Saw this about a week ago, but just now actually read the article. Long article, but very interesting in the admissions and illustrations of the tactics of the enemy.
If you can stomach reading it, it's a sickening pseudo-scholarly discourse from the jewish/left-wing/communist perspective on how we have to socially engineer children to not behave naturally, see racial realities or form their beliefs from actual life experience, but rather how they must have it drilled into their impressionable heads via lies and intimidation into believing the "one human race", "equality", "there are no differences" jewish view on race (ie, the jewish program for the destruction of the white race through race-mixing).
The article admits that racial segregation and racial solidarity is a natural phenomenon. Whites (and other races) naturally, from an early age, overwhelmingly choose to befriend, interact with, and be loyal to others of their own race. So in order to counter this and force whites to mingle with the other races, Jewry has chosen the weapon of a skewed/distorted/falsified version of history (or false moral view of that history) that acts to cast white history (eg, "colonialism") and white racial segregation as one of the "great evils of history", and induce false guilt in the white population.
As we all know, the jewish propaganda taught to us from an early age in school (and then reinforced later in life by mountains of propaganda in the jewish-controlled universities, media, Hollywood, etc) is such: "Evil whitey" has "mistreated" the poor persecuted minorities throughout history, and continues to "discriminate" against them to this very day in our "wonderful multicultural diversified" societies. And, of course, whites should feel deeply guilty and ashamed for this. Because of this inherent "racism" by whites against browns and blacks, it's "ok", for instance, to allow a blatant double standard where it's acceptable for browns and blacks to have ethnic pride, but "horrible" for whites. Whites are guilt-tripped into hating themselves and seeing themselves as the world's "persecutors", allowing blacks and browns to take "revenge" upon them (eg, affirmative action) and providing the justification for allowing non-whites to take over white nations and breed "evil whitey" out of existence.
This false "white guilt" history is the foundation not only for blatant double standards on race, but the very policies that are designed to destroy our nations and people -- eg, mass non-white immigration into white homelands, etc. Clearly, this skewed view of history must be changed if we are to annihilate the white guilt and the rest of the anti-white agenda that jewry has orchestrated from it.
I've just referenced some of the most interesting excerpts from this long article (see page 5 on the Newsweek site at link below for red-bolded section):
See Baby Discriminate
Kids as young as 6 months judge others based on skin color. What's a parent to do?
By Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman NEWSWEEK
Published Sep 5, 2009
[...]
Bigler ran a study in which children read brief biographies of famous African-Americans. For instance, in a biography of Jackie Robinson, they read that he was the first African-American in the major leagues. But only half read about how he'd previously been relegated to the Negro Leagues, and how he suffered taunts from white fans. Those facts—in five brief sentences were omitted in the version given to the other children.
After the two-week history class, the children were surveyed on their racial attitudes. White children who got the full story about historical discrimination had significantly better attitudes toward blacks than those who got the neutered version. Explicitness works. "It also made them feel some guilt," Bigler adds. "It knocked down their glorified view of white people." They couldn't justify in-group superiority.
[...]
Preparation for bias is not, however, the only way minorities talk to their children about race. The other broad category of conversation, in Harris-Britt's analysis, is ethnic pride. From a very young age, minority children are coached to be proud of their ethnic history. She found that this was exceedingly good for children's self-confidence; in one study, black children who'd heard messages of ethnic pride were more engaged in school and more likely to attribute their success to their effort and ability.
That leads to the question that everyone wonders but rarely dares to ask. If "black pride" is good for African-American children, where does that leave white children? It's horrifying to imagine kids being "proud to be white." Yet many scholars argue that's exactly what children's brains are already computing. Just as minority children are aware that they belong to an ethnic group with less status and wealth, most white children naturally decipher that they belong to the race that has more power, wealth, and control in society; this provides security, if not confidence. So a pride message would not just be abhorrent—it'd be redundant.
[...]
No comments:
Post a Comment