The Theory of Evolution Deception

Is the Theory of Evolution hard science or ridiculous nonsense?

The original motive behind Darwin's theory

Charles Darwin, a staunch opponent of slavery who once considered becoming a minister, proposed the theory in order to attempt to argue for the lie of the common descent of 'mankind'. [1] His book, On the Origin of Species, was published in 1859.












The important distinction between 'Micro evolution', i.e. adaptations within a species, vs. 'Macro evolution'

Changes in the frequency of genetic traits of a species due to "natural selection", the process by which individual organisms with beneficial traits are more likely to survive and reproduce, is logical. This we may term "micro evolution." A classic cited example is that of the peppered moth (right), in which it is claimed the light-colored moths within the species almost died off due to predation when trees were darkened with soot from pollution.

But 'Macro Evolution' -- the theory that species can transform into other species, and that all species originated from a common ancestor which spontaneously erupted from non-complex inorganic chemical matter -- is an entirely different matter.









A preposterous fairytale

Cursory consideration and objective thought destroys the theory. How is it remotely possible that 'primordial soup' can turn into infinitely complex living organisms due to nothing more than random chance and passage of time? Common sense, let alone a mathematician, will tell you the statistical odds of this happening are nil.











The fossil record does not support evolution - Where are the transitional fossils?

If evolution actually occurred, there should be millions of so-called "transitional fossils". For instance, were the theory true, there should be fossils of half wolf, half dolphin [2] and half ape, half human creatures. Yet, not a single genuine transitional fossil has ever been found. This is why there are so many "missing links."

So where is the evidence to support evolution?









Genetic mutations are harmful, not beneficial

Evolution would require the "appearance" of new genetic information out of nowhere, and constant genetic mutation for the creation of new species. Yet, genetic mutations have almost always been observed to be harmful, not beneficial. Scientists have never found an example of the addition of appreciable new and beneficial genetic information to the gene pool of a species. Yet this should be occurring all the time, with millions of examples were evolution true.












Theory of Evolution Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics

The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that disorder and decay is constantly increasing in the universe. Evolution, on the other hand, claims that the universe is constantly tending towards higher and higher order via random chance. Evolutionists still try their best to explain away this problem.










Fraudulent "Evidence"

Surely, 'eminent' and world famous "scientists" such as Jewish evolutionary "biologist" Stephen Jay Gould (right), couldn't be intentionally lying to us?

Shockingly, it turns out the minuscule purported "evidence" used to support the theory is a plethora of hoaxes and lies - including such notorious frauds as Haeckel's faked embryo drawings, Piltdown Man, and Nebraska Man.










Ernst Haeckel's faked embryo drawings

Naturalist Ernst Haeckel's embryo drawings falsified the embryos of different animals in order to promote the idea that different species were very similar in the embryonic stage of development. This of course, is purported "evidence" of the common ancestry of all organisms. These drawings are still widely used in school textbooks as "proof" of evolution.










'Piltdown Man' Hoax

In 1912, Charles Dawson, an amateur archaeologist, claimed to have found bones of a primitive hominid (a "missing link") in a quarry near Piltdown Common in Sussex, England. Piltdown Man was constructed from parts of a modern-looking skull and an apelike lower jaw.

Piltdown man was claimed to be 500,000 years old and declared "absolute proof" of evolution in museums, academia, and countless newspapers and scientific journals.

The fraud went undetected for forty years. In 1953, Piltdown was discovered to be a forgery, consisting of the lower jawbone of an orangutan that had been deliberately combined with the skull of a fully developed modern human.










'Nebraska Man' Fraud

Nebraska Man was discovered in 1922 in western Nebraska. It was hailed as the "missing link" in human evolution which allegedly lived 1 million years ago. This "evidence" was used by evolutionists in the famous Scopes evolution trial in Dayton, Tennessee, in 1925.

What exactly was this discovery? It was a single tooth, which turned out to be the tooth of an extinct species of pig.











A theory taught as if it is a fact

When 'professor' Shlomo Greenbaumstein at the local jewish-controlled university teaches that the theory of evolution is "established fact", "proven", and "beyond question", impressionable students dare not question or risk being castigated as a "nutball Creationist."









Organized Jewry and their lackeys know a useful lie when they see it

Jewry, Satan's foot soldiers, are ultimately behind the promotion of the 'secular humanist' and atheist philosophies. The theory of evolution is pontificated as 'gospel truth' in the jewish-controlled 'mainstream' media, and jewish-dominated and controlled universities and government-run 'schools'.

Protocol IX: "We have fooled, bemused and corrupted the youth of the goyim by rearing them in principles and theories which are known to us to be false although it is by us that they have been inculcated."

Protocol IV: "It is indispensable for us to undermine all faith, to tear out of the minds of the Goyim the very principle of the Godhead and the spirit and to put in its place arithmetical calculations and material needs."









Evolution is not science, but a religion

Evolution is the centerpiece of the "scientific justification" for 'secular humanist' atheism.

It takes far more "faith" to believe that the entire universe just came together by random chance than it does to believe that a Creator must exist.












Evolution shills have no use for logic, facts, truth, and free & open debate

Teaching of 'intelligent design' is verboten in the jewish-controlled indoctrination 'schools.' Only lies, frauds, and hoaxes are allowed. Real scientists and professors who question the orthodoxy find themselves out of a job. In 'scientific' circles, evolutionists prefer to promulgate more theories to support the central theory. All that matters is that they have a justification for their need to advocate a rejection of 'God'.









What's next?

In 10 million more years, will humans 'evolve' into 12-foot tall, 4-armed, purple-skinned, winged humanoids?

One of the most absurd lies in history

Real "science" is a search for the truth, and is based on logic, observation, and factual evidence. Evolutionary theory is not science, and flies in the face of logic and evidence. It is rather a labyrinth of lies, frauds, half-truths, and baseless theories concocted by ideologues out to advance an atheistic agenda. The real wonder is that so many people are duped by these charlatans.

Related Articles:

- Charles Darwin's theory of evolution not based on empirical research, but put forth to justify common descent of all humanity
- Pew Research Center Poll: 63% of Americans reject theory of evolution; 64% favor teaching creationism in public schools


Other Articles of Interest:

- The myth of the "brotherhood" of humanity; Adam not the first man, but father of only the white race
- The Roots of 'Anti-Semitism' - Why Do People Hate the Jews?
- Racial origin of the "Jews"; not Israelites, but descendants of Khazars, Edomites, Canaanites, Cain, and ultimately Satan
- An introduction to 'The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion' - Blueprint for Jewish World Conquest
- Bible does not say that Earth is only 6,000 years old, only that Adam & Eve created 6,000 years ago - Life existed in previous ages, then destroyed
- The Flood of Noah Was Not Worldwide

Charles Darwin's theory of evolution not based on empirical research, but put forth to justify common descent of all humanity

So says a new book on Darwin. Thanks to The White Christ for this find:

Charles Darwin, Abolitionist

By CHRISTOPHER BENFEY
NY Times
Published: January 29, 2009

Charles Darwin, a 22-year-old dropout from medical school who subsequently considered becoming a priest, boarded the Beagle in late 1831 and spent five years on the ship, traveling the world and collecting natural specimens. Despite its cuddly name, the Beagle was a naval brig outfitted with 10 guns. Darwin was a “gentleman dining companion” whose official responsibility was to provide civilized banter with the captain.

Darwin visited Tierra del Fuego, Tahiti and Tasmania, along with other exotic locales, but he never set foot in the United States. Around 1850, charmed by popular tales of lush country­side and the exciting adventures of the Underground Railroad, and still withholding from public view his explosive theory of evolution, he flirted briefly with the idea of moving his large family, with seven children under the age of 11 and another on the way, to Ohio. The middle states, he wrote, are “what I fancy most.”

Two arresting new books, timed to co­incide with Darwin’s 200th birthday, make the case that his epochal achievement in Victorian England can best be under­stood in relation to events — involving neither tortoises nor finches — on the other side of the Atlantic. Both books confront the touchy subject of Darwin and race head on; both conclude that Darwin, despite the pernicious spread of “social Darwinism” (the notion, popularized by Herbert Spencer, that human society progresses through the “survival of the fittest”), was no racist.

Adrian Desmond and James Moore published a highly regarded biography of Darwin in 1991. The argument of their new book, “Darwin’s Sacred Cause,” is bluntly stated in its subtitle: “How a Hatred of Slavery Shaped Darwin’s Views on Human Evolution.” They set out to overturn the widespread view that Darwin was a “tough-minded scientist” who unflinchingly followed the trail of empirical research until it led to the stunning and unavoidable theory of evolution. This narrative, they claim, is precisely backward. “Darwin’s starting point,” they write, “was the abolitionist belief in blood kinship, a ‘common descent’ ” of all human beings.

[...]

Commentary from The White Christ:

It was noted in a comment on this latest column, that Darwin- the ‘arch-enemy of conservative Christians’ and, of course, the friend of the ‘atheist evolutionists’ - was, actually, not a rabid atheist, but was another sort of rabid fool - a died in the wool Abolitionist!

[...]

Darwin, who had to be pushed and prodded by Huxley to get this book in print, wrote ‘Origin’ initially, NOT because he believed in the ‘theory of evolution,’ BUT because he viewed the Black and White races as equal in GOD’s EYES, and wanted to prove it ‘scientifically’!!! HE BELIEVED not IN THE THEORY OF Evolution, but in THE THEORY OF MISCEGENATION as ’survival of the fittest’!

[...]

Darwin, (who wrote Origins to counter the increasing weight of Victorian science- and scientists- that were proving the superiority of the White Man in his: cranial capacity; his IQ; his inventiveness; his altruism and other positive moral traits; his ability in all fields, in short, he SUPERIORITY over the other Races to RULE and REIGN; in short, what eventually became both his blessing and his curse- the so-called ‘White Man’s Burden’ – BOTH existed at the height of the Victorian
era, and Darwin was in an existential pickle. Believing as he did, he felt that the ‘lesser races’ were to be pitied (as only a Better does to his Inferior,
whether of class, station, or race…), and, spineless as he was, Darwin could not reconcile his universalism with his knowledge of Christendom- which had
existed (if at all) because it, and IT ALONE, had been given grace, by long association with Christ, the Church, and the Holy Spirit dwelling with ‘His People’ [Matt. 1:21].

Precisely because Darwin felt that it was wrong of God to choose one race over the other, and thought the lies and heretical stances of the Abolitionists superior to the Almighty, as knowing more than God, (who ‘hath appointed the bounds of their habitations,’ and who long ago, had ‘given this land into your hands, and taken it from the Jebusites, and Perrizites, and Amorites, etc.)

Darwin was saying GOD WAS WRONG in creating a race of slave/servant, and used his sophomoric science to prove ‘racial equality’!!!

Pew Research Center Poll: 63% of Americans reject theory of evolution; 64% favor teaching creationism in public schools

63% - Reject Darwin's Theory of Evolution

Yahoo News | Thu Feb 12, 2009

In the 150 years since he published his groundbreaking On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, and the 200 years since the date of his birth celebrated this week, Charles Darwin has failed to convince the majority of Americans of the validity of his theories; an August 2006 survey by the Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life and the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, found that 63% of Americans say they believe that humans and other animals have either always existed in their present form or have evolved over time under the guidance of a supreme being while only 26% say that life evolved solely through processes such as natural selection. A similar Pew Research Center poll, released in August 2005, found that 64% of Americans support teaching creationism alongside evolution in the classroom.

Related:

Half of Britons reject the theory of evolution

Half of Britons reject the theory of evolution

Half of Britons do not believe in evolution, survey finds

Riazat Butt, religious affairs correspondent
guardian.co.uk
Sunday 1 February 2009

Half of British adults do not believe in evolution, with at least 22% preferring the theories of creationism or intelligent design to explain how the world came about, according to a survey.

The poll found that 25% of Britons believe Charles Darwin's theory of evolution is "definitely true", with another quarter saying it is "probably true". Half of the 2,060 people questioned were either strongly opposed to the theory or confused about it.

[...]

full story