Showing posts with label Jewish-Controlled Government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jewish-Controlled Government. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

'Anti-semite' Helen Thomas rehashes 'vicious anti-jewish canard'



'Virulent anti-semite' or simply an old lady who's old enough that she's no longer afraid to tell the truth?





In an interview with Playboy magazine, Helen Thomas says that Jewish Zionists "totally control" the White House, Congress, Hollywood, and Wall Street.



[...]

PLAYBOY: Let’s get to something else you said more recently. In a speech in Detroit last December, you told an Arab group, “We are owned by the propagandists against the Arabs. There’s no question about that. Congress, the White House and Hollywood, Wall Street, are owned by the Zionists. No question, in my opinion. They put their money where their mouth is. We’re being pushed into a wrong direction in every way.” Do you stand by that statement?

THOMAS: Yes, I do. I know it was horrendous, but I know it’s true. Tell me it’s not true and I’ll be happy to be contradicted. I’m just saying they’re using their power, and they have power in every direction.

PLAYBOY: That stereotype of Jewish control has been around for more than a century. Do you actually think there’s a secret Jewish conspiracy at work in this country?

THOMAS: Not a secret. It’s very open. What do you mean secret?

PLAYBOY: Well, for instance, explain the connection between Hollywood and what’s happening with the Palestinians.

THOMAS: Power over the White House, power over Congress.

PLAYBOY: By way of contributions?

THOMAS: Everybody is in the pocket of the Israeli lobbies, which are funded by wealthy supporters, including those from Hollywood. Same thing with the financial markets. There’s total control.

PLAYBOY: Who are you thinking about specifically? Who are the Jews with the most influence?

THOMAS: I’m not going to name names. What, am I going to name the Ponzi guy on Wall Street [Bernard Madoff] or the others? No.

PLAYBOY: Then how do you make the claim that Jews are running the country?

THOMAS: I want you to look at the Congress that just came in. Do you think [New York Democratic senator Charles] Schumer and Lehtinen—whatever her name is—in Florida [Republican representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, a strong supporter of Israel] are going to be pro-Arab? No. But they’re going to be very influential. Eric Cantor, the majority leader of the Republicans, do you think he’s going to be for the Arabs? Hell no! I’m telling you, you cannot get 330 votes in Congress for anything that’s pro-Arab. Nothing. If you’re not in, you’re eased out, just as Senator William Fulbright was in the 1960s [after claiming that millions of tax-deductible dollars from American philanthropies were being sent to Israel and then funneled back to the U.S. for distribution to organizations with pro-Israel positions]. Congressman Paul Findley from a little old rural district in Illinois made the mistake of shaking hands with Yasir Arafat years ago. It ended up costing him his reelection. He later wrote a book called They Dare to Speak Out about how impossible it is to have a position in this country that takes on Israel. Maybe there is a handful that can, but in general you cannot speak against any Zionist movement in this country.

PLAYBOY: Do you begrudge people like Steven Spielberg? He created the Shoah Foundation to chronicle the life stories of Holocaust survivors. What’s your feeling about him?

THOMAS: There’s nothing wrong with remembering it, but why do we have to constantly remember? We’re not at fault. I mean, if they’re going to put a Holocaust museum in every city in Germany, that’s fine with me. But we didn’t do this to the Jews. Why do we have to keep paying the price and why do they keep oppressing the Palestinians? Do the Jews ever look at themselves? Why are they always right? Because they have been oppressed throughout history, I know. And they have this persecution. That’s true, but they shouldn’t use that to dominate.

PLAYBOY: In America you’re talking about a relatively small community. Jews make up roughly two percent of the U.S. population. On a worldwide level, the percentage is well under one percent. Those numbers don’t exactly spell domination.

THOMAS: I get where you’re leading with this. You know damn well the power they have. It isn’t the two percent. It’s real power when you own the White House, when you own these other places in terms of your political persuasion. Of course they have power. You don’t deny that. You’re Jewish, aren’t you?

PLAYBOY: Yes.

THOMAS: That’s what I thought. Well, you know damn well they have power.

PLAYBOY: Why did it take you so long to speak out like this?

THOMAS: It hasn’t taken that long. I’ve told all my friends and so forth. This has been an issue for me since I first came to Washington.

PLAYBOY: You’ve kept quiet publicly since the 1940s?

THOMAS: It was certainly on my mind back then. The United Nations Partition Plan was being debated at the UN and in the Arab community, and I knew what the Arabs were going through since I have an Arab background. I was part of that community. Like I said, I’ve never hesitated to tell my views to all my friends. They knew exactly where I stood. But I finally wanted to speak the truth. And I think I’m old enough to get away with it. Well, almost. Not quite.

[...]


http://www.playboy.com/articles/helen-thomas-playboy-interview/index.html

Saturday, August 21, 2010

The reason for the Iraq War





March 20, 2003 - The war now dubbed "Operation Iraqi Freedom" begins


7+ years, at the cost of $750 billion, and the lives of 4,400+ Americans and tens of thousands of Iraqis








Fighting and Dying In Iraq, but for what?












No, Virginia, it is not about WMDs











Nor is it about "liberating" the Iraqi people from Saddam Hussein and "spreading freedom and democracy" to Iraq









The Truth



War planned years in advance by Jewish 'Neo-Cons'

The "neo-conservative" think tank Project for a New American Century (PNAC), founded and consisting predominantly of Zionist Jews including many dual Israeli-US citizens, planned a war against Iraq as early as 2000, citing the need for US Military control of the Gulf region. The PNAC reports were based upon earlier Israeli defense strategy papers authored by future PNAC members Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, and David Wurmser. [1] [2]










Lies about "threat of WMDs" fabricated as pretext for war

" Seven months before the invasion of Iraq, the head of British foreign intelligence reported to Prime Minister Tony Blair that President Bush wanted to topple Saddam Hussein by military action and warned that in Washington intelligence was "being fixed around the policy," according to notes of a July 23, 2002, meeting with Blair at No. 10 Downing Street. " [3]











Niger Yellowcake Forgery

To support the claim that Iraq was seeking weapons of mass destruction, the Bush administration used foreign 'intelligence' alleging Iraq had tried to purchase nuclear material from Niger. This 'intelligence' was completely fabricated, and the State Department and CIA even knew it was false at the time. [4]











A Massive Hoax on the American People and the World

February 5, 2003 - Then Secretary of State Colin Powell addressed the United Nations Security Council on the urgent need to wage war against Iraq, citing the Niger Yellowcake forgery as "indisputable" evidence that Iraq was developing nuclear weapons.

Powell's Former Chief of Staff Lawrence Wilkerson later admitted this pre-war 'intelligence' was "a hoax on the American people." [5]










Israel aided US and Britain in fraudulent 'intelligence' in push for war

Brigadier-General Shlomo Brom, former deputy commander of the Israeli military's planning division, admitted in a report by an Israeli military research center that Israeli intelligence services and political leaders were a 'full partner' and provided "an exaggerated assessment of Iraqi capabilities", raising "the possibility that the intelligence picture was manipulated." [6]











Iraq Was Not a Threat to the United States, but rather to the Jewish State of 'Israel'

Jewish Neo-con and at the time member of the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, Philip Zelikow, stated in a speech months before the war:

"Why would Iraq attack America or use nuclear weapons against us? I'll tell you what I think the real threat [is] and actually has been since 1990 - it's the threat against Israel...And this is the threat that dare not speak its name, because the Europeans don't care deeply about that threat, I will tell you frankly. And the American government doesn't want to lean too hard on it rhetorically, because it is not a popular sell." [7]










A U.S. Congressman dares to tell the truth

At a March 3rd, 2003 antiwar forum in Reston, Virginia, outside Washington, Congressman Rep. Jim Moran, D-Virginia, said "If it were not for the strong support of the Jewish community for this war with Iraq, we would not be doing this." [8]











Israeli Jews Openly Acknowledge Jews Were Driving Force Behind the War

Israeli journalist Ari Shavit admits, "The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history." [9]











Ariel Sharon: "We, the Jewish people control America"

Israel Radio (Kol Yisrael) reported on Oct. 3, 2001, that Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, had boasted at a Cabinet meeting, "I want to tell you something very clear, don't worry about American pressure on Israel, we, the Jewish people control America, and the Americans know it."











Is Iran Next?

Israeli politicians, Jewish neo-cons, and zionist lapdogs are now urging the United States to attack Iran, using the same tactic of squealing about "nukes" and "WMDs". [10]

Retired general Wesley Clark even admitted that "New York Money People" are driving the U.S. to war with Iran. [11]









Summary


The nation of Iraq was a threat to the Jewish State, and an obstacle to the plans of International Jewry for their planned "New World Order." The 'rogue' Iraqi people were not integrating into the globalist new international order, without a central bank controlled by the Rothschild/Jewish banking cabal. Control of Iraq's vast oil reserves is a bonus. The Zionist Jews who control the U.S. government used the might of the U.S. Military to advance the agenda.








Sources:

[1] "Bush Planned Iraq 'Regime Change' Before Becoming President" (The Sunday Herald)
[2] Iraq: A War For Israel By Mark Weber
[3] "British Intelligence Warned of Iraq War" (Washington Post)
[4] "Niger uranium forgeries" (wikipedia)
[5] Colin Powell's Former Chief Of Staff Wilkerson Calls Pre-War Intelligence A 'Hoax On The American People' (PBS)
[6] "Israel linked to Iraq intelligence failure, general says" (Washington Post)
[7] "Iraq was invaded 'to protect Israel' - US official" (Asia Times)
[8] "Lawmaker under fire for saying Jews support Iraq war" (CNN)
[9] "White man's burden" (Haaretz)
[10] "Israel Prodding U.S. To Attack Iran" (CBS)
[11] "Top Dem Wesley Clark Says ‘N.Y. Money People’ Pushing War With Iran" (Forward)









Other Articles of Interest:

- The War in Afghanistan is about the Jewish controlled Heroin Industry
- "Cover Up In Oklahoma" - The 1995 Bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City an Obvious False Flag
- 1946 King David Hotel Bombing - Zionist 'Israel' the Founding Fathers of Modern Terrorism
- An introduction to 'The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion' - Blueprint for Jewish World Conquest
- The Horror of Anti-Semitism - Why Do People Hate the Jews?
- More proof that the Jews started WWII - Testimony from distinguished diplomats
- New book by military historian Robert Wilcox documents the assassination of General George Patton

Friday, August 6, 2010

2010 Rasmussen poll: Only 23% of Americans believe Government represents the peoples' interests




The "sheeple" are awakening. The "conspiracy nuts" are not a "small minority", but now the majority of the populace.

I see evidence of this all over. In the last month, I met and talked to three co-workers at my place of employment (employs 12 people) who all listen to Hannity and Rush radio, yet are also aware of various aspects of the NWO conspiracy - including the malevolent nature of Freemasonry, Denver airport weird murals and masonic symbology, Bilderberg Group, fake moon landing, etc.

It's now a matter of moving the battle beyond the "internet world" and starting to speak publicly and openly (soberly, face-to-face with others, at church/civic and other gatherings, etc) about the NWO conspiracy and those directing it, forming an organized resistance, and routing the jewish conspirators and their lackeys from positions of power.

23% Say U.S. Government Has the Consent of the Governed

Rasmussen Reports
Friday, July 16, 2010

The notion that governments derive their only just authority from the consent of the governed is a foundational principle of the American experiment.

However, a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 23% of voters nationwide believe the federal government today has the consent of the governed. Sixty-two percent (62%) say it does not, and 15% are not sure.

These figures have barely budged since February.

There is no gender gap on this question. Younger voters are more likely than their elders to believe the government today has the necessary consent. Among voters under 30, 28% say the government has that consent. Just 15% of senior citizens share that view.

From an ideological perspective, most liberal voters (58%) think the federal government has the consent of the governed. Most moderates (57%) and most conservatives (84%) disagree.

Democrats are closely divided on the question. Republicans and unaffiliated voters strongly reject the notion that the government has the consent of the governed.

The survey of 1,000 Likely Voters was conducted on July 12-13, 2010 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.

In his new book, In Search of Self-Governance, Scott Rasmussen observes that the American people are “united in the belief that our political system is broken, that politicians are corrupt and that neither major political party has the answers.” He adds that “the gap between Americans who want to govern themselves and the politicians who want to rule over them may be as big today as the gap between the colonies and England during the 18th century.”

The book earned positive reviews from Larry Sabato, Pat Caddell, Bill Kristol, Joe Trippi and others. In Search of Self-Governance is available from Rasmussen Reports and at Amazon.com.

Data released yesterday finds that 68% of voters believe the Political Class doesn’t care what most Americans think. Earlier polling shows that 59% are embarrassed by the behavior of the Political Class.

Rasmussen Reports has documented the wide gap between perceptions of the Political Class and Mainstream voters. To measure this gap, the firm has created a Political Class Index based upon three polling questions. Mainstream voters tend to trust the wisdom of the crowd more than the wisdom of politicians and are skeptical of the government and its relationship with big business.

Not surprisingly, only four percent (4%) of Mainstream Voters think the Political Class cares.

Over the past couple of years, most Americans have opposed many initiatives of the Political Class including the bailouts of the financial and auto industries. Additionally, most voters still favor repeal of the national health care plan and overwhelmingly disagree with the Justice Department's decision to challenge Arizona's new immigration law in court.

Fifty-five percent (55%) don’t even think most members of Congress pay all the taxes they owe.

Voters are evenly divided over the notion that a group of people randomly selected from the phone book could do a better job than the current Congress.

One reason for skepticism about the Political Class is that 70% believe Big Government and Big Business are on the same team working together against the rest of us.


http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/july_2010/23_say_u_s_government_has_the_consent_of_the_governed


Related:

Jews' corporate "news" media's credibility plunges to new low; 63% believe it frequently lies; Only ~25% think it is truthful & unbiased

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Israeli cabinet convenes in Berlin to mark Holyhoax, push for war with Iran, and acquire 6th submarine from Germany

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and German Chancellor Angela Merkel warned that Iran will face new sanctions if it doesn't change course on its nuclear program

Israel in historic meeting to mark Holocaust

By Aron Heller, Associated Press
Tuesday, 19 January 2010

Israel's cabinet has convened for the first time in Berlin, in a joint meeting with the German cabinet to symbolise the nations' strong bond 60 years after the Holocaust.

The focus, though, was not on threats gone by but on one that may loom in the future — the possibility of a nuclear-armed Iran.

After the joint session, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and German Chancellor Angela Merkel warned that Iran will face new sanctions if it doesn't change course on its nuclear program.

Netanyahu used the occasion to highlight the gravity of the Iranian threat.

"We know from recent history that a regime that tyrannizes its own people will tyrannize the world," he said.

Germany's efforts to curb Iran's nuclear ambitions figured high on the agenda, and Merkel said her country would back tougher sanctions against Iran if it did not curtail its nuclear program.

"If Iran's reactions don't change, we will help work on comprehensive sanctions," Merkel said.

Germany has long been part of the group of nations seeking to address concerns over Iran's nuclear ambitions, which Israel and most of the West believe is meant to develop weapons. Israel considers a nuclear Iran a threat to its existence and has hinted it might attack Iran if international diplomacy fails.

Netanyahu pressed hard for sanctions, saying the time has come to confront Iran's Islamic regime.

"If we don't apply sanctions, crippling sanctions, against this Iranian tyranny, when shall we apply them?" he asked. "If not now, when?"

A high-ranking Israeli defense official, speaking on condition of anonymity because the talks are in early stages, said Jerusalem has recently begun discussing the possibility of acquiring a sixth submarine built by Germany. It already has three, and two more are under construction. Israel is also interested in German-made Meko-a 100 warships. Israeli officials were expected to ask about purchasing technology used on these ships. Israel would then manufacture its own ship with the technology, the official said.

Environmental issues, economic cooperation and efforts to restart the Middle East peace process were also discussed during the one-day visit by Netanyahu and six of his ministers — including his defense and foreign ministers.

The trip was originally scheduled for late November, but was put off at the last moment when Netanyahu fell ill with a viral infection.

The Cabinet meeting began after a joint visit to Berlin's Holocaust memorial, which consists of a field of 2,711 gray slabs that serve as a tribute to the Holocaust's 6 million Jewish victims.

Netanyahu signed the memorial's guest book with thanks for the "invaluable preservation of the Holocaust."

Israel was established three years after the end of World War II. Since then, Germany has paid $39.4 billion in compensation to Holocaust survivors in Israel, 250,000 of whom are still alive.

Since the two countries established diplomatic ties in 1965, Germany has become perhaps Israel's strongest ally in Europe.

"Germany faces, without flinching for a second, the darkest chapters of its past it order to build a brighter future for its people and for the world," Netanyahu said. "It is something we deeply appreciate, something that has momentous historic significance."

Yesterday's session followed a historic visit in March 2008 by German Chancellor Angela Merkel and her Cabinet to mark the 60th anniversary of Israel's independence. During that three-day visit, Merkel addressed the Israeli parliament in German, and expressed shame over the Holocaust. The 20-minute speech earned Merkel a standing ovation.

Israeli and German governments plan to hold joint Cabinet sessions once a year in the future. Germany has such arrangements with five other nations.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/israel-in-historic-meeting-to-mark-holocaust-1871998.html

Monday, January 11, 2010

Anti-semitic moment on C-SPAN with ex-CIA analyst Michael Scheuer



CALLER "John" from Franklin, New York: "Good morning. I for one am sick and tired of all these Jews coming on C-SPAN and other stations, and pushing us to go to war against our Muslim friends.

They're willing to spend the last drop of American blood and treasure to get their way in the world. They have way too much power in this country. People like Wolfowitz and Feith and the other neocons that Jew'd us into Iraq...and now we're going to spend the next sixty years rehabilitating our soldiers. I'm sick and tired of it."

Michael Scheurer: "I think that American foreign policy is eventually up to the American people. One of the big things we have not been able to discuss in this country for the last thirty years is our policy towards the Israelis.

Whether we want to be involved in fighting Israel's wars in the future is something that Americans should be able to talk about. They may vote yes. They may want to see their kids to be killed in Iraq or Yemen or somewhere else to protect Israel, but the question is, we need to talk about it. Ultimately, Israel is a country of no particular worth to the United States, strategically, they have no resources we need, their manpower is minimal, their association with us is a negative for the United States - now that's a fact. What you're going to do about that fact is entirely different; but for anyone to stand up in the United States and say that our support for Israel doesn't hurt us in the Muslim world, or our support for Hosni Mubarack's dictatorship doesn't hurt us, is just to defy reality."


Scheuer on the power and influence of the Jewish lobby on the US Government:

Michael Scheuer entered into the controversy surrounding the Mearsheimer and Walt paper on the "Israel Lobby". He said to NPR that Mearsheimer and Walt are basically right. Israel, according to Scheuer, has engaged in one of the most successful campaigns to influence public opinion in the United States ever conducted by a foreign government. Scheuer said to NPR that "They [Mearsheimer and Walt] should be credited for the courage they have had to actually present a paper on the subject. [1]


Flashback: Jewish-Zionist control of U.S. Government confirmed by preeminent political scholars John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt

Monday, September 21, 2009

Flashback: Jewish-Zionist control of U.S. Government confirmed by preeminent political scholars John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt



John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt



Pro-Israel lobby in U.S. under attack

WASHINGTON, March 20,2006 (UPI) -- Two of America's top scholars have published a searing attack on the role and power of Washington's pro-Israel lobby in a British journal, warning that its "decisive" role in fomenting the Iraq war is now being repeated with the threat of action against Iran. And they say that the Lobby is so strong that they doubt their article would be accepted in any U.S.-based publication.

Professor John Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago, author of "The Tragedy of Great Power Politics" and Professor Stephen Walt of Harvard's Kenney School, and author of "Taming American Power: The Global Response to U.S. Primacy," are leading figures American in academic life.

They claim that the Israel lobby has distorted American policy and operates against American interests, that it has organized the funneling of more than $140 billion dollars to Israel and "has a stranglehold" on the U.S. Congress, and its ability to raise large campaign funds gives its vast influence over Republican and Democratic administrations, while its role in Washington think tanks on the Middle East dominates the policy debate.

And they say that the Lobby works ruthlessly to suppress questioning of its role, to blacken its critics and to crush serious debate about the wisdom of supporting Israel in U.S. public life.

"Silencing skeptics by organizing blacklists and boycotts -- or by suggesting that critics are anti-Semites -- violates the principle of open debate on which democracy depends," Walt and Mearsheimer write.

"The inability of Congress to conduct a genuine debate on these important issues paralyses the entire process of democratic deliberation. Israel's backers should be free to make their case and to challenge those who disagree with them, but efforts to stifle debate by intimidation must be roundly condemned," they add, in the 12,800-word article published in the latest issue of The London Review of Books.

The article focuses strongly on the role of the "neo-conservatives" within the Bush administration in driving the decision to launch the war on Iraq.

"The main driving force behind the war was a small band of neo-conservatives, many with ties to the Likud," Mearsheimer and Walt argue." Given the neo-conservatives' devotion to Israel, their obsession with Iraq, and their influence in the Bush administration, it isn't surprising that many Americans suspected that the war was designed to further Israeli interests."

"The neo-conservatives had been determined to topple Saddam even before Bush became president. They caused a stir early in 1998 by publishing two open letters to Clinton, calling for Saddam's removal from power. The signatories, many of whom had close ties to pro-Israel groups like JINSA (Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs) or WINEP (Washington Institute for Near Eastern Policy), and who included Elliot Abrams, John Bolton, Douglas Feith, William Kristol, Bernard Lewis, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz, had little trouble persuading the Clinton administration to adopt the general goal of ousting Saddam. But they were unable to sell a war to achieve that objective. They were no more able to generate enthusiasm for invading Iraq in the early months of the Bush administration. They needed help to achieve their aim. That help arrived with 9/11. Specifically, the events of that day led Bush and Cheney to reverse course and become strong proponents of a preventive war," Walt and Mearsheimer write.

The article, which is already stirring furious debate in U.S. academic and intellectual circles, also explores the historical role of the Lobby.

"For the past several decades, and especially since the Six-Day War in 1967, the centerpiece of US Middle Eastern policy has been its relationship with Israel," the article says."

"The combination of unwavering support for Israel and the related effort to spread 'democracy' throughout the region has inflamed Arab and Islamic opinion and jeopardized not only U.S. security but that of much of the rest of the world. This situation has no equal in American political history. Why has the U.S. been willing to set aside its own security and that of many of its allies in order to advance the interests of another state?" Professors Walt and Mearsheimer add.

"The thrust of U.S. policy in the region derives almost entirely from domestic politics, and especially the activities of the 'Israel Lobby'. Other special-interest groups have managed to skew foreign policy, but no lobby has managed to divert it as far from what the national interest would suggest, while simultaneously convincing Americans that U.S. interests and those of the other country - in this case, Israel -- are essentially identical," they add.

[...]
http://www.upi.com/InternationalIntelligence/view.php?StoryID=20060320-124726-1902r



The "Israeli Lobby" has a "stranglehold on Congress" and "vast influence over Republican and Democratic administrations"? Fanatical pro-Israel Jewish neo-conservatives were the "driving force" behind the Iraq War? They work "ruthlessly" to suppress criticism and debate of Zionist/Israeli influence, including smearing critics with charges of "anti-Semitism"? And they have power over the press as to prevent publication of this article (and other similar criticism)?

I guess those "anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists" who allege powerful Jewish-Zionist influence on our government and media were RIGHT after all!


Full paper, "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy" from London Review of Books website

Link to paper in pdf format from Harvard's website

Monday, September 14, 2009

James Traficant returns from prison; Going after La Kosher Nostra "big time"; says State of Israel has "powerful stranglehold" on US Government

MUST SEE interview.



1:14-1:37: TRAFICANT: "You know I was the number one target of the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee...And I have big enemies, but I have some grudges. And I want to go at 'em. I want to go at 'em big time."



6:23-8:59 TRAFICANT: "This may be...and you don't want to hear it...I don't know...and I certainly don't want to hurt you on your show because you are one of the best. You're fair.

But I believe that Israel has a powerful stranglehold on the American government. They control both members of the House, the House and the Senate. They have us involved in wars in which we have little or no interest.

Our children are coming back in body bags. Our nation is bankrupt over these wars. And if you open your mouth, you get targeted. And if they don't beat you at the polls, they'll put you in prison
.




TRAFICANT: The grudge is not necessarily a grudge. It's an objective assessment that no one will have the courage to speak about.

They're controlling much of our foreign policy. They're influencing much of our domestic policy.

Wolfowitz as undersecretary of defense manipulated President Bush number two back into Iraq. They've pushed definitely, definitely to try to get Bush before he left to move into Iran.

We're conducting the expansionist policy of Israel and everybody's afraid to say it. They control much of the media, they control much of the commerce of the country, and they control powerfully both bodies of the Congress. They own the Congress
.


VAN SUSTEREN: Are you an anti-Semite?

TRAFICANT: No, I'm not. And that's exactly what they're going to say. And I expect that.

What I am is an American. You see, I think America comes first. And we have a one-sided foreign policy in the Mideast, and we've alienated Arabs who have no way of fighting.



Greta, I'm saying this. America is in danger if America doesn't take back their government without foreign influence, interference.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

- James Traficant, September 10, 2009, "On the Record with Greta Van Susteren"


Jimmy “The Bull” Traficante’s Message to Organized Jewish Interests–”Payback’s a Bitch, Baby”

The Ugly Truth
Published September 13, 2009

Dearly beloved, on this solemn September 11th weekend, let us observe a moment of silence, not only for the 3,000 Americans killed (whose deaths Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Bubba Netanyahu characterized as “good” because it would generate “immediate sympathy” for Israel) but rather for those living who wish they were dead…

Who? Well, I can’t really name names, but I know they exist and are going through a veritable hell on earth right now, a holocaust of sorts that would scare the B-Jesus out of even the most battle-hardened veterans dealing with hazardous duty.

What I am talking about of course are those poor, lowly gentile slobs tasked with the truly horrific chore of changing Abe “The Weisel” Foxman’s diapers following the now-infamous interview appearing on Fox News between former Congressman Jim Traficante and Greta Van Susteren.

Foxman at the ADL (as well as his other partners in crime in sister organizations such as AIPAC, WJC, AJC et al) must be a real handful right now, no pun intended. No doubt, following Traficante’s release from the prison cell to which he had been kept prisoner by Jewish interests for daring to stand up against them years earlier and his debut on Fox News where he gave just a sampling of the kinds of songs he will be singing in the days and weeks to come, no doubt Abe and the rest of the made men in the Kosher Nostra gang have been stinking up the place pretty bad with all their kvetching, wailing and gnashing of teeth.

The reasons for their collective tummy-ache is not that difficult to discern. No doubt assuming his 7-year stay in prison had broken his otherwise-indomitable spirit, the fact that Traficante has come out bucking like a rodeo bull could not have come at a worse time as far as Jewish interests are concerned. It is after all taking place at a time when the narcotic effects of the Zionist potion poured into the community well in America are beginning to wear off and growing numbers of Americans are beginning to awaken from their trance. Parents who lost sons and daughters serving in the US Military are now realizing with dawning horror that their loved ones were robbed from them the way a pack of wolves carries off calves from the flock…Breaking news stories are beginning to pop up with semi-regularity depicting shysters like Bernie Madoff and organ harvesting/gun wielding rabbis as they are hauled off in chains by American Law enforcement officers.

In short, mob lawyers such as Foxman et al tasked with the job of getting their client–meaning powerful Jewish interests–acquitted of all charges despite the fact they themselves know they are guilty as hell–have their hands full as it is, but then to have Traficante come strolling out and announce on one of the most widely-viewed news networks that he has “grudges” that he is out to remedy “big time” obviously cannot be seen as welcome news for the you-know-whos. It is no different than mob boss Michael Corleone finding out that Frank Pentangeli was alive and was singing like a bird about everything he knew concerning the inner workings of “the family” at a time things are falling apart piece by piece.

Not that Jimmy “the Bull” Traficante’s story of being set up for prison–for all intents and purposes a mob hit arranged by powerful Jewish interests–would likely receive any attention from an American people more interested in how many pounds Britney Spears put on this week than an act of political gangsterism that robbed an otherwise-innocent man of 7 years of his life. Rather, it is the fact that as a member of the US House spending a lot of time in the belly of the beast, he saw and heard things that the “made men” of La Kosher Nostra prefer not be discussed in public, things dealing with Israel’s attack on the USS Liberty, the Jewish spy Jonathon Pollard, Israeli spying before and after 9/11, the dancing Mossad officers arrested on 9/11, Israel’s connection to the mailing of the anthrax letters and–as Greta Van Susteren said in the intro to the Fox News interview–So much more…

In short, Jimmy “The Bull” knows where all the bodies are buried, who pulled the trigger in these various “hits” and a whole host of other items that would no doubt leave otherwise-uninterested/uninformed Americans wide-eyed and speechless.

And no one should have any doubts that this is exactly what Traficante has in mind. You don’t come out in front of the entire world and start off your very first interview claiming that powerful Jewish interests were the ones responsible for throwing you in the hole for 7 years and then decide to clam up afterwards. When he states clearly that the Jewish state is scamming Americans to the tune of $15 billion a year at a time when Americans are being thrown out of their homes, and then going further by bringing the math of it home in a personal way, saying that this equates to as much as $30,000 a year for every man woman and child he is laying down the gauntlet. When he discusses the “stranglehold” that Jewish interests have over the American government, expanding this by pointing out these interests control the media and commerce of America and that the reason America is going bankrupt is because of her being used as Israel’s bitch in implementing an “expansionist” policy in the Middle East on the behalf of the Jews, resulting in America’s children coming home in “body bags” he is letting the powers-that-be know he is playing hardball.

In effect, Traficante spent 7 years mulling over what he would do when he got out, imagining every conceivable chess move he and his enemies would make and is now bringing those imaginings to life and doing so with a smile on his face, all the while reminding the thugs and crooks responsible for putting him in prison that old saying about paybacks being a bitch.

The theory that Traficante means to settle business on “unfinished accounts” with Jewish interests and that these interests know his testimony could deliver near-fatal blows to them is evident in how they are characterizing his interview on Fox News. From New York to DC to Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, all media outlets in control of La Kosher Nostra are working in collusion to taint his testimony before it hits the ears of Americans by characterizing it as –surprise, surprise–”anti-Semitic” and nothing more than the “spewing” of “conspiracy theories”, no different in its flavor than the same worn-out response wise guys use to give decades ago when asked about the existence of the criminal underworld which was, “There’s no such thing as the Mafia”.

Indeed, a fight is building–much like the collision of pockets of hot and cold air resulting in a tornado of sorts–between powerful Jewish interests whose organically-criminal behavior has resulted in legions of enemies springing up around them and those they have bullied. All those who have hungered and thirsted for justice in wanting to see these powerful Jewish interests get what they deserve will indeed get their fill, just as one wise man promised.

The one thing all should hope for is that the upcoming gang war will leave something salvageable in its aftermath, which, given the maniacal, genocidal mindset of these same powerful criminal Jewish interests involved, can only be a case of “we’ll see.”

(c) 2009 Mark Glenn

Saturday, April 25, 2009

Obama's blatant betrayal on war and foreign policy - "Change" a total farce - Jewish new world order agenda continues unabated



Obama Administration Embraces Bush Position on Warrantless Wiretapping and Secrecy

EFF
April 6th, 2009

San Francisco - The Obama administration formally adopted the Bush administration's position that the courts cannot judge the legality of the National Security Agency's (NSA's) warrantless wiretapping program, filing a motion to dismiss Jewel v. NSA late Friday.



CIA OPERATIVES WON'T BE PROSECUTED FOR TORTURE

MSNBC
Thursday, April 16, 2009
From NBC's Pete Williams and Mark Murray

A senior Justice Department official says Attorney General Eric Holder has concluded that CIA operatives who followed the legal guidance they were given will not be prosecuted, even if they used harsh interrogation methods.

If they acted "in good faith and in conformance" to the instructions they had, those officers will not face prosecution for administering even waterboarding and other methods that have since been disavowed.



Obama Follows Bush Policy on Detainee Access to Courts

By R. Jeffrey Smith
Washington Post
Saturday, April 11, 2009

The Obama administration yesterday appealed a judge's decision granting three detainees at a U.S. military prison in Afghanistan the right to challenge their detention in U.S. courts, arguing partly that compliance would inhibit the future capture of Pakistani citizens for detention by U.S. forces in Afghanistan.

The appeal makes clear that, despite the ruling this month by U.S. District Judge John D. Bates, the Obama administration for now wants to stick with a policy set by President George W. Bush that those incarcerated by U.S. troops in foreign prisons have no U.S. legal rights.


Is Obama's War Strategy a Betrayal?

CommonDreams
March 1, 2009

At first, Obama argued that U.S. involvement in the war would end quickly after he became president. As the campaign wore on that urgency migrated to getting the troops out in 16 months.

On Friday, President Obama finally made it official. United States troops will be out of Iraq by the end of 2011 - the timetable worked out with the Iraqi government under former President George Bush.

But what of the 16-month timetable?

The newest version of the Obama plan - on its face - has the United States withdrawing combat troops in 19 months. However, his plan calls for leaving upward of 50,000 of the current 142,000 troops in support positions. This smaller number is carefully being referred to by those in the administration as anything but advisers, a term made politically incorrect by the Vietnam War.

And what if the war goes badly between now and 19 months down the road?

According to statements coming out of the White House, it appears all bets could be off for withdrawing United States troops.

So what did the anti-war movement get with their "agent of change," President Barack Obama?

Little or nothing, it would appear.

Obama has, for all practical purposes, signed onto the Bush Doctrine in Iraq.

But Obama's betrayal doesn't end there.

Obama isn't really bringing troops home. He is moving the numbers to Afghanistan.

[...]

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

GOP Negro Chairman Michael Steele agrees with DL Hughley's comment that 2008 GOP convention "looked like Nazi Germany"



Hughley confronted Steele on the Republican’s implementation of their big tent philosophy.

“Well, Michael, I agree. I’m telling you, if it were the sign alone — in other words, the tenets of the Republican Party are amazing and they seem warm and welcome. But when I watch it be applied — like you didn’t have to go much further than the Republican National Convention.”

“Agreed,” replied Steele.

“It literally look like Nazi Germany. It literally did. I make that point, not only are we not welcome — not only are we not welcome, but they don’t even care what we think,” explained Hughley.

Steele nodded his head as Hughley compared the GOP to the Nazi Party, and then said “You’re right.”


Related:

Jewish-controlled Republican party taking a hard turn to the left - Opportunity for white conservatives to form new opposition party

Jews at The Weekly Standard declare conservative movement "dead", spew hatred at whites, usher in kosher khanservative movement

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Satanic Jewish-controlled UK government: 'Don't teach children right and wrong about sex'

Parents should NOT tell their children what is 'right or wrong' about having sex, say ministers

The Daily Mail | By Steve Doughty | 23rd February 2009

Parents should not tell their young teenage children that it is wrong to have sex, ministers said yesterday.

They should curb their tongues for fear of discouraging youngsters from 'being open', according to a campaign to involve mothers and fathers in sex education.

But, while parents are warned against giving moral guidance, they are encouraged to get their children to use condoms and other contraception from the age of 13.

They should offer to go with their teenagers to their GP or a sex advice clinic to get contraceptives, the advice recommended.

Critics said the advice was misguided and would marginalise the role of parents.

Children's Minister Beverley Hughes said parents should assist teenage children if they are sexually active. 'We want parents to help young people to resist the pressure to have early sex, but also to explain the importance of using contraception if and when they do decide to have sex,' she said.

Officials at the Department for Children, Schools and Families said the minister's advice applies to parents whose children are 13 - three years under the legal age of consent.

The effort to recruit parents to reinforce the Government's failing 'teenage pregnancy strategy' comes as ministers are braced for the release of damning figures on pregnancies among under-18s.

They will show - as disclosed by the Daily Mail in December - that in 2007 the teen pregnancy rate defied Government expectations by going up, not down.


[...]

Sunday, February 15, 2009

Jewish propagandist rag Newsweek: "We are all Socialists Now", New era of big government is here to stay

"We will have our communist world dictatorship whether you like it or not." --Organized Jewry


ABOVE: cover of the latest edition of Newsweek magazine

"Whether we like it or not—or even whether many people have thought much about it or not—the numbers clearly suggest that we are headed in a more European direction. A decade ago U.S. government spending was 34.3 percent of GDP, compared with 48.2 percent in the euro zone—a roughly 14-point gap, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. In 2010 U.S. spending is expected to be 39.9 percent of GDP, compared with 47.1 percent in the euro zone—a gap of less than 8 points. As entitlement spending rises over the next decade, we will become even more French."


Full Article

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

Jewish-controlled Republican party taking a hard turn to the left - Opportunity for white conservatives to form new opposition party



The GOP has already stabbed conservatives in the back on illegal immigration, big government, civil liberties, and government spending, among other issues. Now they are pandering to non-white 'minorities', and getting soft on issues like "affirmative action", abortion, and the homosexual agenda. About all that's left now is for the party to come out against the Second Amendment and gun rights.

In a way, this is good. The increasingly left turn by the GOP may be the kick in the ass to finally wake up the mass of average "unawakened" white conservatives to the fact that our government and the two major parties are controlled by the same elite Jewish interests.

GOP reaches out to blacks, Hispanics, homos and abortionists

James Edwards
Feb. 3, 2009

Just as I figured they would, the Republicans picked a black man, Michael Steele, to head up their party for the next few years. There wasn’t a chance in hell that they were going to give the job to a white man. The supporters of the GOP are overwhelmingly white, but white people are vile and disgusting in the eyes of the mainstream media, and the GOP is a lot more concerned with pleasing the mainstream media than they are with pleasing their supporters or winning elections. So the GOP goes out of its way to pick party leaders from the groups that want absolutely nothing to do with the Republican party. No white men need apply. Before Steele got the job, the chairman was a Latino, Mel Martinez. Did having Martinez as RNC chairman win any Latino votes for the GOP? No. Before Martinez, it was the homosexual Jew Ken Mehlman. Did homosexuals become any more Republican after having one of their own heading up the RNC? No, they simply ridiculed the GOP for opposing gay rights in order to pander to the Christians while the party was headed up by a homo. And how did McCain-Palin do among Jews last November? About as well as Hamas would do in an Israeli election.

Now they’ve got a black man heading up their party, just like the Democrats do, and the GOP couldn’t be happier. It simply wouldn’t do to have a white chairman. Not with a black man in the White House heading up the Democrats. If Hillary had won the nomination and the White House, no doubt a woman would have been selected as chairman. And if Obama were to suddenly announce that he’s gay, Steele would be forced out so Uncle Tom Aunt Jemima Armstrong Williams could take his place.

So the GOP is clearly going to keep on trying to outpander the Democrats. Will it work? No. Blacks, Jews, gays, Hispanics and Asians will continue to vote for the Democrats. The GOP’s white conservative base will be increasingly disgusted with the party, and more of them will just stay home as they see the party constantly moving further to the left. And anytime any group “reaches out to minorities”, they do it by moving left. And Steele is already announcing that in addition to blacks and Hispanics, he wants the GOP to aggressively pursue the votes of homosexuals and the pro-abortion crowd. From FOX News this past Sunday:

WALLACE: You are one of the co-founders of something called the Republican Leadership Council which supports candidates who favor abortion and gay rights.

STEELE: Yes.

WALLACE: Does the GOP needs to do a better job of reaching out to people who hold those views?

STEELE: I think — I think that’s an important opportunity for us, absolutely. Within our party we do have those who have that view as well as outside and my partnership with Christy Todd Whitman was an effort to build a bridge between moderates and conservatives.


Related:

Jews at The Weekly Standard declare conservative movement "dead", spew hatred at whites, usher in kosher khanservative movement

Friday, January 30, 2009

South Africa’s deputy foreign minister: "Jews control America and most western countries"

source: Chicago Sun-Times
'Jewish money' controls U.S.: African diplomat January 29, 2009FROM AFP Johannesburg - South Africa’s deputy foreign minister has been taken before the national human rights body for allegedly saying that "Jewish money" controls the United States, officials said Thursday.Fatima Hajaig allegedly told a political rally two weeks ago in Johannesburg that Jews "control America, no matter which government comes into power, whether Republican or Democratic, whether Barack Obama or George Bush." "Their control of America, just like the control of most western countries, is in the hands of Jewish money," she allegedly said.Outraged by the remarks, the South African Jewish Board of Deputies — a civil rights group — said it filed a complaint Wednesday against Hajaig at the human rights commission. "We submitted yesterday our formal complaint on the minister’s outrageous statement to the South African Human Rights Commission," the head of the group, Zev Krengel, told AFP. "That minister’s statement is incorrect, inflammatory and outrageous. We feel in our young democracy and in the 21st century, we should learn to respect each other and refrain from such anti-Semitic statements," Krengel said. The rights commission’s spokesman Vincent Moaga confirmed that the body had received the complaint, but could not give a timeline for processing it. Foreign affairs spokesman Ronnie Mamoepa declined to give details on the case, but told AFP that the South African government "has committed itself to fighting against all forms of racism, in all their ramifications, including anti-Semitism."

Thursday, December 25, 2008

Current German government dissolved in 1990 & illegal - No peace treaty signed to officially end WWII - Germany still under Allied-Jewish martial law

American Free Press: Germany exists in juridical limboGood Morning from the Zundelsite:For those who are interested in the apparent legal limbo in Germany, where impostors posing as judges, state prosecutors and so on - at least so it seems! - hold my kidnapped husband and two other writers of note in detention, here is some additional information dug up by a journalist of the American Free Press:Germany: 58 Years of US OccupationChristopher BollynPOTSDAM, Germany - The Allied occupation of Germany began 58 years ago this month and in the eyes of many Germans has not yet ended. Foreign armies are still based on German soil and Europe’s largest and most prosperous “democracy” still lacks a constitution and a peace treaty putting a formal end to the Second World War.The reunified German nation, considered a modern European democracy, has no constitution other than the temporary Basic Law (Grundgesetz) originally written in 1948, under the guidance of the U.S. military occupation forces and originally meant only to apply to the western parts of Germany under U.S. control.The Basic Law was removed at the request of former Secretary of State James Baker at a Paris conference of the Allied powers and the two former German states on July 17, 1990. The two German states were legally abolished at this conference. As a result of these changes, the Basic Law does not legally apply to the reunified German state, according to some legal experts.In any case, the Basic Law is incomplete and contradictory and article 139 states that the numerous Allied occupation laws and proclamations remain in effect. The Basic Law has never been ratified by a vote of the people.The fact that the flawed and temporary Basic Law serves as Germany’s de facto constitution is unacceptable to Wolfgang Gerhard Günter Ebel, Germany’s provisional Reichskanzler. Ebel heads the provisional government that claims to be the legal successor to the Second German Reich, which was replaced by Adolf Hitler’s illegal Third Reich (1933-45).On 5 June 1945, the Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Force (SHAEF) accepted Germany’s declaration of defeat and quickly moved to recognize the legitimacy of the Zweite Deutsche Reich (Second German Reich), which was claimed to have been illegally displaced by Hitler’s Third Reich.The SHAEF laws underpinned a treaty between the occupation authorities and the Second German Reich, in which the latter was invested with full administrative rights and governmental sovereignty throughout most of Berlin and in all of the German states. After WWII ended, a parallel state, founded by ambitious lawyers and Zionist activists and still known as the Federal Republic of Germany (BRD), competed with the Second German Reich for legitimacy.Following the collapse of the DDR, East Germany’s Democratic Republic, a treaty known as the “2 Plus 4″ confirmed that only the Second German Reich, now led by Reichskanzler (Prime Minister) Dr Wolfgang Gerhard Guenter Ebel, represented the legitimate German State. In July 1990, the Secretary of the US Department of State, James Baker, confirmed in writing to German Chancellor Helmut Kohl that the BRD had come to the end of its lifetime and should be dissolved. From that moment on, the United Nations destroyed all of its stationery and placards that carried the words “Federal Republic of Germany” or BRD and replaced them with use of the broader term “Germany” in lieu of the anticipated “German Reich”.Almost everyone in diplomatic circles around the world expected the re-emergent German Reich to take over where the BRD had left off. Yet the government in Bonn, and later in Berlin, continued and still continues to act and behave as if nothing really happened: a sort of disembodied ghost that has no idea that its corpse perished many years ago.Despite this highly unusual situation, the Second German Reich continues to issue its own passports and driving licenses. Over the last two or three years there has been a sharp increase in the number of motorists who have been acquitted for speeding or parking offences, simply on the strength of their having produced a German Reich driving license.The illegal German government in Berlin is so worried about the publicity, it has leaned heavily on newspapers not to report on such matters and it has instructed judges to dismiss cases where a defendant is likely to prove that his citizenship of the German Reich permits him not to recognize the BRD and its courts as legitimate administrative constructs. They are horrified at the publicity each of these cases brings.Right now, “Germany rests on the 2nd Reich” and on the constitution of the Weimar Republic created on August 11, 1919, Wolfgang Gerhard Günter Ebel told AFP. This is the only legal constitution for Germany, according to Ebel, until a peace treaty is signed. According to the provisional government, the Final Settlement of Sept. 12, 1990 is not valid because it was negotiated and signed by the foreign ministers of the two German states, the BRD and the DDR, both of which legally ceased to exist after the Paris conference of July 17, 1990.“The German government is illegal,” Ebel told AFP, “and what they do has no basis in law.” Asked how it could be that the German people are unaware of this situation, Ebel said: “The German media is still under the control of the Allies. The entire media is controlled.“The Second World War has not ended, because a peace treaty has not been signed between Germany and the Allies,” ” Ebel says, “The peace contract is the most important thing that we need and want.” Because there is no formal peace treaty between Germany and the Allies, headed by the United States, German sovereignty is compromised. “Until we have a peace treaty, Germany is a colony of the United States.”Some 80,000 U.S. military personnel are permanently based in Germany and Britain also continues to base troops and military equipment in the western German zone they formerly occupied. It is not uncommon to see British tanks on the streets of the area near Münster in Westphalia.U.S. occupation laws handed down by the Supreme Headquarter Allied Expeditionary Force (SHAEF) are still in effect, Ebel said. The first law, Proclamation No. 1, making General Dwight D. Eisenhower supreme authority in the areas under U.S. control was signed on Feb. 13, 1944. Allied authorities have informed Ebel that these SHAEF laws will remain in effect for 60 years from the date of signing and apply to all of Europe.Calls to the U.S. State Department in Washington and the U.S. Embassy in Berlin concerning the validity of SHAEF laws and U.S. occupation proclamations in Germany were not returned.“When there is a peace treaty - when the wound is healed - many things will change,” Ebel says, “not only for Germany, but for the whole world.“The United Nations is also provisional - if there is a peace treaty between Germany and the Allies [primarily the United States] - the UN will cease to exist as we know it,” Ebel said. The UN organization was founded in 1945 and originated with the 26 nations that had joined the anti-Nazi coalition in 1942. By 1944 the coalition had grown to include 47 nations.The UN Charter contains “enemy state clauses” [Articles 53 and 107], which were established because of Germany and name it as the “enemy state.”“The Bundesrepublik Deutschland, (the former West German state), is not the legal successor or inheritor of the Second German Reich,” according to Ebel. For this reason, a legal peace treaty cannot be signed by the current German government in Berlin, he said.“Until the real government is established and voted by the people,” Ebel said, the provisional government is necessary to “fulfill the role of the legal German government.”The Allies have authorized Ebel to serve as head of the provisional government, he says. A civil servant with the German railroad, Ebel was born in Berlin in 1939 and is a citizen of the German Reich, having never held citizenship of either German state that resulted from the Second World War. Berlin was a separate zone and “has never been part of the BRD or DDR,” Ebel said.Ebel was first appointed by the U.S. Military Court in Berlin to serve as Rechtskonsulent for Prussia on Sept. 23, 1980.On Jan. 9, 1984, the U.S. State Department in Berlin appointed Ebel to serve as the head of the German railroad (Reichsbahn) in West Berlin.Exactly forty years after the German military (Wehrmacht) surrendered, on May 8, 1985, Ebel was appointed as Transportation Minister for the German Reich by the U.S. High Commissioner in Germany, who he says was then U.S. Ambassador to West Germany (BRD) Richard Burt.Finally, on Sept. 27, 2000, Ebel was appointed chancellor of the German Reich (Reichskanzler) by Ernst Matscheko, a representative of the U.S. Dept. of Justice. Matscheko reportedly asked Ebel to name a Reichspräsident and a special ambassador to the United Nations.[END]The U.S. Embassy in Berlin will neither confirm nor deny the claims made by Ebel, for which he presents documents as evidence. A spokesman at the U.S. Embassy told AFP: “We are not responsible for what they [the Reich's government] claim.”

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Jews at <em>The Weekly Standard</em> declare conservative movement "dead", spew hatred at whites, usher in kosher khanservative movement

"Go f*&# yourself white cracka trash! Hope you like the new marxist GOP!"The Jews behind The Weekly Standard hijacked the American conservative movement and the Republican party long ago. In years past they could not alter the staunch conservative views of the movement, and thus focused on working behind the scenes to neutralize and thwart the effectiveness of the movement. But following the marxist take-over of the 2008 election, they are now working to effectively kill a real conservative movement in America by moving it to the left and transforming it into a more liberal and politically correct pseudo-conservative movement, such as the "conservative" political parties in Europe. These kosher khanservatives will be soft on illegal immigration and abortion, more willing to submit to erosion of gun ownership rights, open to allowing "gay marriage", less fundamentalist Christian in nature, willing to concede to the "necessity" of big government, etc.http://weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/791jsebl.asp?pg=1
We Blew ItA look back in remorse on the conservative opportunity that was squandered.by P.J. O'Rourke 11/17/2008Let us bend over and kiss our ass goodbye. Our 28-year conservative opportunity to fix the moral and practical boundaries of government is gone--gone with the bear market and the Bear Stearns and the bear that's headed off to do you-know-what in the woods on our philosophy.[...]...conservatism, if it is ever reborn, will not come again in the lifetime of anyone old enough to be rounded up by ACORN and shipped to the polling booths.[...]Since then modern conservatism has been plagued by the wrong friends and the wrong foes....There was no need to piss off the entire black population of America to get Dixie's electoral votes. And despising cracker trash who have a laundry hamper full of bedsheets with eye-holes cut in them does not make a man a liberal.[...]We have all of this going for us, worldwide. And yet we chose to deliver our sermons only to the faithful or the already converted. Of course the trailer park Protestants yell "Amen." If you were handling rattlesnakes and keeping dinosaurs for pets, would you vote for the party that gets money from PETA?[...]In how many ways did we fail conservatism? And who can count that high? Take just one example of our unconserved tendency to poke our noses into other people's business: abortion....If the citizenry insists that abortion remain legal--and, in a passive and conflicted way, the citizenry seems to be doing so--then give the issue a rest. [...]Our attitude toward immigration has been repulsive. Are we not pro-life? Are not immigrants alive? Unfortunately, no, a lot of them aren't after attempting to cross our borders. Conservative immigration policies are as stupid as conservative attitudes are gross. Fence the border and give a huge boost to the Mexican ladder industry. Put the National Guard on the Rio Grande and know that U.S. troops are standing between you and yard care.

Monday, November 10, 2008

Obama's Five Candidates For Treasury Secretary Are All Jews - Surely A "Coincidence"

http://www.natallnews.com/Posted by Robert Ransdell 2008-11-08 Mere coincidence you ask? One might be surprised that the media or Obama's handlers has not thrown in a non-Jewish candidate just so things wouldn't be so obvious. Many foolish people think Obama will bring meaningful change to the country. Well Henry Paulson, the current Treasury Secretary who just manipulated the bailout swindle a few weeks ago, is a Jew. Now let's look at the candidates that are in the running to be his successor under Obama.JEW #1 Jon Corzine - Is the Jewish Governor of New Jersey. Corzine, also a former Senator, formerly was chief of Jewish banking giant Goldman, Sachs & Co. Article linked below refers to Corzine as a prime candidate for the position of Treasury Secretary and also mentions several others that will be discussed here.Jew #2 Paul Volcker - Was Chairman of the Federal Reserve from 1979 to 1987. Excuse us Negroid President Obama, but doesn't the word "change" mean to do things differently than from times in the past? Before his time as Federal Reserve Chairman Volcker was a leader within Jewish banking giant Chase Manhattan. In 1971 this Jew played an important role in the decision to suspend gold convertibility which lead to the collapse of the Bretton Woods system. We advise readers to click on the links to "gold convertibility" and "Bretton Woods system" that are linked on the Wikipedia biography of Volcker and you will see that this Jew was instrumental in fundementally changing the monetary system of this country and the world. Certainly Volcker is not one of the chosen that is hard to spot out, even for the untrained eye, viewing his picture on Wikipedia will make it clear to you that he is one of those Jews that you could identify in a dark room.Jew #3 Tim Geithner - This Jew is the current president of the Federal Reserve itself. Well known in Jewish banking circles, Geithner has worked within the International Monetary Fund as well as within the U.S. Treasury Department itself and has served under both Jews listed below.Jew #4 Robert Rubin - Rubin, if selected, would be another example of the fact that Obama has a very odd way of defining the word change. Rubin was the Jew who served as the Secretary of the Treasury under Bill Clinton during both of his terms. Critics, most of whom would be too timid to point out that he is a Jew, have said that Rubin created the conditions that have resulted in the current financial crisis. This Jew has spent his lifetime working for several big Jewish banking giants such as Citigroup and Goldman-Sachs as well as spending time within various positions in the New York Stock Exchange, New York Futures Exchange, as well as the Harvard Corporation.Jew #5 Larry Summers - Summers is a familiar face, not a change here either Mr. Obama, as he served as U.S. Treasury Secretary under Clinton during the last half of his 2nd term and was preceded by Rubin. Summers was the first Jewish president of Harvard University. Summers was forced to resign after making comments that irked women's groups in the winter of 2005. Summers lead a campaign in 2002 at Harvard which focused on silencing critics of Israel among the faculty of Harvard and MIT who encouraged that those schools divest from companies with Israeli holdings. This Jew is a hardcore globalist who has also spent time as the Chief Economist for the World Bank. Earlier this year Summers was honored at the YIVO Institute for Jewish research in,where else, New York City, for, according to the article linked below, "his unique mastery of scholarship and public policy, and the interplay of economic policy and world events in both the micro and macro spheres." Wow, what a fancy schmancy way to basically say that the guy is a real Jew's Jew when it comes to fleecing the goy sheep for all they are worth.Information on the Jews listed above as well as articles used as reference for this short report are linked below.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/05/obama-under-pressure-to-p_n_141310.htmlhttp://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2008/11/mr_corzine_goes_to_washington.phphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Volckerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tim_Geithnerhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Summers#Differences_between_the_sexeshttp://www.yivoinstitute.org/index.php?tid=154&aid=490

Lebanese Journalist Hassan Hamadah: 'Rahm Emanuel Is A Mossad Agent'

Sunday, November 9, 2008

"Change"? - Obama selects orthodox Jew, fanatical Israel-firster, warmonger, and son of a Zionist terrorist Rahm Emanuel as chief of staff

http://euronews.us/?p=850#more-85007 Nov 2008EURONEWS.US, Derek Bargeld – Americans are mostly still in the dark when it comes to understanding American politics and the fraud that is our government. The worst part is that the answers are out in the open for those who are able to think independently and evaluate what is going on. However, as long as the media still keeps the minds of Americans in the dark, they will not awaken.Yesterday, we saw President-Elect Obama make his first selection for his cabinet. The first selection by a president-elect should show to whom he owes his allegiance. Who does he wish to thank for his presidency? Obama chose Rahm Emanuel. This is a strikingly odd choice for someone who wishes to change the American way of governing and international relations.Emanuel is a Jewish extremist who has pushed for continuing war in the Middle East until all arab nations are changed into American Democracies. This is the policy that led Bush from a 90% approval rating down to a 20% approval rating and being commonly regarded as one of the worst presidents in history.Emanuel’s family history shows that his father was part of a Jewish terrorist group who fought the British in Palestine [the "Irgun"] . In an interview with Ma’ariv, Emanuel’s father said, “Obviously he will influence the president to be pro-Israel. Why wouldn’t he be? What is he, an Arab? He’s not going to clean the floors of the White House.”Emanuel recently wrote a book which outlines his extreme support for Israel and plan for America to bring more troops to the Middle East. Here is what one reviewer on Amazon wrote:
It is amusing to have Rahm Emmanual write a book on saving the United States, when his first allegiance is to Israel. He is a proponent of the neo-con plan to reconfigure the Middle East, including attacking Iran (or, as Hillary Clinton, his partner in crime, would say, “Obliterate Iran”). He supports attacks on Syria, Lebanon, the continued occupation of Iraq, the refusal to allow a viable Palestinian state to exist, and the impending attack on Iran: all for the “survival” of Israel.In the process, America is weakened, open to more extremist attacks, and its men and women are dying or losing limbs.Rahm is an orthodox Jew, his parents are citizens of Israel: All of which would be fine if they didn’t use America as a puppet for Israel’s ultimate super power status in the Middle East.Rahm is a traitor. He will sell — and is selling out — our country for Israel.