Showing posts with label Urbanistas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Urbanistas. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 8, 2008

PALOUSITICS EXCLUSIVE - Wal-Mart: What's Next? Part Four

This is Part Four of a series of articles that will explore what happens when a Wal-Mart Supercenter comes to town.

The information contained below is being made publicly available on the web for the first time.


In 2003, after Wal-Mart announced plans to construct a Supercenter in the Olympic Peninsula town of Sequim, WA, a small, vocal group of snobs got together and decided to oppose it. They called themselves "Sequim First." These opponents of "cookie-cutter development" picked a cookie-cutter name right out of Weird Al Norman's playbook (e.g. "Give it [your Wal-Mart hating club] a short, upbeat name like 'Freeport First.'”) Sheesh.

Sequim First's tactics will sound very familiar to Pullman readers. Initially, the city council approved the project. Then Sequim First filed a lawsuit appealing the SEPA approval and the decision not to require an independent Environmental Impact Statement to the Thurston County Superior Court. The group cited significant impacts to stormwater runoff, traffic, emergency services, water supply, and other municipal services, and damaging effects on the downtown core. The court rejected the appeal on March 19, 2004. Sequim First then appealed to the state Court of Appeals in June. Nevertheless, the new Wal-Mart opened on October 22, 2004. [Note: On August 18, 2005, Sequim First wrote to the Department of Ecology requesting that Sequim be added to the same costly NPDES Phase II stormwater permitting that Pullman is saddled with, because of "the continued emphasis on almost-uncontrolled growth in Sequim." Gotta love the spitefulness of these urbanistas.]

So what happened next?

Michael Luis & Associates, a public affairs, communications and civic leadership consulting firm in the Seattle area, has prepared profiles assessing the impact of the opening of Wal-Mart stores in communities throughout Washington. The one concerning Sequim can be downloaded here.

Some highlights (notice the similarities with Pullman):
  • ...sales in retail stores in Sequim and Clallam County as a whole were relatively flat in the first part of the decade. Sales began to pick up steam across the county in 2004, and especially in Sequim, where Wal-Mart opened in October.

    Not all of the increase in retail store activity in 2004 and 2005 was due to Wal-Mart, however. ...sales at stores in Sequim, other than Wal-Mart, [saw] a substantial bump upward in 2004 and 2005. The opening of the Wal-Mart clearly did not hamper overall progress in retail expansion in Sequim.

  • ...only a few small stores closed after Wal-Mart opened, and those were owned by people who were ready to retire and close up shop anyway. Mayor Schubert, whose professional background is in retail, believes Wal-Mart’s arrival was a useful “kick in the backside for local retailers. It forced them to get on the ball.”

  • The strict lids that have been instituted on property tax collections in Washington have kept these taxes from rising in areas without substantial new construction. Thus, in a city like Sequim, municipal finances have begun to rely more on sales tax for growth. ...sales tax collections in Sequim have increased substantially as large new retailers have opened in the city.

    ...four revenue sources...generated about $2.5 million in 2001, or about $575 per resident. This had increased to $3.9 million by 2005, or about $835 per resident. By
    accommodating Wal-Mart and other retailers, Sequim stemmed the leakage of sales tax revenue to Port Angeles and other communities, and captured tax revenue from shoppers living in surrounding unincorporated areas.

  • Between 1995 and 2005, while the population of Clallam County grew by 10 percent, retail employment grew by over 40 percent. Overall employment in the county has been growing steadily, and the current unemployment rate, about 5.5 percent, is low by recent historic standards. Schubert says that with employers like Wal-Mart, “people who didn’t have jobs eight years ago now have jobs.”

  • As Sequim grew from a small rural town to an important tourist destination and retirement community, local retailing did not keep pace. Local retailers were adept at catering to visitors, but not at filling basic needs of residents, many of whom are on fixed incomes. Wal-Mart and other big box retailers have met this need, saving local residents from having to drive to Port Angeles or Silverdale.
  • Wednesday: We'll take a look at the effects of a Wal-Mart that opened in the Seattle suburb of Covington.

    Technorati Tags:

    Monday, July 7, 2008

    Our Local Urbanistas Versus Wal-Mart

    Rabid Wal-Mart hater Tom Hansen sent select Venom 2020 subscribers a link to a website containing essays by Richard Carson, a professional urban planner in Oregon. For some reason, Carson's essay titled "The Urbanistas versus Big-Box Retail" was not on Hansen's list of favorites.

    Carson totally skewers all the big-box bashers like Hansen, No Super Wal-Mart, PARD, et. al.

    Some great quotes:
    Unfortunately, too often people blur the line between land use issues and social issues. These days big-box is intentionally being associated with "suburban sprawl". But the illusion created by special-interest propaganda is the real issue. It is not necessarily about the economic or social reality. What we really have going on is the usual symbolism over substance tactics that are typical of many anti-growth organizations. Americans believe in a free citizenry and a free market economy. However, the Urbanistas do not believe in a free market when it comes to big box retail and they want citizens to live in their urban design fantasy land. They believe Americans need to be forced to live Potemkin villages reminiscent of the movie "The Truman Show".

    In order for these social engineers to attract financial supporters and sympathetic voters, they use pejorative labels like "sprawl," "big-box" or "McMansion" and "category killers". They intentional play on the average citizen's distrust of corporate American and their tendency to say "Not in my back yard" in the face of any community change.

    [snip]

    In my opinion, the "Urbanistas" need to start dealing with the retail reality that Main Street America literally buys into big-box retail, and dump their negative rhetoric and their unsellable political agenda. May be they should take a tip from big-box retail and actually give American citizens something they actually care about. Like a political agenda that has an actual tangible value.
    Al Norman has taken that "special-interest propaganda" nationwide and makes a nice living off of it.

    Read the whole thing and learn the true agenda behind our "neighborhood activists."

    Technorati Tags: