Showing posts with label Anti-White Hatred and Propaganda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Anti-White Hatred and Propaganda. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

"Anti-government, survivalist, white supremacist Christian Identity" individuals targetted as most dangerous enemies of JOG

Erroll Southers is Barack Obamas nominee to head the Transportation Safety Administration — the TSA, that organization that screens passengers getting on airplanes. [1]




Erroll Southers: "Most of the domestic groups that we have to pay attention to here are white supremacist groups. They're anti-government, in most cases anti-abortion. They are usually survivalist type of nature, Identity oriented.

[...]

Those groups are groups that claim to be extremely anti-government and Christian Identity oriented."

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

Flashback - Tasteless cartoon "How to Cook a Gentile" reinforcing Jewish "blood libel" & contempt for White race published in Jewish "Heeb" magazine



Link to cartoon in Heeb Magazine

comment:

While I acknowledge Heeb magazine is a satirical equivalent of National Lampoon magazine, I take profound offense to your cartoon as a white American.

There's nothing funny about the cartoon, because it reinforces the Jewish stereotype of "blood libel". Your tasteless cartoon prove the point of Jewish superiority and hateful attitude towards the white race referred to as "Goy" in a derogatory manner.

It's hypocritical of ADL, JDL and other Zionist organizations to remain silent and not condemn the cartoon in question, even under the context of satire. If it were the opposite in vice versa with the whites terminating Jews, these organizations would be up in arms and protest to demand the removal of the magazine from the magazine stands at the bookstores nationwide.

Thursday, September 17, 2009

Disgusting article in Jews' Newsweek rag: Black Pride OK, White Pride "horrific" and "abhorrent"; White children must be indoctrinated to feel guilty



Saw this about a week ago, but just now actually read the article. Long article, but very interesting in the admissions and illustrations of the tactics of the enemy.

If you can stomach reading it, it's a sickening pseudo-scholarly discourse from the jewish/left-wing/communist perspective on how we have to socially engineer children to not behave naturally, see racial realities or form their beliefs from actual life experience, but rather how they must have it drilled into their impressionable heads via lies and intimidation into believing the "one human race", "equality", "there are no differences" jewish view on race (ie, the jewish program for the destruction of the white race through race-mixing).

The article admits that racial segregation and racial solidarity is a natural phenomenon. Whites (and other races) naturally, from an early age, overwhelmingly choose to befriend, interact with, and be loyal to others of their own race. So in order to counter this and force whites to mingle with the other races, Jewry has chosen the weapon of a skewed/distorted/falsified version of history (or false moral view of that history) that acts to cast white history (eg, "colonialism") and white racial segregation as one of the "great evils of history", and induce false guilt in the white population.

As we all know, the jewish propaganda taught to us from an early age in school (and then reinforced later in life by mountains of propaganda in the jewish-controlled universities, media, Hollywood, etc) is such: "Evil whitey" has "mistreated" the poor persecuted minorities throughout history, and continues to "discriminate" against them to this very day in our "wonderful multicultural diversified" societies. And, of course, whites should feel deeply guilty and ashamed for this. Because of this inherent "racism" by whites against browns and blacks, it's "ok", for instance, to allow a blatant double standard where it's acceptable for browns and blacks to have ethnic pride, but "horrible" for whites. Whites are guilt-tripped into hating themselves and seeing themselves as the world's "persecutors", allowing blacks and browns to take "revenge" upon them (eg, affirmative action) and providing the justification for allowing non-whites to take over white nations and breed "evil whitey" out of existence.

This false "white guilt" history is the foundation not only for blatant double standards on race, but the very policies that are designed to destroy our nations and people -- eg, mass non-white immigration into white homelands, etc. Clearly, this skewed view of history must be changed if we are to annihilate the white guilt and the rest of the anti-white agenda that jewry has orchestrated from it.


I've just referenced some of the most interesting excerpts from this long article (see page 5 on the Newsweek site at link below for red-bolded section):

See Baby Discriminate

Kids as young as 6 months judge others based on skin color. What's a parent to do?


By Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman NEWSWEEK
Published Sep 5, 2009

[...]

Bigler ran a study in which children read brief biographies of famous African-Americans. For instance, in a biography of Jackie Robinson, they read that he was the first African-American in the major leagues. But only half read about how he'd previously been relegated to the Negro Leagues, and how he suffered taunts from white fans. Those facts—in five brief sentences were omitted in the version given to the other children.

After the two-week history class, the children were surveyed on their racial attitudes. White children who got the full story about historical discrimination had significantly better attitudes toward blacks than those who got the neutered version. Explicitness works. "It also made them feel some guilt," Bigler adds. "It knocked down their glorified view of white people." They couldn't justify in-group superiority.

[...]

Preparation for bias is not, however, the only way minorities talk to their children about race. The other broad category of conversation, in Harris-Britt's analysis, is ethnic pride. From a very young age, minority children are coached to be proud of their ethnic history. She found that this was exceedingly good for children's self-confidence; in one study, black children who'd heard messages of ethnic pride were more engaged in school and more likely to attribute their success to their effort and ability.

That leads to the question that everyone wonders but rarely dares to ask. If "black pride" is good for African-American children, where does that leave white children? It's horrifying to imagine kids being "proud to be white." Yet many scholars argue that's exactly what children's brains are already computing. Just as minority children are aware that they belong to an ethnic group with less status and wealth, most white children naturally decipher that they belong to the race that has more power, wealth, and control in society; this provides security, if not confidence. So a pride message would not just be abhorrent—it'd be redundant.

[...]

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

White South African granted asylum in Canada after 7 violent attacks from blacks - Ruling blacks in South Africa say ruling is "racist"

Remember that old proverb..."The jew cries out in pain, as he strikes you."

The negroes have learned something from their jewish masters.

White South African granted asylum in Canada after attacks from blacks

A white South African has been granted refugee status in Canada after an immigration board ruled he faced persecution from black people if he returned to his native country.

By Ian Evans in Cape Town
Telegraph
Published: 31 Aug 2009

Brandon Huntley, 31, originally from Cape Town, said he was attacked seven times, including three stabbings, by black South Africans during muggings and robberies before he moved to Canada.

He claimed he was called a "white dog" and a "settler" by black people in a reference to South Africa's colonial and apartheid past.

The Ottawa Sun newspaper reported that the immigration board last Thursday granted him refugee status allowing him to stay in Canada.

"I find that the claimant would stand out like a 'sore thumb' due to his colour in any part of the country," tribunal panel chair William Davis was quoted as saying.

Mr Huntley first travelled to Canada on a six-month work permit in 2004 to work as a carnival attendant. He returned to South Africa and then went back to work in Canada in 2005 for a year and stayed illegally for an additional year until he made a refugee claim in April 2008.

It is thought to be the first time a white South African man has been granted refugee status in Canada claiming he was the victim of black aggression.

Speaking about black on white violence in South Africa, Mr Huntley said: "There's a hatred of what we did to them and it's all about the colour of your skin."


South African ANC Says Canada’s Refugee Ruling Racist

bloomberg
By Paul Richardson and Greg Quinn

Sept. 2 (Bloomberg) -- South Africa’s ruling African National Congress branded as “racist” a ruling by Canada’s immigration board that gave a white South African citizen refugee status.

[...]

“Canada’s reasoning for granting Huntley a refugee status can only serve to perpetuate racism,” Brian Sokutu, the ANC’s spokesman, said in an e-mailed statement. “South Africa is a constitutional democracy with organs of state fully in place to fight crime without any reference to race of a victim or perpetrator.”

[...]

Thursday, July 16, 2009

The Hated White Race

by David Yeagley · June 16, 2009

“Fifty years from now, there won’t even be any white people!” said my pathological Middle Eastern neighbor. He knew I was an American Indian, and he expected me to dance in his vision.

I didn’t. I found his attitude, and that of his angry black wife, repulsive. I don’t appreciate being presumed upon or being dictated to in any matter, especially in the matter of race. Nobody tells this Indian how to think. I’m free to like and dislike whomever I please, for whatever reasons I choose.

My two neighbors were racists, obviously. And they were making me a victim of their racism. Because I was non-white, they presumed I was a natural partner in their resentment and animosity toward the white race. I was judged by the color of my skin, so to speak.

This all happened many years ago, but, I never forgot it. Today, I see truth in the words of my Middle Eastern neighbor. White women are leaping in bed with black men, or other darkies of the world, and popping out strange-looking children. Generally speaking, the male in these incidents could not care less about the children. It’s all about sexual aggression against the white race. They’re happy to conquer for the moment, and to create ghastly, permanent consequences. Marriage and family have nothing to do with these misanthropes, nor the lusus naturae they create.

This denigration of race is a cruel mockery of manhood. It is a pathetic testimony of the personal irresponsibility and malignant selfishness of failed men. Indeed, a careless woman is generally such for the lack of a caring father.

But I will not dismiss this kind of race destruction as sexual caprice or mindless ego in aimless men. It is not some Über-design of social architects, or the express intent of integrationists. While racial disintegration may be the result, there are other inevitabilities at work in the process.

Like the universal law of aesthetics. We want beauty. Superior beauty lies in the white race. It is the variety of color, the red hair, the blonde hair, the green eyes, the blue eyes. All the other races in the world have only one coloring, the same black hair, the dark brown eyes and skin. A bit drab in comparison, can’t we say?





















A true redhead, only in the hated white race.


The darkies of the world are truly fascinated with the white race, and always have been. However, there is a certain envy that naturally, unavoidably develops. It seems Hitler had a point when he referred to “the hated white race.” (Mein Kampf, p.325.) But the sexual encounter of the dark with the white makes the white dark. And what most people—especially white people—forget is the fact that the white race is the minority in the world. It is, and has always been, vastly out-numbered by the dark races. Moreover, the pigmentations of the white race are all genetically recessive. The whiteness is first to fade.

Therefore, integration tends to mean elimination for the white race. That’s simply the way of the genetic world. That the white race became the most powerful, dominant, ruling race may be attributed to cultural values more than anything else. It was of course the white race that adopted the Judeo-Christian religion. The social constructs and psychological hierarchies in this tradition evolved a people more astute and agile in every way.





















A true blonde, only in the hated white race.


Whatever ‘mental’ problems the white race developed as a result of being more powerful are only fairly recent evolutions. In his day the white man has created a throne like no other in history. If it is criminal at the foundation, the challenge is chiefly from envy—always the weakest charge. Besides, what’s the point of the dark man accusing the white man of not keeping his white morals, if the dark man himself does not believe in those morals? The charge of hypocrisy is moot, made in impotence. (The white man’s self-flagellation is the only hope of the darkies.)

I would not look forward to a time when there is no white race. My neighbors were nothing I would want to see more of in this world—certainly not their attitude. But that there is a growing number of people in the world who think like them is a concern. The Muslim world tends to produce such a disposition.

Disguised though it may be in moral and religious terms, political terms, or even genetic terms, the case is fairly obvious: “the hated white race” is such for its beauty and power.










Thanks to The White Christ for the find.

Monday, July 13, 2009

Pack of 50 black teens attack white Ohio family shouting "this is a black world"; Father hospitalized with concussion; Police say not a 'hate crime'

Rest assured if the situation were reversed and in the last week a pack of 50 white teens had savagely attacked a black family in the United States saying "this is a white world", it would be a national news story in the Jews' Media rivalling Michael Jackson's death. But since it's blacks beating up whites, ho hum.

Instead, the jews are making a national story by bitching and whining about how some private swim club in Pennsylvania allegedly won't allow blacks and hispanics to their pool. Right to freedom of association be damned, whites must submit to jewish-lead miscegenation!














Martin Marshall (right) recounts the attack by a group of teens on himself and his family while they were watching a Fourth of July fireworks display in Firestone Park. His daughter, Rachel Hopson, 15, (left) and wife, Yvonne Marshall

Akron police investigate teen mob attack on family

By Phil Trexler
Beacon Journal
Jul 07, 2009

Akron police say they aren't ready to call it a hate crime or a gang initiation.

But to Marty Marshall, his wife and two kids, it seems pretty clear.

It came after a family night of celebrating America and freedom with a fireworks show at Firestone Stadium. Marshall, his family and two friends were gathered outside a friend's home in South Akron.

Out of nowhere, the six were attacked by dozens of teenage boys, who shouted ''This is our world'' and ''This is a black world'' as they confronted Marshall and his family.

The Marshalls, who are white, say the crowd of teens who attacked them and two friends June 27 on Girard Street numbered close to 50. The teens were all black.

''This was almost like being a terrorist act,'' Marshall said. ''And we allow this to go on in our neighborhoods?''

They said it started when one teen, without any words or warning, blindsided and assaulted Marshall's friend as he stood outside with the others.

When Marshall, 39, jumped in, he found himself being attacked by the growing group of teens.

His daughter, Rachel, 15, who weighs about 90 pounds, tried to come to his rescue. The teens pushed her to the ground.

His wife, Yvonne, pushed their son, Donald, 14, into bushes to keep him protected.

''My thing is,'' Marshall said, ''I didn't want this, but I was in fear for my wife, my kids and my friends. I felt I had to stay out there to protect them, because those guys were just jumping, swinging fists and everything.

''I'm lucky. They didn't break my ribs or bruise my ribs. I thank God, they concentrated on my thick head because I do have one. They were trying to take my head off my spine, basically.''

After several minutes of punches and kicks, the attack ended and the group ran off. The Marshalls' two adult male friends were not seriously hurt.

''I don't think I thought at that moment when I tried to jump in,'' Rachel Marshall said. ''But when I was laying on the ground, I was just scared.''

Marshall was the most seriously injured. He suffered a concussion and multiple bruises to his head and eye. He said he spent five nights in the critical care unit at Akron General Medical Center.

The construction worker said he now fears for his family's safety, and the thousands of dollars in medical bills he faces without insurance.

''I knew I was going to get beat, but not as bad as I did,'' Marshall said. ''But I did it to protect my family. I didn't have a choice. There was no need for this. We should be all getting along. But to me, it seems to be racist.''

Akron police are investigating. Right now, the case is not being classified as a racial hate crime. There were no other reports of victims assaulted by the group that night.

The department's gang unit is involved in the investigation, police said.

''We don't know if it's a known gang, or just a group of kids,'' police Lt. Rick Edwards said.

The Marshalls say they fear retaliation at home or when they go outside. They are considering arming themselves, but they're concerned about the possible problems that come with guns.

For now, they are hoping police can bring them suspects. They believe they can identify several of the attackers.

''This makes you think about your freedom,'' Marshall said. ''In all reality, where is your freedom when you have this going on?''

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Black comedian Jamie Foxx calls Miley Cyrus a "little white bitch" - Where's the outcry from the Jewish media for firing a la Don Imus?

Let's say hypothetically that a white comedian had called a young black actress a "little black bitch." Wouldn't that white comedian be lambasted in the Jews' Media, with calls for his career to be over, etc? And where are Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton?

Don't tell me there's a double standard...

Foxx Says Sorry for Miley 'Sex Tape' Gaffe

The Oscar-winning 'Ray' actor, 41, lashed out at Cyrus, 16, on his satellite radio show on Sunday after a listener of 'The Foxxhole' brought up the young star's aged beef with Radiohead. He called Cyrus a "little white bi**h" for being mildly upset about not getting to meet the British band at the Grammy Awards and advised her to "make a sex tape and grow up."

But that wasn't the worrst of it. After making fun of the 'Hannah Montana' star's showy gums, Foxx told his listeners Cyrus should "get like Britney Spears and do some heroin. Do like Lindsay Lohan and start seeing a lesbian and get some crack in your pipe. Catch chlamydia on a bicycle seat."

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

GOP Negro Chairman Michael Steele agrees with DL Hughley's comment that 2008 GOP convention "looked like Nazi Germany"



Hughley confronted Steele on the Republican’s implementation of their big tent philosophy.

“Well, Michael, I agree. I’m telling you, if it were the sign alone — in other words, the tenets of the Republican Party are amazing and they seem warm and welcome. But when I watch it be applied — like you didn’t have to go much further than the Republican National Convention.”

“Agreed,” replied Steele.

“It literally look like Nazi Germany. It literally did. I make that point, not only are we not welcome — not only are we not welcome, but they don’t even care what we think,” explained Hughley.

Steele nodded his head as Hughley compared the GOP to the Nazi Party, and then said “You’re right.”


Related:

Jewish-controlled Republican party taking a hard turn to the left - Opportunity for white conservatives to form new opposition party

Jews at The Weekly Standard declare conservative movement "dead", spew hatred at whites, usher in kosher khanservative movement

Black racialist politics at the Detriot City Council - Whites told to "go home" and not invoke Obama's name

I'm not condemning blacks (or other non-whites) for their nationalistic and racialistic views. Not in the least. But they must practice it in their own nations. And whites must have their own nations exclusively for themselves where they can, in turn, enforce their own racial nationalism.

Racial loyalty and nationalism is a natural and healthy instinct for the preservation of one's own people. And it's no secret that a majority of blacks (and hispanics, arabs, jews, and virtually all other non-whites) are highly racialistic.

The point here is to call attention to the double standard on racialism by the jewish media and establishment. The ruling jewish establishment allows and encourages non-white "minorities" in white western nations to be highly racialistic as part of the overall agenda of fracturing, weakening, and destroying white nations and the ongoing genocide against white people. It is only whites who are demonized by the jewish establishment for exhibiting racial loyalty or racial nationalism.



Commentary: Elect a crazy council, get crazy results

detnews.com | Nolan Finley | Sunday, March 1, 2009

Nowhere is Michigan's brain drain on greater display than in the Detroit City Council chambers.

My hopes for Detroit's future faded as I watched the tape of last Tuesday's council meeting, the one that considered the Cobo Center expansion deal.

It was a tragic circus, a festival of ignorance that confirmed the No. 1 obstacle to Detroit's progress is the bargain basement leaders that city voters elect. The black nationalism that is now the dominant ideology of the council was on proud display, both at the table and in the audience.

Speakers advocating for the deal were taunted by the crowd and cut short by Council President Monica Conyers, who presided over the hearing like an angry bulldog; whites were advised by the citizens to, "Go home."

Opponents were allowed to rant and ramble on uninterrupted about "those people" who want to steal Detroit's assets and profit from the city's labors.

A pitiful Teamster official who practically crawled to the table on his knees expressing profuse respect for this disrespectful body was battered by both the crowd and the council.

When he dared suggest that an improved Cobo Center would create more good-paying jobs for union workers, Conyers reminded him, "Those workers look like you; they don't look like me."

Desperate, he invoked President Barack Obama's message of unity and was angrily warned, "Don't you say his name here."


Juxtapose the place and the faces and imagine a white Livonia City Council treating a black union representative with such overt racial hostility. The Justice Department would swoop down like a hawk, and the Rev. Al Sharpton would clog Five Mile Road with protesters.

But in Detroit, dealing with the council's bigotry is part of the cost of doing business. As is dealing with its incompetence.

[...]

Monday, February 9, 2009

The Atlantic announces the "end of white America" - Jews cheer the destruction of white western civilization



The End of White America?

The Election of Barack Obama is just the most startling manifestation of a larger trend: the gradual erosion of “whiteness” as the touchstone of what it means to be American. If the end of white America is a cultural and demographic inevitability, what will the new mainstream look like—and how will white Americans fit into it? What will it mean to be white when whiteness is no longer the norm? And will a post-white America be less racially divided—or more so?

by Hua Hsu
January/February 2009

"Civilization’s going to pieces,” he remarks. He is in polite company, gathered with friends around a bottle of wine in the late-afternoon sun, chatting and gossiping. “I’ve gotten to be a terrible pessimist about things. Have you read The Rise of the Colored Empires by this man Goddard?” They hadn’t. “Well, it’s a fine book, and everybody ought to read it. The idea is if we don’t look out the white race will be—will be utterly submerged. It’s all scientific stuff; it’s been proved.”

He is Tom Buchanan, a character in F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby, a book that nearly everyone who passes through the American education system is compelled to read at least once. Although Gatsby doesn’t gloss as a book on racial anxiety—it’s too busy exploring a different set of anxieties entirely—Buchanan was hardly alone in feeling besieged. The book by “this man Goddard” had a real-world analogue: Lothrop Stoddard’s The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy, published in 1920, five years before Gatsby. Nine decades later, Stoddard’s polemic remains oddly engrossing. He refers to World War I as the “White Civil War” and laments the “cycle of ruin” that may result if the “white world” continues its infighting. The book features a series of foldout maps depicting the distribution of “color” throughout the world and warns, “Colored migration is a universal peril, menacing every part of the white world.”

As briefs for racial supremacy go, The Rising Tide of Color is eerily serene. Its tone is scholarly and gentlemanly, its hatred rationalized and, in Buchanan’s term, “scientific.” And the book was hardly a fringe phenomenon. It was published by Scribner, also Fitzgerald’s publisher, and Stoddard, who received a doctorate in history from Harvard, was a member of many professional academic associations. It was precisely the kind of book that a 1920s man of Buchanan’s profile—wealthy, Ivy League–educated, at once pretentious and intellectually insecure—might have been expected to bring up in casual conversation.

As white men of comfort and privilege living in an age of limited social mobility, of course, Stoddard and the Buchanans in his audience had nothing literal to fear. Their sense of dread hovered somewhere above the concerns of everyday life. It was linked less to any immediate danger to their class’s political and cultural power than to the perceived fraying of the fixed, monolithic identity of whiteness that sewed together the fortunes of the fair-skinned.

[...]

Full article

Thursday, February 5, 2009

Jews not satisfied to just demonize and slander German men over the Nazi era and mythical Holohoax - now turning to German women



Behind every Nazi mass murderer was a woman: New book claims women under Hitler were just as ruthless as men

Daily Mail | Feb 3, 2009
By Alan Hall

Women who worked under Adolf Hitler were just as ruthless as men, a shocking new book reveals.

Female Perpetrators; Women Under National Socialism exposes the myth that women under Hitler were the fairer sex and were simply caught up in the cruel actions of men.

In Nazi art, films and magazines, women were always portrayed as the fairer sex, fighting on the home-front as their menfolk fought on the battlefields.

But the book, which goes on sale in Germany this week, shows this was all propaganda and that women who worked under Hitler were just as brutal as men.

In the first German post-war reckoning of the role of women in underwriting the crimes of the Nazis, historian Kathrin Kompisch has revealed what has been swept under the carpet since 1945.

‘The history of National Socialism has long been reduced to one that blamed men for everything,’ Ms Kompisch said. ‘This was and is the popular picture.’

But the fairer sex venerated by the propaganda machine of Josef Goebbels was, according to Ms Kompisch, every bit as eager to turn the thumb-screws on the victims held in Gestapo cellars across Europe.

Her book shows that women were also every bit as fanatical as the men when it came to crushing resistance to the state.

[...]

full article

Monday, January 12, 2009

Holohoax brainwashing turned up - German children forced to visit concentration camp sites in order to fight "far right extremism"

More evidence that the Holohoax is not history. It's an ideology, a social engineering tool...used to demonize white nationalism in general, and conversely to enforce the multi-racial Third World immigration agenda being used to destroy white nations. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article5468635.ece
German children will be forced to see concentration camp sitesJanuary 8, 2009Roger Boyes in Berlin German children will be obliged to visit the site of a Nazi concentration camp as part of their regular school curriculum. The move — to be introduced in Bavaria and likely to become the norm throughout the country — is in response to the almost fatal stabbing of a senior police officer by a neo-Nazi. "We have to take a stand against this far-right octopus, this tentacled monster," said Host Seehofer, the prime minister of Bavaria, who has ordered every ministry to come up with proposals to stamp out neo-Nazi influence in southern Germany. They will feed into a comprehensive action plan to be unveiled next week. "The first thing we have to do is set up a website that will give a point of contact to everyone who has problems with far-right extremists," Joachim Herrmann, the Bavarian interior minster, said. "Our aim must be to bring up kids so that they can resist any attempt by the far-Right to lead them astray." In the Bavarian case this will mean a compulsory visit to a concentration camp — usually Dachau, outside Munich — or former offshoots of camps where slave labourers were forced to work for the German war effort. History lessons will also include excursions to centres that document Nazi crimes such as the one that has been set up near Hitler's Alpine refuge on the Obersalzberg. The German educational system is organised on federal lines and some regions already take high school students to former camps. The Holocaust is taught in every senior school during history lessons and in civic studies. Some religion teachers also draw on the moral choices faced or neglected during the Third Reich. The curriculum of North Rhine Westphalia — where camp excursions are already common practice — stipulates that teachers must emphasise the Holocaust from the perspective of the victim. German experience in teaching about Nazi atrocities is being used to inform a new British scheme to engage a Holocaust specialist in every seconday school. The Holocaust Education Trust recently received £1.5 million from the British Government to send two sixth-formers from every school to Auschwitz. German Holocaust education, though taken very seriously by education ministries, is often sloppy in its implementation. It is too easy for pupils to dodge out of a camp excursion and the children are often left to their own devices when they arrive at the site. The Bavarian plan is supposed to bring more rigour into the visits and if possible to link up the children with a camp survivor. Moreover the teaching of the Nazi period is supposed to be conducted not in a historical vacuum but to be compared with contemporary anti-Semitism and racial intolerance. The Bavarian authorities see a direct link between Holocaust denial and neo-Nazi violence. Some of the measures to be introduced next week include a new programme to encourage young people to extract themselves from far-right groupings —they often stumble into a gang and stay because of peer-pressure — and a crackdown on Germans who use American websites to access forbidden material glorifying Hitler and the Third Reich. Neo-Nazi sympathisers circumvent strict German laws by making contact with American-based mail order companies who send out Nazi memoribilia and German-language pamphlets on the Third Reich. "We are going to talk to the US authorities about this," said Mr Herrmann. "It is not acceptible that publications denying the Holocaust should be made available here." Holocaust denial, the display of the swastika, the sale of Hitler's memoir Mein Kampf and the raising of the straight-armed Hitler salute are all banned in Germany. The Bavarian action — long overdue, according to officials from other regional states — was triggered by an assault on Alois Mannichl, chief of police in the Bavarian town of Passau. He was famous for his hard line against right-wing extremists and there is little doubt that this was the motive for his doorstep stabbing. The culprit is still at large. Passau is a particularly sensitive place for such an attack. A young amateur historian, Anna Rosmus, kicked up a stir there in the 1990s when she exposed how many of the local bigwigs had been enthusiastic Nazis and how ordinary people had benefitted from, and exploited, forced labourers. The town turned against Ms Rosmus, who left for the United States. In the meantime, the old Nazi generation has died out or has no say in the town, but younger neo-Nazis, some of them the granchildren of Nazi veterans, have become active, stoking sentiment against foreigners.

Friday, January 2, 2009

Vast vast majority of white Americans have absolutely no connection to African slavery in America

source: http://downwithjugears.blogspot.com/
The Real Slave TradersFriday, January 02, 2009For decades, the White people of America have been subjected to a continual barrage from blacks and others that you and I are somehow responsible for the African slave trade and that we need to atone for our "guilt." There are a number of flaws with the idea that we are somehow responsible for the African slave trade. First of all, very few White people even owned slaves--slavery was a rich man's luxury and slavery did not exist amongst the middle and working classes of White people. Second of all, even if every one of us had an ancestor who owned slaves (which is an extremely unlikely proposition) it makes little sense to blame the children for the supposed sins of their fathers. Third of all, it is a fact that blacks sold their own kind into slavery. As this is the case, blacks are every bit as much to blame for slavery as are Whites. Arabs raided territories of negro tribes, enslaving the strong, killing the weak. Fourth, European Whites did not bring the slaves to America. On the contrary, it was the Asiatic Jews who brought them here (as Louis Farakhan has also pointed out.) Below is a listing of the Jewish slave ships and the Jewish owners of them.Abigail, Crown, Nassau, Four Sisters - (Anne & Eliza Prudent - Jews)Betty - (Aaron Lopez, Jew)Hester - (Moses Levy, Jew)Elizabeth - (Jacob Franks - Jew)Antigua - (Isaac Levy - Jew)Betsy - (Moses Levy - Jew)Polly White - (Justus Bosch and John Abrams - Jew) Horse and Expedition - (Mordecai and David Gomez - Jews)Charlotte - (Marston and Abram Lyell - Jews)Caracoa - (William de Woolf - Jew)Source: Elizabeth Donnan, 4 Volumes, Documents Illustrative of the History of the Slave Trade to America Washington, D.C. 1930, 1935 Carnegie Institute of Technology, Pittsburgh, Pa. So, my fellow White American, there is nothing whatsoever to feel guilty about concerning slavery. It is time to quit apologizing for something others are responsible for. Besides, approximately six hundred thousand White soldiers died in the American Civil War. Have you ever heard of blacks paying homage to or thanking these men?
I would also add the following important point. A very large percentage of the current white-European population of the United States are descendants of people who immigrated to North America after the 1860s and the period of the war between the Confederacy and the Union -- in the great immigration waves of the late 1800s and early 1900s. Therefore, these whites obviously could not have owned slaves. So knowing that at the time of slavery only the very rich actually owned slaves, and the vast majority of whites were poor rural farmers who did not own slaves...and knowing that a large portion of whites in America are descended from people who immigrated to the United States after slavery was outlawed as an institution...I would estimate that only 1-2% (if not lower) of white people in the United States today are descended from people who ever owned slaves.Furthermore, not all slaves in the Americas were black Africans. Although this fact has been white-washed from the jewish-controlled psuedo "history" taught today, there were thousands, if not millions, of white slaves as well.---------------------------------------------------------------Related:Suppressed History: White Slavery in Early America and Industrial Britain

Wednesday, December 31, 2008

British police officer suspended from job for membership in BNP

Destruction of the white (true Israelite) western nations is absolutely key in the world jewish-satanic conspiracy. Therefore, white nationalism, the very belief in the idea of nations exclusively for white peoples is to be made a crime. According to these devils, Europeans-whites do not have the right to have nations for themselves in order to preserve their ethnic and cultural identity. Rather, they must submit to the jewish "multicultural" agenda of massive non-white invasions, displacement, and ethnic and cultural genocide through miscegenation and absorption with the other races.source: Telegraph
Police officer named on BNP list to face misconduct panel23 Dec 2008PC Steve Bettley, of Merseyside Police, was included in the list of the far right party's entire membership register which was leaked on an internet blog.The officer, who was briefly the driver for chief constable Bernard Hogan Howe, has been suspended from duty since the list became public last month.A Merseyside Police spokeswoman said: "Merseyside Police has completed its investigation of an officer alleged to be a member of the BNP."It has been recommended that the Police Constable face a misconduct panel."The matter is now in the hands of Merseyside Police's solicitors for further consideration."The Constable remains suspended."The leak provoked outrage after members of the BNP were revealed to be current and former servicemen, teachers and doctors. The list included the names, professions, addresses and telephone numbers of thousands of BNP supporters. When the list was published, BNP leader Nick Griffin pledged to take court action against those behind the leak. Dyfed-Powys Police is leading a joint investigation with the Information Commissioner's office into the alleged breach of the Data Protection Act. A Dyfed-Powys spokeswoman said: "Two people were arrested in Nottinghamshire on December 4 in connection with an allegation of a criminal offence under the Data Protection Act. "They have been bailed pending further inquiries."

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Hymiewood's Obsession with Nazis; Communism Gets Kosher Pass

10 billion Jewish Hollywood movies, television specials, etc on the "monstrous evil" of the German Nazis and the mythical "murder of 6 million" precious Jews that never actually happened. Meanwhile, the Jewish Bolsheviks actually slaughtered ~60 million Russians and Ukranians, and the Chinese Communists actually killed 60+ million. And how many movies have the Jews made on those real genocides? I wonder why Jewish-inspired communism gets a pass, and WWII-era Germans are so unfairly vilified and defamed? http://etherzone.com/2008/beam121208.shtml
VALKYRIE - HOLLYWOOD TAKES A SAFE CRUISE (AGAIN)By: Roderick T. BeamanThe airways are plying ads for ongoing Christmas movie releases. One trailer is for Tom Cruise’s Valkyrie. Anyone who has had access to the internet for the past few years is aware that the filming of the movie ran onto some resistance in Germany due to Cruise’s Scientology which is discouraged through much of Europe. We’ve seen the pictures of Cruise with an eyepatch in a German uniform. His character lost his eye in the African campaign. The trailer shows the officers plotting to kill Adolf Hitler and some of the dialogue concerns how it is to be for the good of Germany. There’s an attache case with the bomb that is meant to kill him. Hitler escaped and there was a purging of much of the German military leadership. I understand that Hollywood is abuzz over the movie with talk of Oscar nominations abounding. It’s directed by Brian Singer who did a sterling job with ‘The Usual Suspects’. Of course, Cruise and the other personnel are being hailed for producing this. Hollywood never ceases congratulating itself for stomping on a dead ideology. It’s being hailed as a taut thriller. Aren’t they all? The movie brings to 10,582 the number of Hollywood movies that have focused on the evil of Hitler, the Nazis, various Neo-Nazi plots and WWII Germany as our enemy. I think the number of Hollywood movies to focus on the danger of communism have been two, Gregory Peck’s ‘The Chairman’ and ‘The Killing Fields’ but the former only did it obliquely. I can’t think of a single other one and neither focused on the Soviet Union. [...]The horrors of Germany and Europe under National Socialism have never been too far from Hollywood’s consciousness. Indeed, the capture in 1960 of Adolf Eichmann by the Mossad in Argentina and his subsequent trial and hanging in Jerusalem prompted a flood of books and movie and television productions about the extermination program. By contrast, we never encounter a Russian, a Red Chinese or a Castroite Cuban as some kind of a menace, bent on our destruction. No, that only seems to emerge from National Socialist Germany. The fact is that the German concentration camps were liberated 63 years ago and the remaining personnel from them must be fewer than 1,000 by now. By contrast, the Gulag was only broken up in 1953, after Stalin’s death. The reeducation camps of Mao-Tse Tung persisted to after his death in 1976. The outrages of Cambodia occurred at the end of Mao’s life. Surely, many of the people involved in those horrors are still alive. Where is the clamor for them to face justice? It sure isn’t coming from Hollywood![...]

Monday, December 15, 2008

Taking 'White Guilt™' back to the Viking Times

You could spend months and years analyzing all the anti-white and race-mixing propaganda from the Jews'Media, Talmudvision, and Hymiewood, and still not cover it all -- but the 2007 movie Pathfinder is particularly bold. Here's the plot summary: A young Viking boy in the Americas around 900 A.D. is raised by native 'Indians', takes a liking to a native girl, and feels guilty for the mass slaughter of natives by the invading Vikings, so he decides to betray his own people and help the natives wage war against the Vikings. In the end, he successfully helps the natives defeat the Vikings, and becomes a leader in a native tribe. Whites betraying and destroying their own people, mongrelizing their genetics with other races, and happily participating in the genocide of their own kind? A Jewish dream come true! http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/12/on_vikings_and_victims_whitegu.html
On Vikings and Victims: White-Guilt in ContextBy Raymond IbrahimDecember 14, 2008 All-permeating "white-guilt" did not appear out of thin air. It has taken a sustained propaganda effort, a wide-ranging mobilization of education and culture, to inculcate and sustain self-loathing among American Caucasians. Like the Coca-Cola TM brand, white-guilt needs endless repetition to remain struck in the thought and behavioral processes of the masses.The movie Pathfinder, which I saw on cable, offers a vivid example of the sort of brainwashing intended to refresh the white-guilt TM brand in the thinking habits of young people in particular. Set around 900 AD, the film deals with Viking incursions into North America. The Vikings are portrayed as ironclad giants -- more monster than human -- mounted atop massive Clydesdales, barking and grunting obscenities in some strange tongue; the natives, as expected, gentle, innocent, and peace-loving. This theme, of course, is not new.Subtleties playing on white-guilt, however, are spread throughout. Consider the usage of language. The Vikings speak only Norse, with English subtitles (though the viewer could do without, since apparently the north-men had naught to utter but barbarities and cruelties). Conversely, the natives rattle off in 21st century colloquial English. If the movie was primarily interested in authenticity (let alone objectivity), both languages -- Native and Norse -- should have been used (as in The Passion, where Latin, Hebrew, and Aramaic are maintained throughout). Moreover, if either of the two languages should have been rendered into English, logically it should have been Norse, which is at least etymologically related to English and in the same linguistic group. Of course, philological fidelity is not the movie-makers' primary interest; empathy by association is. Violent Vikings are left to babble unintelligently about fire, war, and iron, while Natives talk of love, peace, and courage -- all in very smooth English. Americans are supposed to identify with the natives, not their Norse co-linguists, nor, for millions of American viewers tracing their lineage to Scandinavia, their ancestors. Language manipulation aside, the depiction of Vikings as brutal warriors and plunderers is at least plausible and historic. The Native presentation, on the other hand, is neither. Indeed, the cultural anachronisms of Pathfinder suggest that 10th century natives were akin to modern-day liberals, easily "traumatized" and constantly in need of "therapy" and "reaffirmation" -- concepts wholly non-existent in the 10th century. From the start, a native woman encounters dead bodies and starts shrieking (she is "traumatized") and running madly -- as if living in 900 AD North America (or anywhere else at the time, for that matter) men, women, and children would not find the sight of rotting corpses banal. In the midst of this carnage, she happens upon a Viking boy who brandishes a sword at her. Instead of reacting instinctively -- fight-or-flight -- she casts a loving look at him as if to say "You poor boy; what have they done to you?" and embraces him.In fact, the main reasons that make the hero of the story, this same young Viking grown into manhood, agreeable, are his "liberal-therapeutic" tendencies. He has "daddy-issues" (his father beat and abandoned him for not being "man" enough) and is "confused" about his "identity," finally sloughing off his violent Viking (read: "white") heritage in favor of a sort of "multi-culti" native identity, thus making him the triumphant hero we can all support and identify with. Of course none of this should be surprising; neither presenting dead white men as the personification of evil nor presenting non-whites as the personification of good -- especially Native Americans, who have all but come to be the paradigmatic "noble other" who suffer countless and untold depredations at the hands of the white man. This theme is well rooted in popular culture, thanks to academia. Indeed, this motif is so ubiquitous that none other than Osama bin Laden exploits it to make white Americans feel shame and guilt.This "noble-victimized-non-white" paradigm has further come to be applied to almost all non-whites. For example, early sub-Saharans are always portrayed as a peaceful people who simply wanted to live and let live-until warlike white man came along. (Pointing out that it was fellow Africans who sold their kinsmen into slavery is unpopular in polite -- that is, white-guilt laden-conversation). [...]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pathfinder_(2007_film)
Plot summary The boy who would come to be named Ghost was with a group of Viking colonizers who planned to exterminate the local population. Their dragon ship was somehow destroyed with the passengers brutally killed, leaving Ghost as the traumatized sole surviver. A native woman finds Ghost in the wreckage and adopts him as her own son.Years later, Ghost remains tormented by his dreams, which along with his different appearance, interfere with his ability to fully assimilate into the community. He has feelings for a young woman from an allied tribe named Starfire, the daughter of Pathfinder, a man searching for a worthy successor.Later, while hunting and gathering with the group, a young girl from Ghost's tribe wanders off, encounters a Viking and is attacked. She escapes back to the village, but is followed by the Vikings. They raze the village and slaughter nearly everyone, except a few men whom they want to murder individually in "duels." Ghost arrives back at the village too late. The Vikings decide to make Ghost duel; he maims his opponent and escapes. Injured during the pursuit, he hides in a cave where he is found by the allied tribe's hunting party. They bring him home, and the warriors discuss taking the initiative against the Viking invaders. Ghost, however, warns them that their wood and stone weapons are no match for the Vikings' metal armour and blades. Ghost advises the villagers that their only chance of survival is to flee, and he departs to take on the Vikings alone.He finds that he has been covertly followed by a mute admirer. In an abandoned village, they set a series of traps. Starfire, meanwhile, has chosen to leave the tribe and finds Ghost and his colleague. The three kill the Vikings off individually, stealing armor and weapons. Pathfinder, like his daughter, also finds Ghost and joins the fight. Eventually, both the mute and Pathfinder are killed, and Ghost and Starfire are captured. Ghost is recognized as the son of a Viking. The Vikings threaten to torture Starfire if Ghost will not betray the location of other villages, so Ghost agrees to help the Vikings.Having gained the Vikings' trust, Ghost leads them along a dangerous mountain path. He insists that everyone be tied together to reduce the risk of members falling off the high cliff, and the Vikings do as he says. Clever Ghost then creates a domino effect so the entire string of Vikings falls over the cliff, all tied together. After a duel on the mountainside with the Viking leader, Ghost eventually shoves the invader off the edge of the cliff, ending his life. Ghost returns to Starfire with Pathfinder's necklace, thus making Starfire the new Pathfinder after her father. Ghost assumes his position as the Coast Watcher, bravest of their tribe.