Showing posts with label Israelite Identity Christianity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Israelite Identity Christianity. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 27, 2010

"Anti-government, survivalist, white supremacist Christian Identity" individuals targetted as most dangerous enemies of JOG

Erroll Southers is Barack Obamas nominee to head the Transportation Safety Administration — the TSA, that organization that screens passengers getting on airplanes. [1]




Erroll Southers: "Most of the domestic groups that we have to pay attention to here are white supremacist groups. They're anti-government, in most cases anti-abortion. They are usually survivalist type of nature, Identity oriented.

[...]

Those groups are groups that claim to be extremely anti-government and Christian Identity oriented."

Thursday, December 24, 2009

MUST READ: "Blueprint for Bondage" by Scott D. McQuate






I read this book almost two years ago, and it is probably the most eye-opening and important book (aside from the Bible), I've read. It is from the "Christian Identity" perspective and for the serious truthseeker, with stunning insights into the true meanings of the Scriptures (which have been hidden by deceptive translations), including much information that will be new and challenging even to those immersed in CI (eg, exposing a certain false apostle). I would also highly recommend it for those who are agnostic or irreligious, as the book provides key knowledge regarding the origin of the "NWO conspiracy" (ie, the Edomite Jews who are the sons of Cain, who was the son of Satan). The author is "on target" on virtually every issue, covering a wide range of topics critical to the "Christian" truly seeking to obey YHWH.





Info on the book from the official website:

Blueprint For Bondage
Has Already Been Highly Acclaimed And Heralded As A Classic By Readers All Around The World. It Is The Result Of Years Of Painstaking Research By A PhD Candidate From Ohio Who Stunned His Professors By Uncovering An Ancient Coded Message, Written By Freemasons, Within The Ancient Hebrew Language Of The Bible, Exposing The Intentional Deception And Destruction Of The Unwitting Masses During What The Bible Refers To As The Last Days.






Reviews:

"A HIGHLY INTERESTING AND POWERFULLY ILLUMINATING WORK. Sin, the breaking of God's Law on the national level, as well as the personal, has shattering effects which move out into the world like ripples on a pond and form the bonds of our own slavery. Everything from economic laws to the consequences of multiculturalism are discussed on the literal level with a fascinating symbolic examination of the Song of Solomon. AN ABSOLUTELY EYE-OPENING BOOK! McQUATE HAS HIT ONE OUT OF THE PARK. A MUST READ!"
- Scott Michaels
Geophysicist, Theologian, Teacher, Author of How We Should Then Live and The Mid-Night-Morning Trilogy

"THIS IS A MUST READ BOOK for serious Bible researchers who are seeking a deeper understanding of the real events of the Garden in Eden. For many, the Song of Solomon was only an interesting curiosity without any importance or significance outside of its own content. Not only has McQuate shared his new insights on the Song of Solomon but he has also joined the ranks of other pioneers in exposing the apostasy of the false prophet in the Bible in the process."

- Tom Miller
Writer, Researcher, Theologia

"I DON'T HAVE WORDS TO DESCRIBE THIS BOOK, EXCEPT THAT IT IS A MUST READ for any member of the Bride of Yashua that wants to know the truth. McQuate exposes the lies that the majority of the members of Yashua's Bride don't even know about.Thank you for writing such a life changing book and YHWH bless you.
- Wessel H.


IN BLUEPRINT FOR BONDAGE YOU WILL LEARN:

* What actually happened in the Garden in Eden and why it's been covered up!
* What secret society has infiltrated the church (yes, YOUR church) for the Bride's destruction
* The real reasons for the disease of division in the Church and in America
* How God's people and Americans in general have been intentionally deceived for their planned destruction
* The real reasons for Global Warming . . . they're not what you think!
* Why the movie War Of The Worlds is not just fantasy!
* Why aliens are real and who those about to arrive on our world truly are!
* Why the financial climate in America will only get worse - quickly!
* Why you need to prepare for the collapse of America and the world . . . and how!
* That there is a false prophet who has infiltrated the Bible and who he is . . . you will be shocked!
* How this false prophet's destructive doctrines are almost exclusively taught by the church today
* Who God's chosen people are in the Bible and today . . . they're not who you think!
* The never-before-seen hidden message of Solomon, now uncovered by the author!
* How to avoid the devastating and soul-stealing lies preached in today's churches
* How to protect yourself and your family in the coming chaotic days . . .
* And how all of these topics fit together for the endtime plan to destroy God's people and those living with her in Mystery Babylon!






Here is an excerpt from the book:
In the Aramaic Targum, pseudo-Jonathan, which shows us that Genesis 4:1 has obviously been tampered with at some point by these evil infiltrators. It should actually be read as follows; And Adam knew his wife Eve, who was pregnant by Sammael (Satan), and she conceived and bare Cain, and he was like the heavenly beings, and not like the earthly beings, and she said, I have gotten a man from the angel of the Lord. Lest there be any doubt in the readers mind as to the identity of Sammael in this passage, we read in The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, according to Jewish theology…the destroyer or angel of death appears under the name Sammael (i.e. the poison of God), who was once an arch-angel before the throne of God, and who caused the serpent to tempt Eve. According to Weber, he is not to be distinguished from Satan.

These and other aberrations of our nearly worshipped King James translation of the Bible are not surprising however, as there has been a concerted effort to thwart the purposes of YHWH throughout scripture. This situation is no different. The Holy Scriptures of YHWH seem to be vulnerable to these evil men’s tactics, just as are his people.

We can read where YHWH warns us of such an infiltration, when we read in Jude verse 4 For there are certain men crept in unawares (secretly), who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness (literally unbridled lust, as in the garden), and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.

For further support of this idea of Biblical tampering, we read Sir Thomas Moore’s words in reference to Tyndale, in the Journal of English and Germanic Philology, (Tyndale) was guilty of intentionally mistranslating the Bible. And Tyndale’s translations were one thing that eventually led to his death at the stake!

Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh, in their book entitled The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception also support this idea of deception and tampering by saying, There is virtually unanimous agreement among all the concerned parties … that the history of Dead Sea Scroll scholarship does constitute a scandal. And there would seem to be little doubt that something irregular … lurks behind the delays, the procrastinations, the equivocation, the restrictions on material.








Wednesday, December 16, 2009

The Hebrew-Israelite-Canaanite Origins of Druidism & Norse, Teutonic, and Celtic paganism



Amazing insights in this article by Eli James of "Anglo-Saxon Israel".

And to be clear on the title of this post, of course the Old Testament religion of the Israelites was not "pagan." Rather, the pagan Teutonic and Celtic religions are a mixture of Canaanite paganism and Old Testament Hebrewism. How? Because the Celts, Saxons, and other Northern European tribes are the descendants of the Israelites...who were banished from the ancient land of Israel in Palestine because they adopted Canaanite paganism, which they then carried with them when they migrated into Europe.

Myth: European Paganism Is of Non-Hebrew Origin

Many White pagans assume that Teutonic and Celtic paganism are of non-Hebrew origin. This is not true. The fact is that the main reason that Yahweh banished the Israelites into the wilderness was because of their acquired taste for paganism. The Israelites of the Ten Northern Tribes, especially under Jezebel (a Sidonian Canaanite woman) and Ahab, were practicing all sorts of pagan rituals, including human sacrifice and frolicking (sex orgies) in the groves. Ah! The good old days!!! These practices were borrowed from the neighboring Canaanites; and the false gods they worshipped were actually Canaanite gods and goddesses. We will here proceed to document the Canaanite origin of Celtic and Teutonic paganism among the Aryan nations.

Hosea 4:15-17 trells us, “…come not ye unto Gilgal, neither go you up to Bethaven…For Israel slideth back as a backsliding heifer…Ephraim is joined to idols.”

Bethaven means “house of Aven.” The Phoenician Israelites, who travelled back and forth to Britain, mining tin and other metals and bringing them back to Palestine, named numerous places after the place of the god, Aven, such as Avebury, the Avon River(s) and the town of Avening.

“The worship of Beth-Aven, in Canaan, and that of Avening in Gloucestershire, and that of Aven, Heliopolis or Baal Bec, were all identical. The stone altars, the high place, the calves’ bones discovered there, mark the similarity.” - Samuel Lysons, Our British Ancestors, p. 123.

“But ye have borne the tabernacle of your Moloch and Chiun your images, the star of your god, which ye made to yourselves, therefore will I cause you to go into captivity..” - Amos 5:26.

Moloch and Chiun were pagan gods adopted by the rebellious Israelites. Yahweh was getting very angry with His children. He was getting ready to cast them out into the wilderness of Europe.

“The Druids worshipped the sun under the title of Moloch, so we are certain that worship was derived from their Eastern ancestors.” – Dr. Thomas Maurice, Indian Antiquities, 1796.

Who were the Druids? The Druids were Levitical priests who abandoned Yahweh and officiated at the pagan rites of the rebellious Israelites! Their costumes matched the uniforms of the Israelite priests, down to the tiniest detail!

“The Irish Druids worshipped under sacred oaks, as the Israelites did. The Druids had a great veneration for the oak. The last act of Joshua was to place a great stone under an oak in the sanctuary…The Druids were considered to be a holy people, a nation of priests, common to all the tribes of Britain. Their duties, characteristics and dress were strikingly in consonance with those of the Levitical priesthood.” – Hugh B. Colquhoun, Our Descent From Israel Proved by Cumulative Evidence, p, 20.

‘Druid’ is the Celtic word for “oak.” The Druids were the high priests of the oak fraternity.

Chiun was a goddess of the Canaanites, and the Israelites began to worship her as well.

“The children gather wood, and the fathers kindle the fire, and the women knead their dough, to make cakes to the Queen of Heaven and to pour out drink offerings unto other gods…” – Hosea 1:18.

It is quite likely that the name Chiun is the Hebrew source for the surname Quinn and the English word Queen.

The Teutonic god, Odin, or Wotan, is actually the Scythian German King Odin, the warrior chief who organized the Teutons into a fighting force that defeated the Romans. He was a real descendant of the Israelites, not a god. Odin is also a word very similar to a Hebrew word for lord, Adon (Greek Adonis).

According to Sharon Turner in his monumental work The History of the Anglo-Saxons, citing the ancient Saxon Chronicles, the famous Odin actually lived in the 3rd century AD, and many of the kings of England, Germany and Scandinavia traced their descent from him. We have a tendency to make “stars” out of our heroes. The word Teut is an anglicized version of the German Deutsch, which is derived from the Latin (Roman) Deus, meaning “god.” The word Deutschevolk, therefore, means “God’s people.” This is exactly how the Israelites referred to themselves. No other people in history referred to themselves as God’s people, except the Israelites. All of the Celts and Saxons retained some form of this expression. The word British, in Hebrew, means “Covenant Man.” Brit is Hebrew for Covenant and Ish is Hebrew for “man.” The Saxon Goth and the German Gott both mean “God.” Gottish, therefore, means “God’s People.”

The Celtic Bel is identical to the Hebrew Baal; and the Beltrane feast is still celebrated in parts of Britain today. None of these people have any idea that they are practicing traditions brought to Europe by their pagan Israelite ancestors!

The Hebrew word, Al, meaning the sun, became the Phoenician Hal. In Celtic, it becomes Heaul; and in Greek it was Helios.

“All Celtic nations have been accustomed to the worship of the sun…It was a custom that everywhere prevailed in ancient times to celebrate a feast at the winter solstice…They called it, in many places, Yole or Yuul, from the word Hiaul.” - Professor Paul-Henri Mallett, Northern Antiquities, Vol. 2, p 68.

Now you know the origin of the word ‘Yule,” for Christmas, and why Christmas is celebrated right near the solstice, when all evidence suggests that Yahshua was born in late September.

The Catholic Church has been most guilty of blending paganism with Christianity, as Easter is really a hybrid pagan rite, derived from the worship of the Babylonian goddess, Ishtar. Ishtar was the goddess of fertility. Have you ever wondered what the Easter bunny has to do with the Crucifixion? The short answer is: “Nothing!”

Mary-worship can be traced back to Semiramis of Babylon. Statues of Semiramis show her as the prototypical “Madonna and child.” So, Christmas, Easter and the Madonna motif all contain pagan elements directly traceable to ancient Babylon.

Neo-pagans believe that the word, Saxon, derives from the word Axe. How the letter S was added to the word axe is obscure. What we know for sure is that Yahweh told Abraham that his offspring would be named after his son, Isaac. “In Isaac shall they seed be called.” – Gen. 21:12. Note that the Jewish people are NOT named after Isaac. Saxons = Isaac’s sons. Even if the word Saxon is derivable from the word, axe, it is still an Israelite connection, for in Jeremiah 51:20, Yahweh tells His people, Israel, “Thou art my BATTLE-AXE.” The Israelites were famous for their use of the battle-axe in war. Their descendants, the Scythians and Anglo-Saxons, were also famous for the use of this weapon. Yet it is evident, that the Scythian tribes who migrated into Europe were called Khumri by the Assyrians, hence the Greek Kimmeroi; and they were called Saka by the Persians, hence the Greek Sakae or Sakans, later Saxons. These names are well documented in the Greek classics and in the multilingual inscriptions of Mesopotamia.

In addition to telling us that we would be exiled for our pagan rebellion, Yahweh also told us that we would be known by another name. (Isaiah 62:2; 65:15.) “Caucasian” is the best bet, but Anglo-Saxon and Christian would also qualify as new names for His Israelite people. Many other similarities exist in the Germanic and Hebrew belief systems, such as an existence in an afterlife, heaven and hell (Valhalla and Niflheim) etc. {Niflheim bears an uncanny resemblance to the Hebrew word Nephilim, meaning the offspring of the fallen angels and the daughters of Adamite women, in Genesis 6.}

We are only scratching the surface of this subject. The Canaanite origin of the Celtic/Teutonic pantheon can be demonstrated in volumes of historical and linguistic connections. There is so much evidence of this fact that it is quite irrefutable. But, of course, few Whites or Christians are aware of the Israelites’ descent into paganism. It’s a forgotten chapter of the Bible. Neo-Pagans of today have no idea that they are actually worshipping the gods of the Canaanites, who were the true ancestors of today’s Jews.

So, who’s REALLY practicing a form of Judaism – Christian Identity or Neo-Pagans?

How’s them apples? – Or should we say, Acorns?


On the migrations of the tribes of Israel into Europe, and the similarities of Norse mythology to the Old Testament and Babylonian religion

The Hebrew-Israelite Origins of Europe: Sea-faring Israelites fleeing the Assyrians in 8th century B.C. fled to Greece, Europe, and British Isles

English and other Germanic Languages, as well as Greek, Latin and Runic, Have Their Origin in Hebrew

The Mystery of the True Descendants of the Israelites - The White Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, and Kindred Peoples

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

'Jesus may have visited England', says Scottish academic

Thursday, 26 November 2009
BBC News

Could Jesus Christ have visited Glastonbury?

Jesus Christ could have come to Britain to further his education, according to a Scottish academic.

Church of Scotland minister Dr Gordon Strachan makes the claim in a new film entitled And Did Those Feet.

The film examines the story of Jesus' supposed visit, which survives in the popular hymn Jerusalem.

Dr Strachan believes it is "plausible" Jesus came to England for his studies, as it was the forefront of learning 2,000 years ago.

"Coming this far wasn't in fact that far in the olden days," Dr Strachan told BBC Radio 4's The World At One. "The Romans came here at the same time and they found it quite easy."

Dr Strachan added that Jesus had "plenty of time" to do the journey, as little was known about his life before the age of 30.

The legend that Jesus Christ came to Britain was popularised in a poem written by William Blake in the early 19th Century and made famous as a hymn 100 years later
.

William Blake's "Jerusalem" spread the idea Jesus came to England

Now the first words of the hymn - "And did those feet" - are the title of a new film based on a book researched by Dr Strachan, who lectures on the history of architecture at Edinburgh University.

"It is generally suggested that he came to the west of England with his uncle, Joseph of Arimathea, who was here for tin," said the academic.

Dr Strachan claimed Jesus Christ could have come to England to further his education.

"He needed to go around to learn bits and pieces about ancient wisdom, and the druids in Britain went back hundreds if not thousands of years. He probably came here to meet the druids, to share his wisdom and gain theirs."

Among the places Jesus is said to have visited are Penzance, Falmouth, St-Just-in-Roseland and Looe, which are all in Cornwall, as well as Glastonbury in Somerset - which has particular legends about Jesus.

"St Augustine wrote to the Pope to say he'd discovered a church in Glastonbury built by followers of Jesus. But St Gildas (a 6th-Century British cleric) said it was built by Jesus himself. It's a very very ancient church which went back perhaps to AD37."

The film And Did Those Feet is being screened on Friday in central London.



Related Reading:

The first Christian Church A.D. 37: at Glastonbury, Britain: Founded by Joseph of Arimathaea, Christ's great-uncle

Unraveling The Mysteries of Glastonbury

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

Message from James Wickstrom – Jews, Obama, Racial Identity, Communism

(Either JavaScript is not active or you are using an old version of Adobe Flash Player. Please install the newest Flash Player.)

source: prothink.org

"One of the most informative videos I have seen in a while and I have seen a ton of videos" - Prothink

Thursday, July 16, 2009

Historical Documentation on the Appearance of Yahshua ("Jesus")



Letter from Pontius Pilate To Tiberius Caesar

This a reprint of a letter from Pontius Pilate to Tiberius Caesar describing the Physical appearance of Jesus. Copies are in the Congressional Library in Washington:

To Tiberius Caesar

A young man appeared in Galilee preaching with humble unction, a new law in the Name of the God that had sent Him. At first I was apprehensive that His design was to stir up the people against the Romans, but my fears were soon dispelled. Jesus of Nazareth spoke rather as a friend of the Romans than of the Jews. One day I observed in the midst of a group of people a young man who was leaning against a tree, calmly addressing the multitude. I was told it was Jesus. This I could easily have suspected so great was the difference between Him and those who were listening to Him. His golden colored hair and beard gave to his appearance a celestial aspect. He appeared to be about 30 years of age. Never have I seen a sweeter or more serene countenance. What a contrast between Him and His bearers with their black beards and tawny complexions! Unwilling to interrupt Him by my presence, I continued my walk but signified to my secretary to join the group and listen. Later, my secretary reported that never had he seen in the works of all the philosophers anything that compared to the teachings of Jesus. He told me that Jesus was neither seditious nor rebellious, so we extended to Him our protection. He was at liberty to act, to speak, to assemble and to address the people. This unlimited freedom provoked the Jews-not the poor but the rich and powerful.

Later, I wrote to Jesus requesting an interview with Him at the Praetorium. He came. When the Nazarene made His appearance I was having my morning walk and as I faced Him my feet seemed fastened with an iron hand to the marble pavement and I trembled in every limb as a guilty culprit, though He was calm. For some time I stood admiring this extraordinary man. There was nothing in Him that was repelling, nor in His character, yet I felt awed in His presence. I told Him that there was a magnetic simplicity about Him and His personality that elevated Him far above the philosophers and teachers of His day. All in all, He made a deep impression upon me and everyone because of His kindness, simplicity, humility and love.

Now, Noble Sovereign, there are the facts concerning Jesus of Nazareth and I have taken the time to write you in detail concerning these matters. I say that such a man who could convert water to wine, change death into life, disease into health; calm the stormy seas, is not guilty of any criminal offense and as others have said, we must agree - truly this is the Son of God!

Your Most obedient servant,

PONTIUS PILATE




The Archko Volume

An additional physical description of Jesus can be found in "The Archko Volume" which contains official first century court documents. This information substantiates that He descended from ethnic lines having blue eyes and golden hair. A part of "Gamaliel's Interview" describes Jesus' appearance.

"I asked him to describe this person to me, so that I might know him if I should meet him. He said: 'If you ever meet him you will know him. While he is nothing but a man, there is something about him that distinguishes him from every other man. He is the picture of his mother, only he has not her smooth, round face. His hair is a little more golden than hers, though it is as much from sunburn as anything else. He is tall, and his shoulders are a little drooped; his visage is thin and of a swarthy complexion, though this is from exposure. His eyes are large and a soft blue, and rather dull and heavy....' This Jew is convinced that he is the Messiah of the world. This was the same person that was born of the virgin in Bethlehem some twenty-six years before."


The Archko Volume was translated by Drs. McIntosh and Twyman of the Antiquarian Lodge, Genoa, Italy, from manuscripts in Constantinople and the records of the Senatorial Docket taken from the Vatican of Rome (1896) 92-93. The letter written on a papyrus scroll dated to about 5 B.C., with an accuracy of +- 50 years.


A Description of Jesus Christ by Publius Lentrelus

The following was taken from a manuscript in the possession of Lord Kelly, and in his library, and was copied from an original letter of Publius Lentullus at Rome. It being the usual custom of Roman Governors to advertise the Senate and people of such material things as happened in their provinces in the days of Tiberius Caesar, Publius Lentullus, President of Judea, wrote the following epistle to the Senate concerning the Nazarene called Jesus. :

"There lives at this time in Judea a man of singular virtue whose name is Jesus Christ, whom the barbarians esteem as a prophet, but his followers love and adore him as the offspring of the immortal God.

He calls back the dead from the graves and heals all sorts of diseases with a word, or touch. He is a tall man, well-shaped, and of an amiable and reverend aspect; his hair of a color that can hardly be matched, falling into graceful curls, waving about and very agreeable crouching upon his shoulder, parted on the crown of the head, running as a stream to the front after the fashion of the nazarites. His forehead high, large and imposing; his cheeks without spot or wrinkle, beautiful with a lovely red; his nose and mouth formed with exquisite symmetry; his beard, and of a color suitable to his hair, reaching below his chin and parted in the middle like a fork; his eyes bright blue, clear and serene. Look innocent, dignified, manly and mature. In proportion of body and most perfect, and captivating; his arms and hands delectable to behold.

He rebukes with majesty, councils with mildness, His whole address whether in word or deed, being eloquent and grave. No man has seen him laugh, yet his manners are exceedingly pleasant, but he has wept frequently in the presence of men. He is temperate, modest and wise. A man for his extraordinary beauty and perfection, surpassing the children of men in every sense."


source

Thursday, April 2, 2009

The Hebrew-Israelite Origins of Europe: Sea-faring Israelites fleeing the Assyrians in 8th century B.C. fled to Greece, Europe, and British Isles


Modern secular historians acknowledge that a people known as the Phoenicians established many of the earliest settlements in Europe. Although debated among those in Christian Identity, there is a growing camp that holds the Phoenicians were actually a Hebrew-Israelite people.

The Israelites not only migrated to Europe by land after release from captivity in Assyria over the Caucasus Mountains and around the Black Sea. Certain tribes of the Israelites (notably the tribe of Dan) and the Phoenicians were highly skilled seafarers, who travelled, traded and settled all in the Mediterranean, Spain, and all the way to the British Isles, where they obtained tin from mines in southwestern England.

Many early European civilizations, including the Greek civilization, were founded by these Hebrew-Phoenician-Israelite peoples long before the Assyrian captivity of the northern ten tribes in the 8th century B.C. Then, around the time of the Assyrian conquer of the ten northern tribes, a great many Israelites fled the advancing Assyrians, moving west into Europe.

I have posted two articles below on the subject. I would also highly recommend listening to the 03/15/2009 podcast of Pastor Eli James' radio broadcast dealing with this subject, with special emphasis on the Israelite-Hebrew origins of the Phoenicians.

Ancient Hebrew Sea Migrations

THE FULFILLMENT OF BIBLE PROPHECY IN ANCIENT ISRAEL’S EUROPEAN COLONIES

Modern science and archaeology in recent years have made tremendous progress in uncovering facts about our forgotten past. Not only has much of the Sacred Story been confirmed as fact, but many misconceptions about it have been proven untrue. A common misconception of yesteryear was the idea that although the Phoenicians traded and established colonies throughout the Mediterranean area, their Israelite neighbors never set foot on a boat or visited distant lands in ancient times. This idea persisted in spite of the fact that the word, ‘Hebrew’ itself is known to have signified "a colonist." Modern research has in fact now documented that ancient Semitic colonization in Europe, including Hebrew, was "enduring and significant," according to Dr. Cyrus H. Gordon, whose extensive research was highlighted throughout an entire issue of Biblical Archaeologist magazine (March, 1996). Having written over 20 books and learned over a dozen languages, Dr. Gordon is widely considered the leading American archaeologist and antiquarian of the twentieth century. His research has established that "no longer can we... consider Israel the vacuum-packed miracle from Sinai. Rather must we view Greek and Hebrew civilizations as parallel structures built upon the same East Mediterranean foundation" ' Homer & Bible,' page 72)

COLONIZATION BY THE BIBLICAL TRIBE OF DAN

Scholars have written for centuries about an ancient sea-faring people known to modern history books as the Tuatha de Danan, who founded civilizations in Greece, Spain, Britain, and Ireland. Scholars now know that the word, Tuath, means tribe. Dr. Gordon has also established that the suffix, AN was added to proper names in early times to signify a people or community. Thus, the name of these important early European colonists should be translated, the tribe of Dan. Was this the Biblical people, one of the twelve tribes of Israel? Indeed it was, according to Dr. Gordon, who relates, "A group of Sea People bore the name of Dan. The Bible tells how a segment of the seafaring (Judges 5:17) Danites [were part of] the tribal system of ancient Israel... The Danites were widespread. Cyprus was called Ia-Dnan ‘The Island of Dan(an).’ The same people were called Danuna, and under this name they appear as rulers of the Plain of Adana in Cilicia. Greek tradition has their eponymous ancestor, Danaos (Dan), migrating from the Nile delta to Greece... [Note that the Israelites did in fact emigrate from Egypt.] So important was this movement that the Greeks afterward called themselves Danaoi for centuries. Virgil also designated the Greeks as Danai. Bold scholars see the influence of the Danites in Irish folk lore... and in the name of Danmark (Denmark): the land of Dan... it is a mistake to accept the consensus and to imagine that Sea People with enough striking power... to change the course of history were unenterprising to the point of never sailing west of Gibraltar. (p. 108, 111, Before Columbus)

Dr. Gordon also points out Biblical evidence that "three of the [Israel] tribes are described as navigational: Zebulon, Dan and Asher (Genesis 49:13; Judges 5:17)," ibid., page 112. Based on the eminent Dr. Gordon’s research, we see that the ancient Hebrews not only sailed throughout the Mediterranean and Atlantic European coasts, but settled there and founded European civilization. Similarly, in the appendix to noted antiquarian G. Robert Gair’s "Geographical Environment and Race Movements," (1932) is the statement, "Migration...was responsible for the emigration of a great mass of Dan, Asher, Zebulon and Naphthali, who thus evaded the captivity under Assyria [762-676 B.C.], and turned nomad." Logically, Israelites evaded the Assyrian power to the east, by migrating westward. How do we verify where these Israel tribes went in ancient times? One way is by language study.

Early antiquarian scholar, Aylett Sammes, published his extensive research in 1676 in a work entitled, " The Antiquities Of Ancient Britain Derived From The Phoenicians." He pointed out (p. 58) that the Danites were also known in British history as "Damnonii," but that "the transposition is very easy and usual, and hides not at all the original, Dan." The Danites settled especially in southwestern Britain’s "Phoenician" tin districts, he says, adding that in this area many rivers, cities, and hills have names compounded with the tribal name, "Dan."

HEBREW-PHOENICIAN WORD ORIGINS

Many words and customs in early Britain show their Hebrew-Phoenician origin. Aylett Sammes gives (p. 64), for instance, the Phoenician word, "Rheda," meaning a chariot, as the source of the Celtic words, "Rhediad," a course, "Rheder," to run, and "Redeesa," a race. "Essedum" was a Gaulish and British word for a wagon, and corresponded with the Semitic "Dassedan, signifying the same thing." "Pen" was the Celtic word for a high and steep hill, which came from the Phoenician, "Pinna." The Celtic, "Bro," or "Boro," meaning a region or country, corresponded with the Phoenician "Baro." Numerous other examples are given by Sammes to show that the Phoenician influence in the settlement of Europe was very significant. Modern scholar Cyrus Gordon further relates that historians often use the word, Phoenician, in its "wider sense" of Semitic peoples in general, including the Hebrews. The wide extent of their influence is shown on the map we’ve reproduced from a standard history textbook. Although labeled "Phoenician" or "Syrian," we believe the evidence indicates that ancient Israel deserves credit for much of that which has been attributed to her neighbors. A more complete discussion of the Celtic link with Israel is included in our tract, "The Hebrew-Celtic Connection."

Chapter three of Aylett Sammes’ study provides evidence that much of the coastland of Europe and the Mediterranean was settled by Hebrew-Phoenician speaking people. Here are a few of the place-names given by Sammes with their Hebrew-Phoenician root meanings:

Europe, Greek "Europa", received its name from the Phoenician, Ur-appa, signifying "a country of white complexions."

ASIA, or"Asi" in the Phoenician language signifieth the country between or in the middle." Evidently, Asia Minor (modern Turkey) was considered the land between Europe and the Mid-East.

[...]

HEBREW OR PHOENICIAN?

Although Professor Sammes gave these and many other examples of European place names indicating a Phoenician origin, it is important to note that the Hebrews and Phoenicians spoke the same language, with only minor differences. The Phoenicians, in fact, were Semitic distant relatives of the Hebrews, tracing their origin back to ancient Chaldea, the home of the patriarch Abraham. Nevertheless, we have good reason for suspecting that much of the so-called "Phoenician" trade and colonization was in reality Israelite.

Early 19th century noted antiquarian scholar, Sir William Betham, studied the Celtic origins of Europe, and his studies of early Italy were published in a two-volume work, "Etruria Celtica." Betham reproduced ancient coins from the kingdom of Utruria, in Italy, known as the Etruscan civilization. Interestingly, several of the Utrurian coins discovered were minted in honor of their deity, which was none other than Yahweh, God of the Hebrews! We have reproduced examples of these coins from the book, and Betham comments as follows:

"A human head in profile, proceeding from a shell, under it, the word, HAT, in the later Etruscan character... The word [also] appears written TAH... it is written both from right to left, and vice versa. The word, TA in the Celtic, is the auxiliary verb am, is, also existence, being, i.e. the self-existent being, God. O’Reilly renders it Jehovah [or Yahweh]... I find in the MS. Dictionary of the late William Haliday, and that of James MacGauran, the same meaning is given.” (vol. ii, page 135) Betham continues, "No. 2 is a human foot, cut off at the ankle, under it the word TAH, emblematic of the subjection of all things to the Supreme being." (ibid, vol. ii, pages 135-136)

"The word... TAH, which appears on some of the Etruscan coins... is the first person present of the auxiliary verb TA, ‘I am.’ It is remarkable that this name God gave to himself from the burning bush, I AM THAT I AM; and again -- ‘Thus shall thou say unto the children of Israel I AM has sent me unto you.’ -- ‘This is my name forever.’ (Exodus 3:14-15) " (ibid., vol. ii, page 33)

Therefore, as Sir William Betham points out, these coins represent worship of Yahweh, the Biblical "I AM," the God of Israel; as such, the early colonists who founded the Etruscan civilization in Italy could only have been Israelites! These were not Phoenicians, the worshippers of "Baal." Note particularly the virtual identity of the ancient Hebrew, British Celtic, and early Etruscan worship of the True God. It is no accident that the Celtic "TA," Etruscan "TAH," and the similar Hebrew, "YAH," all have identical meanings: the "Self-Existent," or "Ever-Living," and the "I AM," showing their obvious connection. Our study, "The Old Testament Roots Of Early European Mythology," shows the amazing similarity of their religious beliefs and customs.

HEBREW CONNECTIONS WITH EUROPE

Much evidence exists of ancient Israel in Europe. Our tract, "Ancient Israel In Spain And Britain," presents information about Hebrew colonization of Spain in the time of Solomon, whose "ships of Tarshish" (or Tartessus, another ancient name for Spain) are mentioned in the Bible. These traditions must have been strong, for the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia (vol. I, p. 316) informs us, “John Sadler, a student of Oriental Literature, published in 1649 his Rights of the Kingdom, in which he endeavored to show...that the English are the descendants of Israelites. He explained the name “Britain” as being derived from the Phoenician Berat Anac...He was evidently influenced by the tradition that in the time of Solomon, Phoenician traders, accompanied by Hebrews, reached as far as England and bartered their wares for the tin obtained from the mines of Cornwall. England was therefore known to the Israelites and they may have sought a refuge there after the fall of their kingdom [by the Assyrians, 762-676 B.C.]” Were a significant number of these early European colonists Hebrews? In ancient times, Israel was a nation several times larger and more populous than Phoenicia, as can be easily seen on Bible maps. It would seem obvious that the few small Phoenician city-states could never by themselves have settled all of the coastlands of Europe.

[...]

PROPHECY FULFILLED IN ISRAEL’S EUROPEAN COLONIES

Here are a few key promises of Scripture which were given by God to Israel, not to the Phoenicians. Whose descendants fulfilled them?

Israel was to become "a multitude of nations," Genesis 48:19; "a company of nations," Genesis 35:11 Where are these nations today, comprised of Israel’s descendants, as foreordained in the unconditional Abrahamic covenant?

Israel was to move to a new home-land outside of Palestine. This prophecy, given in about 1042 B.C., states, "Moreover, I will appoint a place for my people Israel and will plant them, that they may dwell in a place of their own, and move no more; neither shall the children of wickedness afflict them any more, as beforetime." (II Sam. 7:10)

History and Scripture clearly indicate a migration of Israelites north and west from Palestine. Isaiah 11:14 declares, "they shall fly upon the shoulders of the Philistines toward the west..." Israel was warned to flee the Mesopotamian power, Babylon, an obvious hint that many of them moved in the opposite direction -- toward Europe! (Zech. 2:6-7)

Israel was to become a tremendous number of descendants, "as the sand on the sea shore." (Gen. 32:12; Jer. 33:22; Hos. 1:10), and "as the stars of heaven for multitude," (Gen. 26:4; Exo. 32:13). Later Scripture affirms that was indeed taking place: "God hath enlarged you as the sand on the sea shore.." (Deut. 1:10) The Bible indicates a population of six million Israelites in ancient times before the Assyrian captivity. (See tract, "The Real Diaspora") The House Of Israel disappeared from Palestine as ‘lost tribes’ and populated much of early Europe.

Europe was left virtually empty in ancient times, prepared for the great number of Israelites to be sent there in God’s Providence. "When the Most High divided to the nations their inheritance; when He separated the Sons of Adam, He set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel." (Deut. 32:8)

Israel was to expand in the seas: "Thy way is in the sea, and thy path in the great waters, and thy footsteps are not known." (Psalm 77:19) "I will set his hand also in the sea, and his right hand in the rivers." (Psalm 89:25) "Ask of me, and I will give thee of the heathen for thy inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession." (Psa. 2:8) "He shall have dominion from sea to sea..." (Psalm 72:8) "His seed shall be in many waters" (Num. 24:7) How wonderfully have these promises of sea migration and colonization been fulfilled!

Abraham’s descendants were to "spread abroad" to the ends of the earth. (Gen. 2814) Israel had already settled colonies in the isles of the west when Jeremiah wrote this in circa 600 B.C.: "Hear the word of the Lord, O ye nations and declare it in the isles afar off, and say, He that scattered Israel will gather him and keep him, as a shepherd does his flock." (Jer. 31:10) True to prophecy, Israel was gathered to the great shepherd, Jesus Christ, through faith, and the Israel nations became known as Christendom, or ‘Christ’s Kingdom on earth.’ "Sing...His praise from the end of the earth..." (Isaiah 42:10) And they do!


The only thing I saw in the following article I would disagree with is the identification of the Phoenicians as Canaanites.

THE HEBREW - CELTIC CONNECTION

IN the eighth century, B.C., the Assyrian Empire was at its peak, and its armies threatened the nations on the eastern Mediterranean seaboard, including Israel. The Assyrians were a brutal, fearsome people, the most terrible, perhaps, in all the earth's history. Conquered lands were literally plundered of everything of value - even people, who were taken to slavery in foreign lands. The wall murals of the Assyrians, some of which now bedeck the British Museum in London, depict scenes of horrible savagery and torture. Men were sometimes skinned alive, or impaled on poles to slowly die outside the gates of a city.

Famed archaeologist Sir Austen Henry Layard, rediscovered and unearthed the ancient Assyrian cities, and graphically described the scenes on the wall murals he found: 'Captives ... were stretched naked at full length on the ground, and whilst their limbs were held apart by pegs and cords they were being flayed alive. Beneath them were other unfortunate victims under-going abominable punishments. The brains of one were apparently being beaten out with an iron mace, whilst an officer held him by the beard. A torturer was wrenching the tongue out of the mouth of a second wretch who had been pinioned to the ground. The bleeding heads of the slain were tied round the necks of the living who seemed reserved for still more barbarous tortures.'(Discoveries In The Ruins of Assyria And Babylon p. 456)

Inhabitants of Palestine in those days were well aware that Assyria would only too soon conduct a similar brutal warfare against the eastern shore of the Mediterranean. Would not large numbers of Israelites migrate westward, by land and sea, to find safety for themselves and their families outside of the Assyrian sphere of influence?

Historical evidence indicates that did indeed happen. The authoritative Dictionary of Christ & The Gospels relates, 'LARGE NUMBERS OF ISRAELITES HAD BEEN CARRIED AWAY CAPTIVE BY THE ASSYRIANS AND BABYLONIANS ... BUT A MUCH LARGER DISPERSION WAS DUE TO VOLUNTARY EMIGRATION.'(Vol. 1, p.692) Yes, more Israelites emigrated, migrated voluntarily out of Palestine, than even the large numbers of those taken away in the Assyrian and Babylonian captivities. As it became clear that invasion and conquest by Assyria was imminent, Hebrews and Phoenicians emigrated westward to distant lands by the many hundreds of thousands, forming the foundation of European civilization.


These historical facts have been known for centuries, and a plethora of books by leading historians has documented 'the Phoenician origin' of Western civilization. Historians have given the Phoenicians most of the credit for this emigration from Palestine to Europe, although the Hebrews were more numerous, and were Divinely promised greatly increased numbers. Perhaps the answer to the confusion is that the Hebrew language is a Phoenician dialect, and the two are virtually identical. But as we will see, a great multitude of the 'Phoenician' speaking early European colonists can be shown to be Hebrew. Famed historian, George Rawlinson, added that, 'The Tyrians [Phoenicians] conceded to the Israelites a participation in the traffic which they had carried on for so long a time with the nations of the west. Two trading fleets were formed (I Kings 9:27; 10:22), to which each of the two nations contributed both ships and men.' (Phoenicia pp. 101 - 102) From such trading colonies grew and developed early European cities.

LANGUAGE LINK

In the 18th century, historians discovered exciting proof of Phoenician-Celtic ties. An ancient Roman dramatist, Titus Maccius Plautus (died 184 B.C.) wrote a play, the Penulus in which he placed then current Phoenician into the speech of one of his characters. In the 18th century, linguists noticed the great similarity between that Phoenician and the early Irish Celtic language. In the adjacent box is a sample given by historian Thomas Moore's, History of Ireland, showing the connection between these languages. Leading 18th and 19th century scholars, such as Gen. Charles Vallancey, Lord Rosse, and Sir William Betham, also wrote on this subject. Vallancey, for instance, speaks of, 'The great affinity found in many words, nay whole lines and sentences of this speech, between the Punic [Phoenician] and the Irish.' Famed historian, George Rawlinson, added that this and other inscriptions are 'READILY EXPLICABLE, IF HEBREW BE ASSUMED AS THE KEY TO THEM, BUT NOT OTHERWISE.'(Phoenicia, p. 327)

THE SIMILARITY BETWEEN THE EARLY IRISH-CELTIC AND THE SECOND CENTURY, B.C., HEBREW- PHOENICIAN LANGUAGE, AS SHOWN BY THE PENULUS OF PLAUTUS:

PHOENICIAN OF PLAUTUS:

Byth lym mo thym nociothii nel ech an ti daisc machon

Ys i do iebrim thyfe lyth chy lya chon temlyph ula.

EARLY IRISH-CELTIC:

Beth liom' mo thime nociaithe, niel ach an ti dairie mae coinne

Is i de leabhraim tafach leith, chi lis con teampluibh ulla.

In 1772, General Charles Vallancey, a leading Irish scholar of the day, published his famous work, Essay On The Antiquity Of The Irish Language, Being A Collation Of The Irish With The Punic (Hebrew) Language.-In his opening remarks he states, 'On a collation of the Irish with the Celtic, Punic, Phoenician and Hebrew languages, the strongest affinity, (nay a perfect Identity in very many Words) will appear, it may therefore be deemed a Punic-Celtic compound.' Vallancey continues, 'from the Hebrew proceeded the Phoenician, from the Phoenician, Carthaginian, or Punic was derived the Aeolian, Dorian and Etruscan and from these was formed the Latin ... Of the Roman Saxon capital letters, the Irish use but three, all the others bear a very great resemblance to the primitive Hebrew and Phoenician.' (p. 2-3) Modern language scholars have confirmed that there is a definite connection between the Celtic and Hebrew, as we have shown in our tract, Hebrew And English.

RELIGIOUS LINK

Since it is true that Hebrews and Phoenicians migrated to Europe in large numbers in ancient times, there must be religious and cultural ties, and in fact, such connections abound. Dr Thornas Moore's, History of Ireland (p. 40), relates:

'That most common of all Celtic monuments, the Cromlech is to be found not only in most parts of Europe, but also in Asia,' including Palestine. 'Not less ancient and general among the Celtic nations, was the circle of upright stones, with either an altar or tall pillar in the centre, and, like its prototype at Gilgal [ancient Israel], serving sometimes as a temple of worship, sometimes as a place of national council or inauguration ... The rough, unhewn stone... used in their circular temples by the Druids, was the true, orthodox observance of the divine command delivered to Noah, 'If thou wilt make me an altar of stone, thou shalt not build it of hewn stone'(Ex. 20:25) Dr Beauford, in Druidism Revived says, 'It is remarkable that all the ancient altars found in Ireland, and now distinguished by the name of Cromlechs or sloping stones, were originally called Bothal, or the House of God, and they seem to be of the same species as those mentioned in the Book of Genesis, called by the Hebrews, Bethel, which has the same signification as the Irish Bothal' The Bible (Judg. 9:6; 2 Ki. 1 1: 1 4; 2 Chr. 23:13) indicates that Hebrew kings were crowned either standing upon or next to a pillar of stone. 'The practice of seating the new king upon a stone, at his initiation, was the practice in many of the countries of Europe ... The monarchs of Sweden sat upon a stone placed in the centre of twelve lesser ones, and in a similar kind of circle the Kings of Denmark were crowned.'(Moore, ibid., p. 42) Note also the significant Bible number, 'twelve' which was common to both European Celts and the Hebrews.

The book, Identity of the Religious Druidical and Hebrew, adds, 'Circular temples ... abound in England and other parts of Europe. The most ancient account of them is to be found in the book of Exodus (24.4), "And Moses ... builded an altar under the hill and twelve pillars according to the twelve tribes." (p. 15)'. In Europe, Stonehenge, Avebury, and many other early Celtic sites were designed in a circular pattern.

Groves were also features of both Hebrew and Celtic worship. The Bible tells us that Abraham 'called on the everlasting God' (Gen. 13:4) from a grove planted by his own hand. Gideon worshipped God under an oak tree. (Judg. 6:19-24)

The division of time into a seven-day week was practiced by the Irish Celts, identical to the Hebrews. Dr Thomas Moore comments that no other nation kept such a hebdomadal (seven day) cycle 'excepting only among the family of Abraham,' (ibid., p. 54) a remarkable proof of identity between the two peoples!

Since early times, the Israelites sinned against God by adopting many of the pagan practices of their neighbours, and so we find evidence of both Hebrew and Canaanite culture among their descendants in Europe...

There are many other examples, however, of customs linking the Celtic Druids specifically with Israel. English historian, Williain Borlase, in his Antiquities Of Cornwall (1754) presented many pages of such evidence: Druids worshipped but one God and allowed no graven images, identical to the Hebrews, and in contradistinction with almost all other ancient religions.

Consecration was by sprinkling with blood, as in the Old Testament Hebrew worship. Druid priests were clothed in white, similar to the Hebrew priest's white ephod; sacrificial victims were bled to death, and the blood was collected in basins which served to sprinkle the altars; bulls were sacrificed, and the image of a bull (the heraldic sign of the Hebrew tribe of Ephraim) was carried into war.'While they performed their horrid rites of human sacrifice, the drums and trumpets sounded without intermission, that the cries of the miserable victims might not be heard.' (Compare Jer. 7:31-32, the Hebrew/Phoenician place of human sacrifice was called Tophet, meaning 'the drum'). They prayed with uplifted, hands, examined entrails for necromancy, and held the oak in veneration. The Druids used the magic wand in imitation of Moses' rod, poured libations, sacrificed upon the tops of rocks, investigated truth by lots, anointed rock pillars with oil, and marked out boundaries with stones. (pp. 104-132, 161) In these and so many other distinctive ways, the religious customs of the Celts and Hebrews bear an unmistakable resemblance!

GEOGRAPHICAL LINK

The early name of southwestern England was 'Dumnoni', or 'Danmoni', as shown by a portion of a map in Celtic scholar, Sir John Rhys' book, Early Celtic Britain. This comprises today the British counties of Cornwall and Devon. Highly respected historian William Camden remarked concerning Cornwall: 'That region which according to the geographers, is the first of all Britain, and... was in ancient times inhabited by those Britains, whom Solinas called, Dunmonii, Ptolomy (called) Damnonii, or (as we find in some other copies),



MORE TRULY DANMONIL WHICH NAME ... DERIVED FROM THE EVER-CONTINUING MINES OF TIN IN THIS TRACT, WHICH THE BRITANS CALL MOINA.'(Britannia p. 183) This compound word is therefore composed of 'moina', a tin mine, and 'Dan', the people who mined the tin. So this most ancient region of England is properly called 'DANMONI', meaning, 'DAN'S TIN-MINES'. That these early inhabitants known as 'Dan' were in fact the Biblical tribe of the same name has been established by leading modern scholars such as Cyrus Gordon, as shown in our tract, Ancient Hebrew Sea Migrations. If these early colonists had actually been Phoenicians, the region would have been called, not Danmoni, but 'Fenimoni,' because the Phoenicians were known as the'Punic'or 'Feni' civilization.

Celtic scholar, Sir John Rhys, gives strong evidences of Hebrew colonization of the British isles in ancient times. 'lreland was known as IBERION,' he says. (p. 201) The ancient name of the Israelites was Ibri or Iberi (modern Hebrew), which is derived from the name, 'EBER', or 'HEBER', an ancestor and patriarch of that people. Sir John continues, '...in Ireland it was Ivernii in Ptolomy's time; and he mentions a town there called Ivernis, and a river Ivernios. To these may be added various forms of the name of the island such as Juvenal's luuerna, distorted more usually by the Romans into Hibernia. THEIR EPONYMOUS ANCESTOR ... is variously called EBER, Emer, and HEBER.' (ibid., p. 262-3)

Sir John discusses a region 'just in the vicinity of St David's or Mnyw, called in the Welsh Chronicle MONI IUDEORUM, which contains an allusion probably to the same people.' (ibid., p. 226) Sir John says that some scholars suggest this word, Iudeorurn or Judeorurn, may relate to the 'Jutes', a Germanic tribe in Northern Europe, but that he believes such a view incorrect. Instead, Sir John indicates that it identifies Hebrews of the tribe of Judah. Sir John adds, '... lastly we seem to have a trace of the same form in the Welsh Chronicle, sometimes called Annales Cambriae, when it calls Menevia or St. David's Moni Iudeorum. WE NEED NOT BE HERE TROUBLED BY THE LOST TEN TRIBES OF ISRAEL BUT ... IT WOULD BE HARD TO PROVE THE CONTRARY' (ibid. p.150)

Sir John also discusses early Celtic names and suggests that we '... compare Semitic names ... compare the Hebrew.' (ibid., p. 259-260)

HISTORICAL LINK

One last fascinating connection with ancient Israel is suggested by Sir John, who says, 'the (Celtic) Kymry were for some time indifferently called Cambria or Cumbria, the Welsh word on which they are based being, as now written, Cymru ... and is there pronounced nearly as an Englishman would treat it if spelled Kumry or KUMRI.' (p. 142) As students of Old Testament history well know, 'Kumri' or'Khumri' was the name of the Israelites in Assyrian texts. (see, 'The March of Archaeology, by C.W Ceram, p. 216) The virtual identity in spelling and sound between the Israelite 'Khumri', and the Celtic 'Kymry', is too much of a coincidence to not have a relationship. Taken with the rnany other evidences, religious and cultural, the connection between the ancient Hebrews and Celts is too strong to be ignored.

In fact, it is no longer a question of, 'Did Hebrews settle in Europe in ancient times?' but only a question of, 'How many of the people of Europe are of Hebrew descent?' When considering the great numbers of early Israelites (see our tract, The Real Diaspora), and the Biblical promise of multitudinous seed (Gen. 26:4, 32:12; Ex. 32:13; Jer. 33:22, etc.), it is evident that the Hebrew-Celtic connection is very significant.

Irish history records three main waves of colonization to that isle in ancient times: the Firbolgs, of whom little is known, the Tuatha de Danaan (meaning 'Tribe of Dan', tuath means 'tribe'), and the Milesians. The latter two peoples are known to have originated in Asia and may have been related. The Story of Ireland by A.M. Sullivan, tells us this: 'The Milesian colony ... were an Eastern people... they had passed from land to land, from the shores of Asia across the wide expanse of southern Europe, bearing aloft through all their wanderings the Sacred Banner which symbolized to them at once their origin and their mission, the blessing and the promise given to their race. This celebrated standard, the "Sacred Banner of the Milesians," was a flag on which was represented a dead serpent and the rod of Moses...' (p. 12) The Milesians traced their ancestry to 'Gadelius', whose grandfather was 'the king of Scythia' (p.13) Interestingly, Gad was a son of the patriarch Jacob, and his descendants formed one of the tribes of Israel. The Greek word Scythia is derived from the Semitic, Skutha, and the Persian, Saca, which are terms for the Israelites. (see our tract, The Real Diaspora) As if this wasn't enough coincidence, the serpent symbol was a family heraldic emblem of the Israelite tribe of Dan (Gen. 49:17), whose descendants have been traced by leading modern American archaeologist Cyrus Gordon, to the Tuatha de Danaan of early Ireland! (see Before Columbus, pp. 108-111)

SUMMARY

Therefore we can say that in all of these (and a multitude of other) ways, the Celts and Hebrews bear a remarkable relationship. Since the Celts were spread over most of Europe, the cultural, historical, and theological implications of this truth are immensely significant.



Related Articles:
- English and other Germanic Languages, as well as Greek, Latin and Runic, Have Their Origin in Hebrew
- North America extensively explored and settled by ancient Israelites, Phoenicians, Celts, Libyans, & Carthagians as early as 1000 B.C.
- Ancient city discovered deep in Amazonian rainforest linked to the legendary blonde-haired "white warrior cloud people" of Peru
- Link between the Vikings and the early cultures of the Yucatan and Central America? - Legends of White "gods" who sailed to central America
- All Articles on Israelite Identity Christianity
- More Hidden History

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

English and other Germanic Languages, as well as Greek, Latin and Runic, Have Their Origin in Hebrew



Was ENGLISH Derived From HEBREW?

Was English derived from Hebrew? The idiomatic likenesses between ENGLISH and HEBREW were noticed by Tyndale when he translated the scriptures. He said, "The properties of the HEBREW tongue aggreeth a thousand times more with the ENGLISH than with the LATIN. The manner of speaking is in both one, so that, in a thousand places, there needest not but to translate the HEBREW word for word." Canon Lyson found 5000 HEBREW ROOTS in the ENGLISH language (Our British Ancestors); other authorities put the figure still higher. The Welsh is so much like the Hebrew that the SAME SYNTAX may be used for both. The old SAXON language is said to be eighty percent HEBREW. The oldest poems in the CELTIC language are in the "Book of the Dun Cow" (1106 A.D.) and are "not unlike the poetical passages in the Old Testament" (5:626, Encyc. Brit. 11th).

Isaiah 28:11 says, "For with stammering lips and another tongue will he speak to this people" (Ephraim -- v.1).

[...]

Notice the English "Rabbit" comes from the Hebrew "ARNBiT" (hare), the R and A reversed, the "Adder" from "ATaR" (to encircle), the "Kitten" from "QuiToN" (a little one), "Camel" from "GeMeL" (camel) and "Elephant" and "Antelope" from "ELePH" (ox). "Steer" from "SHOOR" (ox). "Giraffe" from "GaRaPH" (the neck), "Pig" from "PiGGuL" (abomination), "Snipe" from "INSOP" (water-fowl), the letters shuffled, "Dove" from "DOoB" (to murmur). "Sparrow" from "ZaPPOR" (sparrow). "Pelican" from "PeLeG" (a stream). "Raven" and "Robin" come from "OReB" (raven), "Crow" or "Rook" from "QRAW" (to call), "Egret" from "EGORT" (a crane), "Crane" from "GaRaN" (a throat), "Gull" from "GUL" (to move in a circuit), "Swallow" from "SaLO" (quail), "Osprey" from "PeRoS" (eagle), the S put in front, "Eagle" from "AKuL" (a devourer). "Fish" from "NePHeSH" (living
creature), "Crab" from "AQRaB" (Scorpion), "Whelk" and "Leech," if we shuffle the letters, from "ELQ" (to adhere), "Haddock" from HaDDoQ" (a thorn), "Crayfish" from "ECVIS" (spider), "Wasp" from "AZB" (pain), "Moth" from "MOT" (little), "Worm" from "ORM" (naked). "Locust" from "LoQueSH" (to consume), "Gnat" from "NaD" (to fly), "Buzz" from "ZEBUB" (fly), "Shrub" from "ZhRuB" (to limit), "Berry" from "PeRi" (fruit in general), "Fruit" from "FRuCH" (to bud or blossom), "Branch" from "BRaCH" (to reach across), "Bark" from "BOOK" (to roll round), "Gum" from "GaM" (to join together), "Ash" from "AZH" (tree), "Elm" from "ALoN" (an oak), "Cypress" from "GOPHeR" (wood of Noah's ark), "Holly" from "HoLLeL"(pierces"), "Juniper" from "JuPeR" (sharp points), "Brush" from "BRuSH" (Fir), "Cedar" and "Citrus" and "Nectar" from QueTaR" (perfume), "Mistletoe" from "MaSL-TOH" (Lord of misrule). "Crocus" from "CRoCuM" (Saffron herb), "Nettle" from "NeTtO" (plant), "Squash" from "QuaSHA" (Cucumber), "Onion" from "OIN" (eye), "Cabbage" from "QaBaZH" (to gather together), "Turnip"and "Parsnip" from "NiB" (a plant), "Barley"from "BaR" (corn) plus "LaeH" (weary), "Lemon" and "Melon" from RIMMON (Pomegranate),"Peach" from "NePeCH" (citron) and "Raspberry" from "RaSP" (a red-hot coal).


More:

"Edenics: Hebrew roots found in English words" By Jeff A. Benner

I highly recommend listening to EPISODE #46 (3/29/09) of podcasts of Pastor Eli James.


Related:

The Mystery of the True Descendants of the Israelites - The White Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, and Kindred Peoples

Friday, March 20, 2009

On the real sin in the garden of Eden, and the ongoing war between the descendants of Cain and the descendants of Adam

Why Did God Create the White Race?

By Pastor Eli James

In my multi-part series on Chapters 1-6 of the Book of Genesis entitled “The Enmity,” I presented a detailed discussion of the meaning of the scripture at Genesis 3:15. Brothers and sisters, this verse is probably the most misunderstood verse in the Bible. It is also one of the most important verses in the Old Testament because it sets the theme for that whole Book…and for the White Race for the next 6,000 years.

The Seduction of Eve

Genesis 3:1-14 describes the encounter between Eve and the “serpent.” Know that the word ‘serpent’ is translated from the Hebrew ‘nachash’ which means, primarily, enchanter or deceiver. Depending upon the context of the verse, ‘nachash’ can also mean snake; but in this context it most certainly means deceiver. The same language is used by Yahshua, our Kinsman Redeemer, at John, Chapter 8, where he calls the Jewish rabbis “liars,” “vipers” and “children of the devil.”

Gen. 3:1 tells us, “Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field.” This means that this “serpent” was craftier and more fox-wise than any other humanoid in the garden, or on the earth, for that matter.

This same verse contains the expression, “beast of the field.” What is a beast of the field? Professor Charles Carroll, in his book, The Tempter of Eve, explains, from a comparative study of many verses of the Bible, that the beast of the field is capable of speech, has hands and feet, and can even worship God. Thus, the “beast of the field” is clearly a humanoid. Professor Carroll claims that it is a reference to Negroes. Whether it means Negroes or some other species is not clear to me because it can mean any or all of the other races that we know existed before Adam was formed. The fact is that we are dealing with ANOTHER RACE; and, as such, it is clear evidence that Eve was dealing with a humanoid, not a snake.

Now, the verse tells us that the serpent was more subtle than any of these people, these "beasts of the field." Since the “serpent” is being compared to a race of people, should we not consider Genesis 2-4 from the perspective that this nachash was a humanoid? The next few verses describe how nachash smoothtalks Eve into defying God’s law.

Verse 5 is a record of what nachash said to Eve: “For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.” Now, this deceiver was actually telling her the truth. It is true that God does know that, if she does what he wants, she will have known good AND evil. What the serpent was doing was piquing her interest, tempting her into an unusual experience. “You’re really gonna love this, Eve. There’s no harm. Try it, you’ll like it.” We hear this same refrain behind nightclubs and dance halls today…also in the back seats of numerous cars.

Now, since the trees of the Garden are not literal trees but FAMILY TREES, it is clear that the Serpent is telling Eve that if she allows him to seduce her, she, and more importantly her offspring, will become “as gods, knowing good and evil.” Since the word ‘knowing’ often refers to sexual intercourse, it is clear that if Eve would engage in this activity, then her offspring would indeed resemble the nachash people who were literally the fallen angels of the Bible. There are many other passages of the Bible which corroborate this idea. We are frequently told of the “sons of God” (translated from elohim, meaning “gods”) lusting after the “daughters of men.”

In other words, after the fallen angels were cast out of heaven and took human form, some as giants and some as the 4-ft tall, hook-nosed Sumerians, these fallen angels lusted after our women and other women as well. Essentially these women were raped by these fallen angels and a mixed-breed offspring resulted. These people later became known as the Canaanites because of their race-mixing with Canaan, the incest-bred son of Ham, Noah’s son.

Canaan was the son of Ham and Ham’s MOTHER. That is why Noah cursed Canaan instead of Ham. And Canaan carried this curse with him as he mixed with the non-Adamite women of Cain’s posterity.

From this history, it is clear that the episode between Eve and this nachash, whose known name at that time, according to the oldest legends, was probably Sammael, was the very first instance of race-mixing between one of our women and someone of another race. Sammael is recorded in Jewish literature as one of the highest-ranking of the fallen angels, possibly Lucifer himself. Also, the Book of Enoch, Chapter 68, provides us with a list of these fallen angels. Verses 6 & 7: "The name of the third is Gadrel, he discovered every stroke of death to the children of men. He seduced Eve; and discovered to the children of men instruments of death..." Whether it was Sammael or Gadrel does not matter for this study.

Back to Genesis, Chapter 3:

Verse 6: “And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat.” Certainly, the serpent had convinced her that the exceptional experience he promised her would be harmless. Of course, he lied. Here, the orthodox interpretation that says that Eve ate literal fruit from a literal tree is shown to be ridiculous. Are literal snakes capable of lying? Are literal trees capable of lying? How does a literal tree, or its fruit, such as the mythical apple, make one wise?

Verse 7 says: “And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.” How does eating literal fruit relate to nakedness? Why did they have to cover their genital areas with clothing if their sin was some kind of culinary mistake, namely, the eating of a mythical apple? Search all you want. There is no apple mentioned in this story.

Surely, the Father does not punish us in unusual ways. Surely, as we all know from our common law, the punishment must fit the crime! What did Adam and Eve do that required a punishment to be imposed upon their sex organs?

Verse 11: ‘Who told thee that thou wast naked? Hast thou eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat? Again, what does nakedness have to do with the eating of literal fruit?

In Verse 12, Adam tries to pass the buck, blaming his complicity on Eve. In Verse 13, Eve says: “The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat.” Now, let me remind you that one of the meanings of the word ‘beguiled’ is “seduced.” Seduction is a sexual act.

In Verse 14, Yahweh condemns the Serpent to his lowly status for the rest of his days. If the Serpent were a literal snake, how would crawling on his belly be a curse? Denominational “Christianity” would have us believe that God is saying, “Hey, you snake, from now on you will crawl on your belly like a snake!” But, clearly, the Serpent’s status is here being LOWERED TO THAT OF A SNAKE, if only in figurative language. If nachash was a literal snake, this would be no curse at all, for crawling on his belly is nothing out of the ordinary – for literal snakes!

Now, for the all-important verse 15:

AND I WILL PUT ENMITY BETWEEN THEE [NACHASH] AND THE WOMAN [EVE], AND BETWEEN THY SEED [OFFSPRING] AND HER SEED [OFFSPRING]; IT [THE COLLECTIVE OFFSPRING OF EVE] SHALL BRUISE THY HEAD, AND THOU [THE COLLECTIVE OFFSPRING OF NACHASH] SHALT BRUISE HIS HEEL.

What this verse is telling us is that the devil had offspring of Eve, namely Cain, and that Cain’s offspring would make continuous war against Eve’s and Adam’s offspring. Since Cain murdered Abel, Abel had to be replaced by Seth. Now, the rest of the Bible is the story of how Cain’s descendants and Seth’s descendants had perpetual conflict with each other. Yahweh God even instructed Seth’s descendants, the Israelites, when they were settling into the land of Canaan, TO EXTERMINATE EVERY LAST ONE OF THESE CANAANITES, EVEN THEIR INFANTS AND THEIR ANIMALS (I Sam. 15:3, Josh. 3:10, 11:7-19, and many other verses), because these people were the literal offspring of the devil himself and would be a thorn in our side (or at our heel, according to Gen. 3:15) as long as they existed.

But our ancestors failed at this commission, and that’s why we have the Jews today in total control of our society, because the Jews are the descendants of these same Canaanites.


In Verse 16, Moses records Yahweh telling Eve: “I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow shalt thou bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over you. Because Eve failed to protect the purity of her seed, and because she infused new life into the condemned seed of the fallen angels, Eve was placed into subjection to the rule of her husband, Adam; plus, Eve’s child-bearing was cursed with pain and suffering. Thus White women bear children with greater pain and anxiety than do the women of other races.

Her posterity likewise is also cursed. In Verse 17, Yahweh curses the ground of the earth because of the “tree” sin they have committed. The verse concludes with the statement: “In sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life.” This “eating” is really serious business, isn’t it? If it was just a piece of fruit, why would Yahweh heap curse upon curse, sorrow upon sorrow? Could it be because this was not the end of the eating? We are still eating the bitter fruit of race-mixing today, aren’t we?

It’s time that our women understood the serious crime against God and against nature that race-mixing is. And in this battle to educate ourselves and our women, our two worst enemies are the Jews and the so-called “Christian” churches which have become nothing more than agents for the anti-Christ, helping Lucifer/Sammael/Satan/Gadrel pollute our species with non-White seed.

The Organic View of Judgment

One might well ask: “If the Serpent seed is so evil, why doesn’t God just kill them all Himself”? It’s not that simple. If, as Revelation tells us, that the Serpent fell from heaven, and was cast down to earth for judgment with one-third of the angels that rebelled along with him (Rev. 12:4), then what we have is a cancer of the Universal Body. If one third of your body were infected by cancer, could the doctor just cut it out without killing the patient? No. The only cure for this disease is to send in the killer cells of the immune system to wipe out the cancer. Slight problem: This cancer is highly intelligent and it has fooled the White Blood Cells (Adamites) into mingling their DNA with the DNA of the cancer cells, thus compromising the immune system.

You may think that this analysis sounds more like science fiction than Bible teaching, but Paul confirms this universal illness: “For the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God [White Adamic Israel restored]. For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope, Because the creature [White people in their “cast out,” fallen state] itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God. For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now…For whom He did foreknow [you and me as White Adamites] , He did also predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren.” (Romans 8:19-29.)

We, Israel Restored, are the hope of creation. We are the antibodies that have been created to kill the disease, to crush the head of the serpent at the Judgment Day. Jesus Christ Himself will return to oversee the operation…but He has to have a willing and competent cadre of White Adamic Israelites, the Overcomers also known as the 144,000, to do the surgery according to the Plan.

Know Thine Enemy

The worst thing you can call a Jew is a “parasite.” This is the one appellation that they truly detest, because it strikes home; and, deep inside, they all know it. The history of the Jews is their parasitic relationship to the White Race. They thrive best when they can invade the White Nations and breed and multiply like a parasitic infection. The reason Jews can’t have a civilization of their own is because Yahweh cursed Cain and his seed with the inability to grow food (Gen. 4:12). Ouch! The only way the Jew can prosper is to finagle his way into White society and take control of our institutions so as to get his carcinogenic (genetically cancerous) tentacles into us and draw his sustenance from us. In the process, he steals our women and he encourages other races to mix with us so that we would become weaker and stupider and no longer be a threat to him.

Interestingly enough, there is a similar human disease which affects women much worse than men. It is called Candida. Candida yeast infection is a parasitic infection which fools the body’s immune system into attacking the body’s own cells, rather than attacking the invading yeast cells. Pretty smart, eh? Isn’t that what the Jews have done to us over the last six thousand years? The Rothschilds perfected the technique of arranging wars in which White Men of different nations slaughter each other while the Jew Bank profits. Our own Revolutionary War is an example. (We won that one!) So was the Civil War. So were WWI and WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Bosnia, Iraq, and…who’s next? The parasite has fooled us into killing each other so that he can thrive. This Serpentine intelligence is way smarter than most of us. Didn’t Jesus tell us, “Be ye therefore wise as serpents, yet gentle as doves”? The modern expression is “Know your enemy.” If we don’t know who the real enemy is, we go around shooting the wrong people. We destroy each other instead of destroying the parasites!

The importance of the Two-Seedline message is this: We, True Israel, are God’s literal offspring through Adam. The Cainite, Canaanite, Edomite, Jewish line of descent contains the literal genetic material of the fallen angels, in particular, that of nachash, the Serpent. The Adamites were sent here by the Father to clean up the racial mess that was made by the fallen angels. We were sent here to establish His Race of Adamites, now known as the Anglo-Saxon, Celtic and Caucasian peoples, in order to establish a Famliy Tree which would grow and expand and smother the Fallen Race of rebellious angels.

As the White Blood Cells of the human body are designed to destroy invading parasites, the White Race was created by Yahweh God to destroy the pestilence that has plagued our Universe since the rebellion of Lucifer put the Universe at risk of destruction! Our mission was to restore Planet Earth to its pre-invasion state. Unfortunately, they outsmarted us and many thousands of years of violence have resulted. I am tempted to speculate whether the Jews are some sort of alien species from another universe: invaders from a pestilential world of evil and hatred sent here by their god to destroy us and eat out our substance. Science fiction? Perhaps.

As you can imagine, when the White Blood Cells of our immune system attack the invading germs or parasites, any number of these organisms will have to give up their lives in order to save the Body from disease and death.

Jesus Christ set the example for us by His death at Calvary. He came to redeem our race so that we could reawaken to our destiny. The Jews and their lies have put virtually our whole Race to sleep so that their parasites could invade and destroy us at will. They have hired hundreds of "televangelists" who propogandize us with slogans like "The Jews are God's chosen people," and they corrupt our children with debauchery and race-mixing. They have even gone so far as to circulate rumors to the effect that Yahweh is THEIR GOD INSTEAD OF OUR GOD.

But the son of Yahweh was Yahshua. The name, Yahshua, in Hebrew and Aramaic, means "Yahweh Saves." The Bible clearly tells us that those who reject Jesus also reject the Father. And Jesus said "I come not but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel." That means the Anglo-Saxons of the exiled house of Israel which populated Europe while the house of Judah was preparing the way for the Messiah in the land of Judah. Yahshua (Jesus Christ) is the leader of the White Blood Cell Army which is going to destroy the fallen angels and their posterity. Only then will peace be restored to this planet and to this Universe.

The Judgment Day is the Death Sentence for the Rothschilds and their disease-ridden army of vermin parasites...or those who have eyes to see and ears to hear.

Now that you fully realize what is at stake, prepare yourselves for the SECOND COMING OF JESUS CHRIST AND THE GREAT DAY OF YAHWEH.

Saturday, March 7, 2009

Apostate Judeo-Christianity is Dying - Israelite Identity Christianity is the leading faith of the Resistance to the Satanic-Jewish NWO Conspiracy



source

Frankly, jewdeo-churchianity is dying. It has no reason to exist other than as a political faith for the benefit of the 'jew'-dominated criminal regimeists. The main-line decrepit Protestant churches are dying, as is the Roman Catholic church. (Most certainly since the ascension-by-assassination of the Polish Ashkenaz 'jew' John Paul II, as the past 20 years has seen the destruction of RC tradition keeping the RC church together.) The problem with jewdeo-churchianity is that it has gotten away from worship of Christ and has been diverted into 'New Covenant' godlessness and worship of holohoaxianity, wherein critical thinking is diverted from the upkeep of Christianity to mindless, unthinking worship of an alleged six million khazars supposedly killed by ethnic Germans. Thus both Christianity and their White worshippers are being demonized for the benefit of racial aliens who control the reins of power via the media and the government. What exactly is it in for the White Christian to continue to support mainline jewdeo-churchianity? Nothing or less-than-nothing! It tells its remaining White churchgoers that they must give up their birthright to those more numerous who earned nothing by their works, i.e. those blacks, browns, 'jews' who falsely proclaim their new faith -- everyone except those who created the naturally White racial religion of Christianity. It is now but a matter of time before there is a negro pope, and the traditional pictures of a blond, blue-eyed Christ are deemed Politically InCorrect. Thus by plan is the both the White race and its natural religion submerged under a Third-World mudslide.


However, Christian Identity offers much for the White Christian. It says that there are laws which must be followed. It says that there is a difference between right and wrong, between good and evil. It offers a fundamentalism which is deemed a welcome source of stability for those who have been cut morally adrift by mainline jewdeo-churchianity. As a racially nationalistic pro-White religion, it says that the defense and maintenance of the White Race and White Western Civilization is not only a good idea -- but that this defense is an affirmative religious duty. It clearly identifies the source of evil -- the satanic racially parasitic 'jew' leading Gog and MaGog towards the destruction and besiegement of the Camp of the Saints -- and confirms that it is a religious duty to first resist, and then prevail. Those who fight this necessary Just & Holy War are the Saints, and shall be with Christ in Paradise while the wicked perish with the Beast and False Prophet.

Can you see why Christian Israeliteism is hated so much by the 'jews' and the criminal regime they dominate? Every CI religionist is a White Nationalist Revolutionist. We will never, ever compromise with the Evil Empire, and we think this satanic criminal regime must be destroyed absolutely, not 'reformed.'

So far in this civil war the fiercest fighters against the Evil Empire have been the CI Resistance soldier naturally organized into undetectable 'cells' and lone-wolves. The 'organized' compounds of the Covenant, Arm, and Sword of the Lord, Elohim City, and Aryan Nations have allowed themselves to be compromised by allowing all manner of criminal regimeist rabble to infiltrate them, and even to let Manchurian Oswalds to be recruited from amongst them to feed the propaganda mills of the NWO/ZOG. However, the CI religion has free-thinking people in it who will not put up with any 'pope' and these compromised compounds are now avoided by the devout. Today the CI faith consists of scattered families largely undetectable by the criminal regime until one of them chooses to strike. There are several CI churches which "feed the flock" and which have a following via mail, the Internet, or shortwave. Thus we are not a 'cult' like Jim Jones or David Koresh in which the charismatic leader gives orders to his moronic sheeplike followers, but rather a decentralized loose network of fellow believers of a mixture of the two doxologies of Covenant and Dual-Seedline. The end result is a family-oriented religion in which there is a 'natural leader' or two in every family.

This is militarily useful in that it creates in each CI family a natural cadre of disciplined, motivated Resistance soldiers already formed into uninfiltraitable 'cells' which are naturally and extraordinarily useful for fighting revolutionary guerrilla civil warfare. The decentralized CI Church structure allows for these cells to coalesce into larger company- and battalion-sized units led by the militant pastors, elders, deacons, and leading fathers. Thus this decentralized CI network can field a quality military organization from squad to company-level sized, and when this civil war has progressed to the point of there being no equivalently organized military/political force in the county, these CI commandos will thus be by default the only source of organized civil/military order. Thus the Christian Identity religion will be in the same position as what happened during the collapse of the Roman Empire, when the Christian Church was the only organized cohesive force, and it picked up all the marbles.

Thus Christian Identity is a religion not of the masses, but rather a religion of the natural aristocracy of rural White America. Its doctrines never, ever "steps on its own tail" because it is a strait-forward religion which puts Christ and People first. Selfish, self-serving people are not attracted to CI, and if they wander in they will hear things which will make them uncomfortable very quickly. Thus it is a family-oriented religion which goes to the heart of Christianity, and in its allegiance to "Duty, Honor, Country (as an extended Family)" is intensely patriotic. With its militant Christian virtues and natural organization into family, Church, and local community units, it is no wonder that Identity Christianity is so represented in the Resistance Movement. Louis Beam, a Christian Israelite of the Covenant doxology, when he wrote Resistance military doctrine of "Leaderless Resistance" may well have borrowed from the from Patriots from the
1960's and 1776, however it is quite possible that Louis Beam also unconsciously took the natural family structure of rural CI congregations into account when Beam wrote the essay which made him famous.

I hope that I have thus sketched an introduction of the nature of Christian Identity, why it is a growing, dynamic faith now that White America has been spiritually abandoned by jewdeo-churchianity, why it is the leading faith of the Resistance element, and its political and military nature by which it shall prevail against the NWO/ZOG globalist conspirators and eventually become the leading faith of what remains of Western Civilization and Christendom.

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Not For All



From Wheeler MacPherson of Caucasian Literary Review:

The immigration mess is on every "conservative's" mind, including the countless judeoxtians who don't dare speak the true thoughts sifting through their Scofielded and Pipered brains.

But if Americans properly understood to whom and for whom Christ's saving gospel is intended, we never would have exposed this country and her resources to the flood of hating aliens. America's skirts have been lifted, and now she is being raped by strangers.

The mindset and worldview that allows foreigners to slosh across our borders - foreigners who are not our fathers' posterity, who do not share our race, culture, language, or faith - can be at least partially traced back to a perverted view of the gospel. If we ignore the clear scriptural teaching that the Lord Jesus Christ came for His people, the lost sheep of the house of Israel, then we must accept the lie that passes for truth in virtually all Christian and judeoxtian circles today: that Christ came for all, that His plan for the new heavens and the new earth includes a multicultural stew of redeemed humanity.

The Bible does not teach any such thing.

But the majority of churchgoers today truly believe that it does. And this belief influences and colors their daily actions and their politics. If the gospel is for everyone...if the scriptures were written for humanity at large...then it follows that a country should seek to become a "melting pot," or "salad bowl," or "rainbow," or whatever good Stars 'n Stripers are calling this place that was once a nation. None will be turned away. None can be turned away, you see.

This ideology is the bastard child of the two parents, Ignorance and Apostasy. As long as the dominant voices in today's "Christianity" continue to teach that Christ came for those for whom He most certainly did not come, this bastard child will wax larger and stronger, and will grow in favor with antichrist and deracinated man. The foreigners who are sucking up public resources and defecating in once-beautiful communties are coming for our churches, too. Make no mistake about this. Even now, congregation after congregation pursues "outreach programs" designed to bring strangers into the pews, into fellowship...and ultimately, into miscegenistic "marriages" between their people and our people. The church's skirts have been lifted, and the stranger is titillated by what he has seen.

We must return to the holy scriptures, and read them in their purity, and pray for God's spirit to open our eyes. When by His grace and mercy we do open our eyes, we will see that His idea of evangelism is quite different from what we've been taught. And then we will begin to turn to our own kinfolk, and to be burdened for their salvation to the point of groaning in our souls.

But until that time, our Lord's words to the Edomite Jew Pharisees can be applied to our own people:

"You are in error," said Jesus in reply to them, "Through not comprehending the Scriptures, not yet the power of God."
[Matthew 22:29]


Related:

The Mystery of the True Descendants of the Israelites - The White Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, and Kindred Peoples

Yahweh Prohibits Race-Mixing and Commands Racial Purity and Segregation