against whites - in order to enable the attempted destruction and genocide of the white nations and people via mass third world non-white immigration and miscegenation.

It's completely 'kosher' for jews, blacks, asians, and hispanics to express pride in their race, organize for their collective interests, and have nations exclusively for their people.

Why do the jews say that whites can't do these things? Because the Satanic Edomite/Khazar jews have targetted whites (the true Israelites) for cultural and racial genocide, in order destroy Western Christian Civilization and achieve world jewish domination.

Is "racism" one of the greatest "evils" in the world today?
	Yes, but only for white people. If jews, blacks, asians, or hispanics are 'racist', that's ok.
	No. 'God' commands racial segregation. Whites also have the right of nations for themselves.
pollcode.com free polls

Other Articles of Interest:

- YHWH Prohibits Race-Mixing and Commands Racial Purity and Segregation
- The myth of the "brotherhood" of humanity; Adam not the first man, but father of only the white race
- In Defense of White Supremacy - 1) It's simply an objective fact, and 2) Whites should owe allegiance to their own people above all others
- Biblical Christianity, YHWH the Almighty Creator, and Yahshua the Messiah are 'racist' & 'anti-Semitic' - Racism is divinely ordained
- Racial origin of the "Jews"; not Israelites, but descendants of Khazars, Edomites, Canaanites, Cain, and ultimately Satan
- Yahshua the Messiah was not a 'jew'
- The Mystery of the True Descendants of the Israelites - The White Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, and Kindred Peoples
- Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax
- Adolf Hitler - A puppet of International Jewry tasked with the destruction of Germany
- Communist Genocide in Soviet Union - Jewish Bolsheviks Murder 60+ Million in Russia & Ukraine, 1917-1987
- The Horror of Anti-Semitism - Why Do People Hate the Jews?

"Uproar" over enforcement of laws against illegal immigration?

April 2010 - The Arizona state legislature and governor pass a law allowing local police to help in deporting illegal aliens. Polls show 70%+ of the Arizona citizenry support the law. [1]









90%+ of Americans Support a crackdown on illegal immigration. Where is the supposed "uproar"?



The only ones in "uproar" over enforcement of laws against illegal immigration are the Jewish Establishment, their communist lackeys, and illegal immigrant criminals








Jewish/Communist establishment media gives virtual 24/7 non-stop coverage and air time to small minority of criminal illegal aliens and open border proponents who oppose Arizona's new law










Is this really "news", and is this really a "mainstream" media? Or propaganda serving an agenda?



Do they care that soon virtually no one will be watching CNN/MSNBC/CBS, except to get a laugh?








What a "coincidence." We are blessed with pro-immigration rallies on May 1st, international day of communism...again

National Jewish groups oppose new tough anti-illegal immigration law in Arizona

Groups oppose Arizona immigration law

JTA
April 19, 2010

WASHINGTON (JTA) -- Three national Jewish groups urged Arizona's governor to veto a bill that would force local authorities to enforce federal immigration law.

If passed, the bill "would make state and local law enforcement officers' jobs nearly impossible, and would bring us further from, not closer to, the goal we all share of making our communities safer," said the letter sent Monday from the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, the American Jewish Committee and the Jewish Council for Public Affairs to Gov. Jan. Brewer, a Republican. "It would also cause hardship to countless Arizona residents -- U.S. citizens, legal immigrants, and undocumented immigrants alike -- who if this law is passed will live under a cloud of suspicion and fear."

The legislation, which becomes law unless Brewer vetoes it in the next five days, would require police to ask those suspected of being in the country illegally to produce documentation. It also would ban soliciting work from people on sidewalks if it slows traffic.

Brewer has said she has reservations about the bill, which would be the toughest such measure in the country.

Opponents are concerned that it could lead to racial profiling and inhibit undocumented workers from reporting crime.

http://www.jta.org/news/article/2010/04/19/1011661/groups-oppose-ariz-immigration-law

WWII Vets in despair - "This isn't the Britain we fought for" - Judaized multi-racial, 'politically correct' Britain "is not our country anymore"

"Our country has been given away to foreigners"

"Those who made the ultimate sacrifice in the war would now be turning in their graves"

No doubt the overwhelming majority of American vets share the same sentiment.

'This isn't the Britain we fought for,' say the 'unknown warriors' of WWII

By Tony Rennell
21st November 2009
Daily Mail

Sarah Robinson was just a teenager when World War II broke out.

She endured the Blitz, watching for fires during Luftwaffe air raids armed with a bucket of sand.

Often she would walk ten miles home from work in the blackout, with bombs falling around her.

As soon as she turned 18, she joined the Royal Navy to do her bit for the war effort.

Hers was a small part in a huge, history-making enterprise, and her contribution epitomises her generation's sense of service and sacrifice.

Nearly 400,000 Britons died. Millions more were scarred by the experience, physically and mentally.

But was it worth it? Her answer - and the answer of many of her contemporaries, now in their 80s and 90s - is a resounding No.

They despise what has become of the Britain they once fought to save. It's not our country any more, they say, in sorrow and anger.

Sarah harks back to the days when 'people kept the laws and were polite and courteous. We didn't have much money, but we were contented and happy.

'People whistled and sang. There was still the United Kingdom, our country, which we had fought for, our freedom, democracy. But where is it now?!'

The feelings of Sarah and others from this most selfless generation about the modern world have been recorded by a Tyneside writer, 33-year-old Nicholas Pringle.

Curious about his grandmother's generation and what they did in the war, he decided three years ago to send letters to local newspapers across the country asking for those who lived through the war to write to him with their experiences.

He rounded off his request with this question: 'Are you happy with how your country has turned out? What do you think your fallen comrades would have made of life in 21st-century Britain?'

What is extraordinary about the 150 replies he received, which he has now published as a book, is their vehement insistence that those who made the ultimate sacrifice in the war would now be turning in their graves.

There is the occasional bright spot - one veteran describes Britain as 'still the best country in the world' - but the overall tone is one of profound disillusionment.

'I sing no song for the once-proud country that spawned me,' wrote a sailor who fought the Japanese in the Far East, 'and I wonder why I ever tried.'

'My patriotism has gone out of the window,' said another ex-serviceman.

In the Mail this week, Gordon Brown wrote about 'our debt of dignity to the war generation'.

But the truth that emerges from these letters is that the survivors of that war generation have nothing but contempt for his government.

They feel, in a word that leaps out time and time again, 'betrayed'.

New Labour, said one ex-commando who took part in the disastrous Dieppe raid in which 4,000 men were lost, was 'more of a shambles than some of the actions I was in during the war, and that's saying something!'

He added: 'Those comrades of mine who never made it back would be appalled if they could see the world as it is today.

'They would wonder what happened to the Brave New World they fought so damned hard for.'

Nor can David Cameron take any comfort from the elderly.

His 'hug a hoodie' advice was scorned by a generation of brave men and women now too scared, they say, to leave their homes at night.

Immigration tops the list of complaints.

'People come here, get everything they ask, for free, laughing at our expense,' was a typical observation.

'We old people struggle on pensions, not knowing how to make ends meet. If I had my time again, would we fight as before? Need you ask?'

Many writers are bewildered and overwhelmed by a multicultural Britain that, they say bitterly, they were never consulted about nor feel comfortable with.

'Our country has been given away to foreigners while we, the generation who fought for freedom, are having to sell our homes for care and are being refused medical services because incomers come first.'

Her words may be offensive to many - and rightly so - but Sarah Robinson defiantly states: 'We are affronted by the appearance of Muslim and Sikh costumes on our streets.'

But then political correctness is another thing they take strong issue with, along with politicians generally - 'liars, incompetents and self-aggrandising charlatans' (with the revealing exception of Enoch Powell).

The loss of British sovereignty to the European Union caused almost as much distress. 'Nearly all veterans want Britain to leave the EU,' wrote one.

Frank, a merchant navy sailor, thought of those who gave their lives 'for King and country', only for Britain to become 'an offshore island of a Europe where France and Germany hold sway. Ironic, isn't it?'

As a group, they feel furious at not being able to speak their minds.

They see the lack of debate and the damning of dissenters as racists or Little Englanders as deeply upsetting affronts to freedom of speech.

'Our British culture is draining away at an ever increasing pace,' wrote an ex-Durham Light Infantryman, 'and we are almost forbidden to make any comment.'

A widow from Solihull blamed the Thatcher years 'when we started to lose all our industry and profit became the only aim in life'.

Her husband, a veteran of Dunkirk and Burma, died a disappointed man, believing that his seven years in the Army were wasted.

'It is 18 years since I lost him and as I look around parts of Birmingham today you would never know you were in England,' she wrote.

'He would have hated it. He also disliked the immoral way things are going. I don't think people are really happy now, for all the modern, easy-living conveniences.

'I disagree with same-sex marriages, schoolgirl mothers, rubbish TV programmes, so-called celebrities and, most of all, unlimited immigration.

'I am very unhappy about the way this country is being transformed. I go nowhere after dark. I don't even answer my doorbell then.'

A Desert Rat who battled his way through El Alamein, Sicily, Italy and Greece was in despair.

'This is not the country I fought for. Political correctness, lack of discipline, compensation madness, uncontrolled immigration - the "do-gooders" have a lot to answer for.

'If you see youngsters doing something they shouldn't and you say anything, you just get a mouthful of foul language.'

Undoubtedly, some of the complaints are 'grumpy old man' gripes, as the veterans themselves recognise - from chewing gum on pavements and motorists using mobile phones to the march of computerisation ('why can't I just go to the station and buy a railway ticket?') and the dearth of pop music tunes you can hum.

But it is the fundamental change in society's values which they find hardest to come to terms with.

Bring back birching and hanging, the sanctions they grew up with, they say. Put more bobbies back on the beat.

'We were rigidly taught good manners and respect for older people,' said a wartime WAAF, 'but the nanny state has ruined all that. Television programmes are full of violence and obscene language.

This Land of Hope and Glory is in reality a land of yobs, drug addicts, drunkard youths and teenage mothers who think they are owed all for nothing.'

Aged 85, she has little wish to go on living.

For others, the strength of character that got them through the war is still helping them to survive the disappointments of peacetime.

A crofter's son from Scotland who served on the Arctic convoys taking supplies to Russia found the immediate post-war years hard.

'In those days we had no welfare support from any source. It was as though we had served our country to the full and were then forgotten.

'However, we were very resilient and determined to make a go of it, and many of us, including myself, succeeded.

'How times have changed now, with the countless many clamouring to get welfare benefits for the asking.'

A medic who made it through Dunkirk and D-Day thought the fallen would be appalled by the lack of manners in modern life and the worship of celebrities, plus 'the patent dishonesty of politicians'.

Another common issue was their bemusement at the idea anyone could live in constant debt.

'We were brought up to believe that if you hadn't the money, you waited till you had!' one wrote.

However, this particular man was unusual among the 150 respondents in believing that there were many pluses to modern life.

He even had a good word to say about the European Union and felt it would appeal to the fallen 'if only for maintaining the peace in Europe over the past 60 years or so'.

He praised the breaking down of class barriers in Britain compared with the years when he was young and 'infinitely' increased prosperity.

'More clothes, cars, holidays abroad, home ownership. As a young teacher in the Fifties I had one suit (Army issue) and the luxury of a sports jacket and flannels at the weekend.

'Education has made vast progress. In my early days I taught classes of 50. Only five per cent of children went on to further education compared with over 40 per cent today.

'The emancipation of women has also been a huge plus, with the introduction of the Pill a large contributor. Before the war, women teachers were dismissed as soon as they married.'

A Land Girl who laboured on farms in Devon during the war agreed that 'we have so much to be grateful for.

'So much progress has been made to transform the standard of living since the war.'

But she could not help asking whether people were any happier.

She bemoaned the advent of the Pill and the collapse of sexual morality. 'In my day, drugs were unknown, families remained together, divorce was a rarity and children felt secure.

'Were our sacrifices made so hooligans may run wild? And aggressive behaviour be accepted as the norm by TV interviewers and society in general?'

A captain with a Military Cross for valour under fire thought Britain was still the best country in the world.

The 'occasional' sight of parents and nicely dressed children gave an otherwise gloomy veteran of the Italian campaign a sense that 'what we did all those years ago was not for nothing'.

A grandmother, the widow of a Royal Marine who took part in the D-Day landings, felt the National Health Service had descended into chaos but was grateful for a pensioner's free television licence, 'which brings art, travel and animals into my home', and being able to text her grandchildren.

Just being alive was a bonus. 'Although I hate what is happening to our country, I am so happy to be here, grumbling, but remembering better, happier days,' she wrote.

But one of the bitterest complaints of the veterans was that their trenchant views on many of the matters aired here were constantly ignored by those in authority.

Their letters of complaint to councillors and MPs went unanswered.

It was as if they didn't matter, except when wheeled out for the rituals of Remembrance Day.

'Why do so many of the British public confuse sentimentality with genuine concern for others?' asked one letter-writer.

But this was the generation honoured in Remembrance services last weekend, showered with gratitude and teary-eyed sentiments as their dwindling ranks marched unsteadily past the Cenotaph and other war memorials throughout the UK.

The overall impression any reader of the letters gets is that this generation feel unheard, unwanted and unimportant.

This remarkable collection of their thoughts should give us pause for reflection.

They may be deemed beyond their sell-by date (and many of their views may seem unacceptable, flouting every sort of 'ism' imaginable) but, by their deeds of 60-plus years ago, they have won the right to be listened to and their disillusionment noted with respect.

In one letter in this collection, an RAF mechanic quoted a poem about comrades who fell in battle: 'I mourned them then, But now surviving in a world, Indifferent to their hopes and dreams, I grieve more for the living.'

Kevin MacDonald on the History of Jews and Immigration Policy in the United States - Opening the Sewer Lines

via Radio Werewolf

Destruction of White Nations via Mass Non-White Immigration and Jewish Infiltration & Subversion Will Continue Until Holohoax Lie is Shredded

Prime Objective of the Holocaust™ Hoax - Destroy White Racialism/Nationalism by association with the "monstrously evil" Nazis; Neuter Opposition to Mass Non-white Immigration into White Nations

"Many countries of the Anglo-Saxon world, notably the United States and Britain, are today facing the gravest danger in their history, the danger poised by the alien races in their midst. Unless something is done in America to halt the immigration and assimilation of Africans and Asians into their country, we are faced in the near future, quite apart from the bloodshed of racial conflict, with the biological alteration and destruction of the American people as they have existed here since we have been a nation.

In short, we are threatened with the irrecoverable loss of our European culture and racial heritage. But what happens if a man dares to speak of the race problem, of its biological and political implications? He is branded as that most heinous of creatures, a “racialist.” And what is racialism, of course, but the very hallmark of the Nazi. They (So everyone is told, anyway) murdered Six Mission Jews because of racialism, so it must be a very evil thing indeed. When Enoch Powell drew attention to the dangers posed by colored immigration into Britain in one of his early speeches, a certain prominent Socialist raised the specter of Dachau and Auschwitz to silence his presumption.

Thus any rational discussion of the problems of Race and the effort to preserve racial integrity is effectively discouraged. No one could have anything but admiration for the way in which the jews have sought to preserve their identity through so many centuries, and continue to do so today. In this effort they have frankly been assisted by the story of the Six Million, which, almost like a religious myth, has stressed the need for greater Jewish racial solidarity. Unfortunately, it has worked in quite the opposite way for all other peoples, rendering them impotent in the struggle for self-preservation."

source

Germany, under the ostensible goals of the National Socialists, embodied the worst nightmare of Jewry: the Germanic/Anglo-Saxon people uniting against the subversive influence of alien Jews, and recognizing that the survival of the Germanic/Anglo-Saxon people absolutely requires racial separation and racially homogeneous white nations.

From the perspective of Jewry, what better way to attempt to destroy these "dangerous" ideals (and advance the destruction of the white race), than to closely associate these ideas with the "most extreme evil in the history of the world"? Hence the Holohoax...and the demonization and smear by association of those who dare to bring up the two critical issues of subversive Jewish power and the problem of mass non-white immigration.

Boston radio talk show host suspended for calling Mexican immigrants "primitives, leeches, and exporters of women with mustaches and VD"

Severin suspended for comments about Mexican immigrants

By David Abel
Boston Globe
May 1, 2009

Jay Severin, the fiery right wing talk show host on Boston's WTKK-FM radio station, was suspended yesterday after calling Mexican immigrants "criminaliens," "primitives," "leeches," and exporters of "women with mustaches and VD," among other incendiary comments.

[...]

In one of his broadcasts this week, Severin said: "So now, in addition to venereal disease and the other leading exports of Mexico - women with mustaches and VD - now we have swine flu."

Later, he described Mexicans as "the world's lowest of primitives."

"When we are the magnet for primitives around the world - and it's not the primitives' fault by the way, I'm not blaming them for being primitives - I'm merely observing they're primitive," he said.

He added that Mexicans are destroying schools and hospitals in the United States. He also criticized their hygiene.

"It's millions of leeches from a primitive country come here to leech off you and, with it, they are ruining the schools, the hospitals, and a lot of life in America," he said.

He added: "We should be, if anything, surprised that Mexico has not visited upon us poxes of more various and serious types already, considering the number of criminaliens already here."

[...]

Jews' "Southern Poverty Law Center": Discrimination against Latrinos in the South constitutes a "civil rights crisis" - Amnesty is only solution

SPLC Report Finds Low-Income Latinos in South Targeted for Abuse, Discrimination

Low-income Latino immigrants in the South are routinely the targets of wage theft, racial profiling and other abuses driven by an anti-immigrant climate that harms all Latinos regardless of their immigration status, according to a report released today by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

The report — Under Siege: Life for Low-Income Latinos in the South — documents the experiences of Latino immigrants who face increasing hostility as they fill low-wage jobs in Southern states that had few Latino residents until recent years.

"This report documents the human toll of failed policies that relegate millions of people to an underground economy, where they are beyond the protection of the law," said Mary Bauer, author of the report and director of the SPLC's Immigrant Justice Project. "Workplace abuses and racial profiling are rampant in the South."

Under Siege is based on a survey of 500 low-income Latinos — including legal residents, undocumented immigrants and U.S. citizens — at five locations in the South. The locations were Nashville, Charlotte, New Orleans, rural southern Georgia, and several towns and cities in northern Alabama.

The survey findings, coupled with accounts from in-depth interviews, depict a region where Latinos are routinely cheated out of wages by employers and denied basic health and safety protections. They are racially profiled by overzealous law enforcement agents and victimized by criminals who know they are reluctant to report crime to these same authorities. Even legal residents and U.S. citizens of Latino descent said racial profiling, bigotry and other forms of discrimination are staples of their daily lives.

A number of immigrants in the survey described the South as a "war zone."

"The assumption is that every Latino possibly is undocumented," Angeles Ortega-Moore, an immigrant advocate in North Carolina, told SPLC researchers. "So it [discrimination] has spread over into the legal population."

Maria, who came to Tennessee from Colombia, told SPLC researchers her immigration papers are in order, but she is still afraid of being stopped by the police. "You never know when you will come across a racist police officer," she says in the report.

Discrimination against Latinos in the region constitutes a civil rights crisis that must be addressed, the SPLC report says. The report concludes that comprehensive immigration reform — including a workable path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants — is the only realistic, fair and humane solution.

Reform legislation must be coupled with strong enforcement of labor and civil rights protections. This would make crime victims and communities safer, curb racial profiling and other abuses, and better protect the wages and working conditions of all workers, according to the report.

"We're talking about a matter of basic human rights here," said SPLC President Richard Cohen. "By allowing this cycle of abuse and discrimination to continue, we're creating an underclass of people who are invisible to justice and undermining our country's fundamental ideals."

Southern Poverty Law Center

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) is an American non-profit legal organization, internationally known for its tolerance education programs, its legal victories against white supremacists and its tracking of organizations it calls hate groups.

The SPLC is based in Montgomery, Alabama, in the Southern United States. It was founded in 1971 by Morris (Seligman) Dees and Joseph J. Levin Jr. as a civil rights law firm.

Current SPLC President and chief executive officer Richard Cohen

DHS Chief and Raging Bull Dyke Marxist Crypto-Jew Napolitano: Illegal Immigration Is Not a Crime

Newsmax
Wednesday, April 22, 2009

By: Jim Meyers

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano stunned many listeners during an appearance on CNN when she asserted that illegal immigration is really not a crime.

In an interview with CNN’s John King last week, Napolitano discussed Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Ariz., a strict enforcer of immigration laws who says he wants illegal aliens to be prosecuted and jailed.

King said: “A lot of Democrats in Congress want you to investigate him. They think he is over the line. He says he is just enforcing the law and the problem is the federal government.”

Napolitano responded: “Sheriff Joe … knows that there aren’t enough law enforcement officers, courtrooms or jail cells in the world to do what he is saying.

“What we have to do is target the real evil-doers in this business, the employers who consistently hire illegal labor, the human traffickers who are exploiting human misery.

“And yes, when we find illegal workers, yes, appropriate action, some of which is criminal, most of that is civil, because crossing the border is not a crime per se. It is civil. But anyway, going after those as well.”

The fact is, crossing the border without authorization is a crime. The statute reads: “Any alien who enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers . . . shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both.”

Obama Plans to Push Amnesty For Illegals This Year Despite Terrible Economy

Obama to Push Immigration Bill as One Priority

By JULIA PRESTON
NY Times
Published: April 8, 2009

While acknowledging that the recession makes the political battle more difficult, President Obama plans to begin addressing the country’s immigration system this year, including looking for a path for illegal immigrants to become legal, a senior administration official said on Wednesday.

Mr. Obama will frame the new effort — likely to rouse passions on all sides of the highly divisive issue — as “policy reform that controls immigration and makes it an orderly system,” said the official, Cecilia Muñoz, deputy assistant to the president and director of intergovernmental affairs in the White House.

Mr. Obama plans to speak publicly about the issue in May, administration officials said, and over the summer he will convene working groups, including lawmakers from both parties and a range of immigration groups, to begin discussing possible legislation for as early as this fall.

Some White House officials said that immigration would not take precedence over the health care and energy proposals that Mr. Obama has identified as priorities. But the timetable is consistent with pledges Mr. Obama made to Hispanic groups in last year’s campaign.

He said then that comprehensive immigration legislation, including a plan to make legal status possible for an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants, would be a priority in his first year in office. Latino voters turned out strongly for Mr. Obama in the election.

“He intends to start the debate this year,” Ms. Muñoz said.

But with the economy seriously ailing, advocates on different sides of the debate said that immigration could become a polarizing issue for Mr. Obama in a year when he has many other major battles to fight.

Opponents, mainly Republicans, say they will seek to mobilize popular outrage against any effort to legalize unauthorized immigrant workers while so many Americans are out of jobs.

Democratic legislative aides said that opening a full-fledged debate this year on immigration, particularly with health care as a looming priority, could weigh down the president’s domestic agenda.

Debate is still under way among administration officials about the precise timing and strategy. For example, it is unclear who will take up the Obama initiative in Congress.

[...]

Racial double standard on illegal immigrants in the United States - Obama to hunt down 3,000 Irish illegals

Obama and his Jewish masters will move heaven and earth to round up a measly 3,000 Irish illegal immigrants. Meanwhile, they aid and abet the invasion of 25-30+ MILLION illegal hispanics, and are pissing themselves to give them amnesty.

Obama to tackle illegal immigrants from Ireland

By Noel McAdam | Belfast Telegraph | Wednesday, 1 April 2009

The majority of “undocumented Irish” young people living illegally in America come from Fermanagh and Tyrone, the Assembly had been told.


But new President Barack Obama intends to tackle the problem, according to Deputy First Minister Martin McGuinness.

Reporting on his recent week-long trip to the US, Mr McGuinness said the issue came up constantly.

There is an estimated 2,500 to 3,000 illegal Irish in the US, with the majority coming from Fermanagh and Tyrone.

Mr McGuinness said: “The issue of the undocumented Irish came up consistently and persistently at many of the engagements in which we were involved.

“There is no doubt that it is a matter with which the new Administration will grapple.

“It is something that we would like to see resolved, because of the obvious pain and difficulty that it imposes, not just on people in the United States — whether from Derry, Fermanagh, Tyrone, Belfast, Dublin, Mayo or Kerry — but also because family difficulties occur, such as people dying,” the deputy First Minister added.

“Hopefully, the new Administration will find a solution sooner rather than later.”

More than three-quarters of Britons want to see jobless immigrants forced to leave UK

Daily Mail | 16th March 2009

More than three-quarters of Britons believe jobless immigrants should be asked to leave the UK, according to a new poll.

The finding will raise fears that the far-Right BNP could prosper in the recession as unemployment rises [fears that the BNP could prosper?...as if the BNP is not a legitimate party, or is it some kind of terrorist group. I guess the kosher and politically correct position is for all "mainstream" sources to exhibit blatant bias against the BNP]

In addition, more than half of the adults in Britain who took part in the FT/Harris survey opposed the right for citizens from other European Union countries to work here.

Outspoken immigration minister Phil Woolas admitted that the Government, despite years of tough talking on immigration, had yet to convince many voters that it had properly tightened Britain's borders. [Of course, but the more pertinent point based on this poll is that it has failed to convince the majority of Britons that the jewish 'multicultural' policy of largely Third World immigration to Britain is good for the country.]


'The poll figures are not a surprise, they are a concern, and in significant part they are because they[sic] public don't believe that the Government has got control,' he said.[They are primarily concerned, of course, because the people are mass rebelling against the jewish 'multicultural' policy, raising concern that they might actually rise up and actually do something to thwart the policy.]

[...]

Not For All

From Wheeler MacPherson of Caucasian Literary Review:

The immigration mess is on every "conservative's" mind, including the countless judeoxtians who don't dare speak the true thoughts sifting through their Scofielded and Pipered brains.

But if Americans properly understood to whom and for whom Christ's saving gospel is intended, we never would have exposed this country and her resources to the flood of hating aliens. America's skirts have been lifted, and now she is being raped by strangers.

The mindset and worldview that allows foreigners to slosh across our borders - foreigners who are not our fathers' posterity, who do not share our race, culture, language, or faith - can be at least partially traced back to a perverted view of the gospel. If we ignore the clear scriptural teaching that the Lord Jesus Christ came for His people, the lost sheep of the house of Israel, then we must accept the lie that passes for truth in virtually all Christian and judeoxtian circles today: that Christ came for all, that His plan for the new heavens and the new earth includes a multicultural stew of redeemed humanity.

The Bible does not teach any such thing.

But the majority of churchgoers today truly believe that it does. And this belief influences and colors their daily actions and their politics. If the gospel is for everyone...if the scriptures were written for humanity at large...then it follows that a country should seek to become a "melting pot," or "salad bowl," or "rainbow," or whatever good Stars 'n Stripers are calling this place that was once a nation. None will be turned away. None can be turned away, you see.

This ideology is the bastard child of the two parents, Ignorance and Apostasy. As long as the dominant voices in today's "Christianity" continue to teach that Christ came for those for whom He most certainly did not come, this bastard child will wax larger and stronger, and will grow in favor with antichrist and deracinated man. The foreigners who are sucking up public resources and defecating in once-beautiful communties are coming for our churches, too. Make no mistake about this. Even now, congregation after congregation pursues "outreach programs" designed to bring strangers into the pews, into fellowship...and ultimately, into miscegenistic "marriages" between their people and our people. The church's skirts have been lifted, and the stranger is titillated by what he has seen.

We must return to the holy scriptures, and read them in their purity, and pray for God's spirit to open our eyes. When by His grace and mercy we do open our eyes, we will see that His idea of evangelism is quite different from what we've been taught. And then we will begin to turn to our own kinfolk, and to be burdened for their salvation to the point of groaning in our souls.

But until that time, our Lord's words to the Edomite Jew Pharisees can be applied to our own people:

"You are in error," said Jesus in reply to them, "Through not comprehending the Scriptures, not yet the power of God."
[Matthew 22:29]

Related:

The Mystery of the True Descendants of the Israelites - The White Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, and Kindred Peoples

Yahweh Prohibits Race-Mixing and Commands Racial Purity and Segregation

The Atlantic announces the "end of white America" - Jews cheer the destruction of white western civilization

The End of White America?

The Election of Barack Obama is just the most startling manifestation of a larger trend: the gradual erosion of “whiteness” as the touchstone of what it means to be American. If the end of white America is a cultural and demographic inevitability, what will the new mainstream look like—and how will white Americans fit into it? What will it mean to be white when whiteness is no longer the norm? And will a post-white America be less racially divided—or more so?

by Hua Hsu
January/February 2009

"Civilization’s going to pieces,” he remarks. He is in polite company, gathered with friends around a bottle of wine in the late-afternoon sun, chatting and gossiping. “I’ve gotten to be a terrible pessimist about things. Have you read The Rise of the Colored Empires by this man Goddard?” They hadn’t. “Well, it’s a fine book, and everybody ought to read it. The idea is if we don’t look out the white race will be—will be utterly submerged. It’s all scientific stuff; it’s been proved.”

He is Tom Buchanan, a character in F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, a book that nearly everyone who passes through the American education system is compelled to read at least once. Although Gatsby doesn’t gloss as a book on racial anxiety—it’s too busy exploring a different set of anxieties entirely—Buchanan was hardly alone in feeling besieged. The book by “this man Goddard” had a real-world analogue: Lothrop Stoddard’s The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy, published in 1920, five years before Gatsby. Nine decades later, Stoddard’s polemic remains oddly engrossing. He refers to World War I as the “White Civil War” and laments the “cycle of ruin” that may result if the “white world” continues its infighting. The book features a series of foldout maps depicting the distribution of “color” throughout the world and warns, “Colored migration is a universal peril, menacing every part of the white world.”

As briefs for racial supremacy go, The Rising Tide of Color is eerily serene. Its tone is scholarly and gentlemanly, its hatred rationalized and, in Buchanan’s term, “scientific.” And the book was hardly a fringe phenomenon. It was published by Scribner, also Fitzgerald’s publisher, and Stoddard, who received a doctorate in history from Harvard, was a member of many professional academic associations. It was precisely the kind of book that a 1920s man of Buchanan’s profile—wealthy, Ivy League–educated, at once pretentious and intellectually insecure—might have been expected to bring up in casual conversation.

As white men of comfort and privilege living in an age of limited social mobility, of course, Stoddard and the Buchanans in his audience had nothing literal to fear. Their sense of dread hovered somewhere above the concerns of everyday life. It was linked less to any immediate danger to their class’s political and cultural power than to the perceived fraying of the fixed, monolithic identity of whiteness that sewed together the fortunes of the fair-skinned.

[...]

Full article

Jewish agenda for white genocide via 'multiculturalism' in overdrive - Sarkozy says French must interracially marry

The Engineer of DiversityFrom the desk of Tiberge on Mon, 2009-01-26 Recently Nicolas Sarkozy announced plans to pursue a vigorous policy of diversity and métissage. Concretely, this means giving preference to minorities in job hiring and prosecuting those who do not comply. In other words, affirmative action as a government policy from which none are exempt.In his message Sarkozy insisted that the French people must change, that there will be dire consequences if they don't, and that not to intermarry racially is bad for the survival of the country. Thus he amalgamated the concepts of preference for minorities in job hiring with that of the need for the French to intermarry racially.[...]

Full Article

Austrian 'far-right' legislator convicted of incitement for anti-Muslim statements

The Earth Times

Austrian far-right legislator convicted of anti-Muslim incitementThu, 22 Jan 2009 Vienna - Austrian far-right parliamentarian Susanne Winter was convicted Thursday of incitement because of her anti-Muslim statements, including the claim that Islam's prophet Mohammed was a paedophile. A court in Winter's home town of Graz also found the 51-year-old politician guilty of humiliating a religion. She was sentenced to a fine of 24,000 euros (31,000 dollars) euros and a suspended prison term of three months, Austrian news agency APA reported. The politician, who took a seat in parliament last fall for the Freedom Party (FPOe), made the anti-Islamic remarks in January 2008. She also proposed in a discussion with students that Muslim men should commit bestiality rather than making "indecent advances" on girls. The politician had pleaded innocent Thursday, claiming that she "did not want to insult anyone, but only to point out problems."The verdict is not yet legally binding. Winter's son Michael, a former youth leader in the Freedom Party, was convicted of the same crime last October. He had suggested in a newsletter that Turkish Muslims were in the habit of committing bestiality.

Dutch politician to be criminally prosecuted for "hate speech" for anti-Islam film

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7842344.stm

Islam film Dutch MP to be chargedWednesday, 21 January 2009A Dutch court has ordered prosecutors to put a right-wing politician on trial for making anti-Islamic statements. Freedom Party leader Geert Wilders made a controversial film last year equating Islam with violence and has likened the Koran to Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf. "In a democratic system, hate speech is considered so serious that it is in the general interest to... draw a clear line," the court in Amsterdam said. Mr Wilders said the judgement was an "attack on the freedom of expression". "Participation in the public debate has become a dangerous activity. If you give your opinion, you risk being prosecuted," he said. Not only he, but all Dutch citizens opposed to the "Islamisation" of their country would be on trial, Mr Wilders warned. "Who will stand up for our culture if I am silenced?" he added. [...]

14 Words Europe

Jew-controlled EUSSR tightens grip on racial dissent and freedom of speech, attempt to silence white nationalists

http://www.ejpress.org/article/32645

Commissioner applauds adoption of EU-wide framework to combat racism and xenophobia 05/Dec/2008 BRUSSELS (EJP)—“Racism and xenophobia have no place in Europe. Nor should it in any other part of the world. Dialogue and understanding should overcome hatred and provocation,” said Jacques Barrot, Vice-President of the European Commission.Barrot, who is in charge of justice, freedom and security within the EU executive body, welcomed the recent adoption by the EU Council of Justice and Interior Ministers of the so-called 'Framework Decision' on combating racism and xenophobia, seven years after it had first been presented by the European Commission. “I warmly welcome the introduction of severe and effective sanctions against racism and xenophobia that are direct violations of the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and the rule of law, principles upon which the European Union is founded and which are common to the Member State,” Barrot stated. The Framework Decision is considered as an important tool for sanctioning on the EU level racist and xenophobic crimes. EU member states will have two years to introduce severe and effective sanctions of at least between 1 and 3 years of imprisonment against those who intentionally publicly incite to violence or hatred by dissemination or distribution of tracts, pictures or other material, directed against persons defined by reference to race, colour, religion, descent or national or ethnic origin. Similar sanctions will apply to those who publicly condone, deny or grossly trivialise crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes as defined in the statute of the International Criminal Court and crimes defined by the Tribunal of Nüremberg. But EU ministers stopped short of specifically outlawing Holocaust denial. Germany, which chaired the EU in the first half of 2007 had pushed hard for a blanket ban on Holocaust denial as a moral obligation because of its Nazi past, but the bid has consistently fallen foul of free speech concerns. Countries like Britain, Ireland and the Scandinavian states resisted over the years unified legislation as a violation of civil liberties. According to a report of the European Network Against Racism (ENAR), extremism and racism are on the rise throughout Europe and racist political discourse is increasingly common in mainstream European politics. Data collected show that there is "evidence of public acceptance of racist crime and mistreatment of ethnic and religious minorities, including within the police and other relevant authorities".

Translation...It shall be criminal for white Europeans to dissent and organize against the non-white Third World invasions of their lands, the attempted destruction of their nations and culture, and the attempted genocide of their people.