Vast vast majority of white Americans have absolutely no connection to African slavery in America

source: http://downwithjugears.blogspot.com/

The Real Slave TradersFriday, January 02, 2009For decades, the White people of America have been subjected to a continual barrage from blacks and others that you and I are somehow responsible for the African slave trade and that we need to atone for our "guilt." There are a number of flaws with the idea that we are somehow responsible for the African slave trade. First of all, very few White people even owned slaves--slavery was a rich man's luxury and slavery did not exist amongst the middle and working classes of White people. Second of all, even if every one of us had an ancestor who owned slaves (which is an extremely unlikely proposition) it makes little sense to blame the children for the supposed sins of their fathers. Third of all, it is a fact that blacks sold their own kind into slavery. As this is the case, blacks are every bit as much to blame for slavery as are Whites. Arabs raided territories of negro tribes, enslaving the strong, killing the weak. Fourth, European Whites did not bring the slaves to America. On the contrary, it was the Asiatic Jews who brought them here (as Louis Farakhan has also pointed out.) Below is a listing of the Jewish slave ships and the Jewish owners of them.Abigail, Crown, Nassau, Four Sisters - (Anne & Eliza Prudent - Jews)Betty - (Aaron Lopez, Jew)Hester - (Moses Levy, Jew)Elizabeth - (Jacob Franks - Jew)Antigua - (Isaac Levy - Jew)Betsy - (Moses Levy - Jew)Polly White - (Justus Bosch and John Abrams - Jew) Horse and Expedition - (Mordecai and David Gomez - Jews)Charlotte - (Marston and Abram Lyell - Jews)Caracoa - (William de Woolf - Jew)Source: Elizabeth Donnan, 4 Volumes, Documents Illustrative of the History of the Slave Trade to America Washington, D.C. 1930, 1935 Carnegie Institute of Technology, Pittsburgh, Pa. So, my fellow White American, there is nothing whatsoever to feel guilty about concerning slavery. It is time to quit apologizing for something others are responsible for. Besides, approximately six hundred thousand White soldiers died in the American Civil War. Have you ever heard of blacks paying homage to or thanking these men?

I would also add the following important point. A very large percentage of the current white-European population of the United States are descendants of people who immigrated to North America after the 1860s and the period of the war between the Confederacy and the Union -- in the great immigration waves of the late 1800s and early 1900s. Therefore, these whites obviously could not have owned slaves. So knowing that at the time of slavery only the very rich actually owned slaves, and the vast majority of whites were poor rural farmers who did not own slaves...and knowing that a large portion of whites in America are descended from people who immigrated to the United States after slavery was outlawed as an institution...I would estimate that only 1-2% (if not lower) of white people in the United States today are descended from people who ever owned slaves.Furthermore, not all slaves in the Americas were black Africans. Although this fact has been white-washed from the jewish-controlled psuedo "history" taught today, there were thousands, if not millions, of white slaves as well.---------------------------------------------------------------Related:Suppressed History: White Slavery in Early America and Industrial Britain

Hymiewood's Obsession with Nazis; Communism Gets Kosher Pass

10 billion Jewish Hollywood movies, television specials, etc on the "monstrous evil" of the German Nazis and the mythical "murder of 6 million" precious Jews that never actually happened. Meanwhile, the Jewish Bolsheviks actually slaughtered ~60 million Russians and Ukranians, and the Chinese Communists actually killed 60+ million. And how many movies have the Jews made on those real genocides? I wonder why Jewish-inspired communism gets a pass, and WWII-era Germans are so unfairly vilified and defamed? http://etherzone.com/2008/beam121208.shtml

VALKYRIE - HOLLYWOOD TAKES A SAFE CRUISE (AGAIN)By: Roderick T. BeamanThe airways are plying ads for ongoing Christmas movie releases. One trailer is for Tom Cruise’s Valkyrie. Anyone who has had access to the internet for the past few years is aware that the filming of the movie ran onto some resistance in Germany due to Cruise’s Scientology which is discouraged through much of Europe. We’ve seen the pictures of Cruise with an eyepatch in a German uniform. His character lost his eye in the African campaign. The trailer shows the officers plotting to kill Adolf Hitler and some of the dialogue concerns how it is to be for the good of Germany. There’s an attache case with the bomb that is meant to kill him. Hitler escaped and there was a purging of much of the German military leadership. I understand that Hollywood is abuzz over the movie with talk of Oscar nominations abounding. It’s directed by Brian Singer who did a sterling job with ‘The Usual Suspects’. Of course, Cruise and the other personnel are being hailed for producing this. Hollywood never ceases congratulating itself for stomping on a dead ideology. It’s being hailed as a taut thriller. Aren’t they all? The movie brings to 10,582 the number of Hollywood movies that have focused on the evil of Hitler, the Nazis, various Neo-Nazi plots and WWII Germany as our enemy. I think the number of Hollywood movies to focus on the danger of communism have been two, Gregory Peck’s ‘The Chairman’ and ‘The Killing Fields’ but the former only did it obliquely. I can’t think of a single other one and neither focused on the Soviet Union. [...]The horrors of Germany and Europe under National Socialism have never been too far from Hollywood’s consciousness. Indeed, the capture in 1960 of Adolf Eichmann by the Mossad in Argentina and his subsequent trial and hanging in Jerusalem prompted a flood of books and movie and television productions about the extermination program. By contrast, we never encounter a Russian, a Red Chinese or a Castroite Cuban as some kind of a menace, bent on our destruction. No, that only seems to emerge from National Socialist Germany. The fact is that the German concentration camps were liberated 63 years ago and the remaining personnel from them must be fewer than 1,000 by now. By contrast, the Gulag was only broken up in 1953, after Stalin’s death. The reeducation camps of Mao-Tse Tung persisted to after his death in 1976. The outrages of Cambodia occurred at the end of Mao’s life. Surely, many of the people involved in those horrors are still alive. Where is the clamor for them to face justice? It sure isn’t coming from Hollywood![...]

Taking 'White Guilt™' back to the Viking Times

You could spend months and years analyzing all the anti-white and race-mixing propaganda from the Jews'Media, Talmudvision, and Hymiewood, and still not cover it all -- but the 2007 movie Pathfinder is particularly bold. Here's the plot summary: A young Viking boy in the Americas around 900 A.D. is raised by native 'Indians', takes a liking to a native girl, and feels guilty for the mass slaughter of natives by the invading Vikings, so he decides to betray his own people and help the natives wage war against the Vikings. In the end, he successfully helps the natives defeat the Vikings, and becomes a leader in a native tribe. Whites betraying and destroying their own people, mongrelizing their genetics with other races, and happily participating in the genocide of their own kind? A Jewish dream come true! http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/12/on_vikings_and_victims_whitegu.html

On Vikings and Victims: White-Guilt in ContextBy Raymond IbrahimDecember 14, 2008 All-permeating "white-guilt" did not appear out of thin air. It has taken a sustained propaganda effort, a wide-ranging mobilization of education and culture, to inculcate and sustain self-loathing among American Caucasians. Like the Coca-Cola TM brand, white-guilt needs endless repetition to remain struck in the thought and behavioral processes of the masses.The movie Pathfinder, which I saw on cable, offers a vivid example of the sort of brainwashing intended to refresh the white-guilt TM brand in the thinking habits of young people in particular. Set around 900 AD, the film deals with Viking incursions into North America. The Vikings are portrayed as ironclad giants -- more monster than human -- mounted atop massive Clydesdales, barking and grunting obscenities in some strange tongue; the natives, as expected, gentle, innocent, and peace-loving. This theme, of course, is not new.Subtleties playing on white-guilt, however, are spread throughout. Consider the usage of language. The Vikings speak only Norse, with English subtitles (though the viewer could do without, since apparently the north-men had naught to utter but barbarities and cruelties). Conversely, the natives rattle off in 21st century colloquial English. If the movie was primarily interested in authenticity (let alone objectivity), both languages -- Native and Norse -- should have been used (as in The Passion, where Latin, Hebrew, and Aramaic are maintained throughout). Moreover, if either of the two languages should have been rendered into English, logically it should have been Norse, which is at least etymologically related to English and in the same linguistic group. Of course, philological fidelity is not the movie-makers' primary interest; empathy by association is. Violent Vikings are left to babble unintelligently about fire, war, and iron, while Natives talk of love, peace, and courage -- all in very smooth English. Americans are supposed to identify with the natives, not their Norse co-linguists, nor, for millions of American viewers tracing their lineage to Scandinavia, their ancestors. Language manipulation aside, the depiction of Vikings as brutal warriors and plunderers is at least plausible and historic. The Native presentation, on the other hand, is neither. Indeed, the cultural anachronisms of Pathfinder suggest that 10th century natives were akin to modern-day liberals, easily "traumatized" and constantly in need of "therapy" and "reaffirmation" -- concepts wholly non-existent in the 10th century. From the start, a native woman encounters dead bodies and starts shrieking (she is "traumatized") and running madly -- as if living in 900 AD North America (or anywhere else at the time, for that matter) men, women, and children would not find the sight of rotting corpses banal. In the midst of this carnage, she happens upon a Viking boy who brandishes a sword at her. Instead of reacting instinctively -- fight-or-flight -- she casts a loving look at him as if to say "You poor boy; what have they done to you?" and embraces him.In fact, the main reasons that make the hero of the story, this same young Viking grown into manhood, agreeable, are his "liberal-therapeutic" tendencies. He has "daddy-issues" (his father beat and abandoned him for not being "man" enough) and is "confused" about his "identity," finally sloughing off his violent Viking (read: "white") heritage in favor of a sort of "multi-culti" native identity, thus making him the triumphant hero we can all support and identify with. Of course none of this should be surprising; neither presenting dead white men as the personification of evil nor presenting non-whites as the personification of good -- especially Native Americans, who have all but come to be the paradigmatic "noble other" who suffer countless and untold depredations at the hands of the white man. This theme is well rooted in popular culture, thanks to academia. Indeed, this motif is so ubiquitous that none other than Osama bin Laden exploits it to make white Americans feel shame and guilt.This "noble-victimized-non-white" paradigm has further come to be applied to almost all non-whites. For example, early sub-Saharans are always portrayed as a peaceful people who simply wanted to live and let live-until warlike white man came along. (Pointing out that it was fellow Africans who sold their kinsmen into slavery is unpopular in polite -- that is, white-guilt laden-conversation). [...]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pathfinder_(2007_film)

Plot summary The boy who would come to be named Ghost was with a group of Viking colonizers who planned to exterminate the local population. Their dragon ship was somehow destroyed with the passengers brutally killed, leaving Ghost as the traumatized sole surviver. A native woman finds Ghost in the wreckage and adopts him as her own son.Years later, Ghost remains tormented by his dreams, which along with his different appearance, interfere with his ability to fully assimilate into the community. He has feelings for a young woman from an allied tribe named Starfire, the daughter of Pathfinder, a man searching for a worthy successor.Later, while hunting and gathering with the group, a young girl from Ghost's tribe wanders off, encounters a Viking and is attacked. She escapes back to the village, but is followed by the Vikings. They raze the village and slaughter nearly everyone, except a few men whom they want to murder individually in "duels." Ghost arrives back at the village too late. The Vikings decide to make Ghost duel; he maims his opponent and escapes. Injured during the pursuit, he hides in a cave where he is found by the allied tribe's hunting party. They bring him home, and the warriors discuss taking the initiative against the Viking invaders. Ghost, however, warns them that their wood and stone weapons are no match for the Vikings' metal armour and blades. Ghost advises the villagers that their only chance of survival is to flee, and he departs to take on the Vikings alone.He finds that he has been covertly followed by a mute admirer. In an abandoned village, they set a series of traps. Starfire, meanwhile, has chosen to leave the tribe and finds Ghost and his colleague. The three kill the Vikings off individually, stealing armor and weapons. Pathfinder, like his daughter, also finds Ghost and joins the fight. Eventually, both the mute and Pathfinder are killed, and Ghost and Starfire are captured. Ghost is recognized as the son of a Viking. The Vikings threaten to torture Starfire if Ghost will not betray the location of other villages, so Ghost agrees to help the Vikings.Having gained the Vikings' trust, Ghost leads them along a dangerous mountain path. He insists that everyone be tied together to reduce the risk of members falling off the high cliff, and the Vikings do as he says. Clever Ghost then creates a domino effect so the entire string of Vikings falls over the cliff, all tied together. After a duel on the mountainside with the Viking leader, Ghost eventually shoves the invader off the edge of the cliff, ending his life. Ghost returns to Starfire with Pathfinder's necklace, thus making Starfire the new Pathfinder after her father. Ghost assumes his position as the Coast Watcher, bravest of their tribe.

Lifting the Blame on Spanish Colonists for Native American Deaths

http://www.davidduke.com/general/lifting-the-blame-of-spaniards-for-native-american-deaths_6327.html#more-6327Lifting the Blame on Spanish Colonists for Native American DeathsAncestors of European Americans have long been blamed for the deaths of millions of native populations after the arrival of Columbus. It is commonly held that Americans of European descent are retroactively complicit in the widespread loss of life due to disease in the 16th century. This loss of millions of lives is viewed by many historians as deliberate. Such blaming has lead to militant Hispanic hatred of Whites in America and the rhetoric that Hispanic immigrants “have got to eliminate the gringo”, that they “have got to kill him, as well as expressed intentions to seize the American southwest, an area they call “Atzlan”. A Mexican epidemiologist, Rodolfo Acuna-Soto, made some research discoveries that muddle claims of intentional genocide by the Spanish: Smallpox seems to have existed in America before the arrival of the Spanish colonists, and the epidemics of 1545 and 1576 “seem to be another disease altogether“. His work demonstrates how vitally important ongoing historical research is to reality and to the protection of the rights of innocent people in the 21st century, in this case, the right of European Americans to exist in America. -Staff 2http://discovermagazine.com/2006/feb/megadeath-in-mexico

Megadeath in MexicoEpidemics followed the Spanish arrival in the New World, but the worst killer may have been a shadowy native—a killer that could still be out there.by Bruce Stutzpublished online February 21, 2006When Hernando Cortés and his Spanish army of fewer than a thousand men stormed into Mexico in 1519, the native population numbered about 22 million. By the end of the century, following a series of devastating epidemics, only 2 million people remained. Even compared with the casualties of the Black Death, the mortality rate was extraordinarily high. Mexican epidemiologist Rodolfo Acuña-Soto refers to it as the time of “megadeath.” The toll forever altered the culture of Mesoamerica and branded the Spanish as the worst kind of conquerors, those from foreign lands who kill with their microbes as well as their swords.The notion that European colonialists brought sickness when they came to the New World was well established by the 16th century. Native populations in the Americas lacked immunities to common European diseases like smallpox, measles, and mumps. Within 20 years of Columbus’s arrival, smallpox had wiped out at least half the people of the West Indies and had begun to spread to the South American mainland.In 1565 a Spanish royal judge who had investigated his country’s colony in Mexico wrote:It is certain that from the day that D. Hernando Cortés, the Marquis del Valle, entered this land, in the seven years, more or less, that he conquered and governed it, the natives suffered many deaths, and many terrible dealings, robberies and oppressions were inflicted on them, taking advantage of their persons and their lands, without order, weight nor measure; . . . the people diminished in great number, as much due to excessive taxes and mistreatment, as to illness and smallpox, such that now a very great and notable fraction of the people are gone. . . .There seemed little reason to debate the nature of the plague: Even the Spanish admitted that European smallpox was the disease that devastated the conquered Aztec empire. Case closed.Then, four centuries later, Acuña-Soto improbably decided to reopen the investigation. Some key pieces of information—details that had been sitting, ignored, in the archives—just didn’t add up. His studies of ancient documents revealed that the Aztecs were familiar with smallpox, perhaps even before Cortés arrived. They called it zahuatl. Spanish colonists wrote at the time that outbreaks of zahuatl occurred in 1520 and 1531 and, typical of smallpox, lasted about a year. As many as 8 million people died from those outbreaks. But the epidemic that appeared in 1545, followed by another in 1576, seemed to be another disease altogether. The Aztecs called those outbreaks by a separate name, cocolitzli. “For them, cocolitzli was something completely different and far more virulent,” Acuña-Soto says. “Cocolitzli brought incomparable devastation that passed readily from one region to the next and killed quickly.”After 12 years of research, Acuña-Soto has come to agree with the Aztecs: The cocolitzli plagues of the mid-16th century probably had nothing to do with smallpox. In fact, they probably had little to do with the Spanish invasion. But they probably did have an origin that is worth knowing about in 2006. [...]

Read the rest here.

End This Evil Holocaust Deception - Cultural-Racial Genocide of Germany is First; Rest of Europe and the West to Follow

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=8619End This Evil Holocaust Deception By Mike James in Germany Just eight months ago, a neighbour of mine gave birth to one of the most astonishingly beautiful babies I have ever seen in my life. Angelika is a giggling, blue-eyed little cherub whose irrepressible curiosity and propensity for breaking things to see what’s inside of them sometimes drives her mother to distraction. She laughs easily, and is delighted by almost everything and everyone she sees.Angelika is a child of God. She is German, healthy, intuitive, highly intelligent and a naturally loving and trusting little human being with an enormous potential for creativity. She represents the future of a vibrantly free humanity and is a potential exemplar of true womanhood. She embodies everything the Jews hate and wish to destroy.Within just a few years, this child will be exposed to the monstrous evil of a blood libel that will make her forever loathe her own parentage and nation. Her mind will be poisoned by teachers who will tell her wicked lies about things that simply did not happen and she will be told that Christianity is at the heart of “anti-Semitism”. In line with the Jew Morgenthau’s hatred of the German people and his belief that all Germans are genetically evil and should be castrated at birth [2], she will be taught that she has blood on her hands simply for being born into one of the most remarkable races of human beings that ever walked the face of this planet.Will Angelika be one of the many thousands of young Germans who eventually abandon their beautiful country for fear of the Jews or hatred of their own kind, never to return? Or will she willingly accept her place as a tax-slave to the illegal, devil-worshipping Ashkenazi state of Israel and bow down to the occult six-pointed star, the Mark of the Beast? [3]The odds are that she will, because the German government is currently doing everything it can to replace ethnic Germans with Semites and Asiatics in an unprecedented drive to radically restructure the demographics of one of the world’s greatest nations. Germany’s Interior Minister, the “conservative” Wolfgang Schäuble, recently announced that the 120,000 Germans who leave their nation in despair each year can easily be replaced by fast-tracking hordes of uneducated immigrants toward German citizenship.[...]I have been living in Germany for almost 16 years, and it breaks my heart to see these wonderfully talented and big-hearted people crippled and disfigured by the lies of cockroaches to such an extent that they learn to despise and mistrust their own shadows. So much has changed in the time I have been here that it would be impossible for me to chronicle the magnitude of this cultural genocide within the bounds of a single article; and yet this is a process that has been ongoing since 1945.Why should this concern non-German Europeans, such as the British, Irish, Americans, Canadians, Australians and other ancestral Europeans? Because, whether you wish to admit it or not, the German people are our forebears, our progenitors, our warrior ancestors. It was from that great Teutonic race that the Saxons, Angles, Franks, Celts, Nordics and Scandinavians derived. Germany is our linguistic and cultural Motherland, and yet we are content to watch culturally barbaric Jews rape the minds of her children while we smugly deride their virtues and support the demonic, Antichrist state of Israel.But you are next.Because those of you who are observant enough to detect the shift in nuances slyly propagated by the Zionist media may have noticed that the blame for the fictional “holocaust” is now being shuffled off onto Europeans in general. The reason for this is two-fold. The European Union, having fully absorbed an ethnically cleansed Germany as a sovereign state, is expected to pay the ever-continuing tribute to Israel and its “holocaust” survivors (who seem to multiply by the day). It also justifies the compulsory inculcation of European children in the lies that constitute the Satanic fables of Judaism and Zionism, providing a sufficient grounding for their eventual acceptance of the Noahide Laws of the Jewish-Communist new world order.As an English schoolchild, my schooling and the BBC propaganda to which I was exposed impressed upon me the manifold evils of those awful Nazis and their heartless cruelty. It took me many of years of hard study in search of the truth to realise that I had been lied to for most of my life. Admittedly, I had the advantage of reading books in England that are forbidden in Germany and, later, the linguistic capacity to read Verboten literature in the original German, which I obtained through sympathetic book dealers who continue to preserve the truth at great risk to their liberty.It is, of course, a heresy of the highest order for anyone to reassess Hitler and his National Socialist movement in an objective capacity; and although I remain at heart a national libertarian, I have, over the past three years, arrived at a profound understanding of why Hitler was the right man, in the right place, at the right time. And that time has come again, for a Volksgemeinschaft is our only chance of survival should we wish to remain free. [...]The “holocaust” deception is lethal, for indeed the entire world turns on the pivot of this fantastically creative and malicious lie. It has justified the senseless slaughter of millions of Christians by way of manipulatively steered wars and the slow-motion genocide of the rightful inhabitants of Palestine. It has caused the destruction and desecration of nations such as Iraq and the Lebanon and yet still threatens to bring us all to the brink of a nuclear holocaust over the issue of Iran’s legal, sovereign rights to develop her own nuclear capability.The deception has given free reign to those who have plunged the entire world into an escalating inflationary cycle of ever-increasing fuel and commodities costs and an economic crisis that threatens to deprive millions of basic food staples and plunge entire nations into civil wars exacerbated by Jewish-inspired mass immigration laws.The ruinous speculation of Jewish banking cartels (who moved their real wealth out of the markets into gold and real estate at the end of 2006) has guaranteed for us and our children decades of incremental inflation, the escalating outsourcing of manufacturing and labour to the lowest bidder, the liquidation of properly functioning public utilities, and the complete levelling down of western nations to the status of banana republics.We accept all this because we are afraid of identifying the real enemy of humanity by name, because it is a name that will forever be associated with the victimology of the fictional “holocaust” narrative. Let’s be polite and just call them “Zionists”, or “international bankers”, or the “Illuminati”, or whatever else comes to mind. So afraid of the Jews we are, that we would rather starve or die in a nuclear inferno rather than name them for the evil bastards that they are and take appropriate action against them. [...]------------------------------------------------------------------------Related:Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax