The reason for the Iraq War

March 20, 2003 - The war now dubbed "Operation Iraqi Freedom" begins

7+ years, at the cost of $750 billion, and the lives of 4,400+ Americans and tens of thousands of Iraqis

Fighting and Dying In Iraq, but for what?

No, Virginia, it is not about WMDs

Nor is it about "liberating" the Iraqi people from Saddam Hussein and "spreading freedom and democracy" to Iraq

The Truth



War planned years in advance by Jewish 'Neo-Cons'

The "neo-conservative" think tank Project for a New American Century (PNAC), founded and consisting predominantly of Zionist Jews including many dual Israeli-US citizens, planned a war against Iraq as early as 2000, citing the need for US Military control of the Gulf region. The PNAC reports were based upon earlier Israeli defense strategy papers authored by future PNAC members Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, and David Wurmser. [1] [2]










Lies about "threat of WMDs" fabricated as pretext for war

" Seven months before the invasion of Iraq, the head of British foreign intelligence reported to Prime Minister Tony Blair that President Bush wanted to topple Saddam Hussein by military action and warned that in Washington intelligence was "being fixed around the policy," according to notes of a July 23, 2002, meeting with Blair at No. 10 Downing Street. " [3]











Niger Yellowcake Forgery

To support the claim that Iraq was seeking weapons of mass destruction, the Bush administration used foreign 'intelligence' alleging Iraq had tried to purchase nuclear material from Niger. This 'intelligence' was completely fabricated, and the State Department and CIA even knew it was false at the time. [4]











A Massive Hoax on the American People and the World

February 5, 2003 - Then Secretary of State Colin Powell addressed the United Nations Security Council on the urgent need to wage war against Iraq, citing the Niger Yellowcake forgery as "indisputable" evidence that Iraq was developing nuclear weapons.

Powell's Former Chief of Staff Lawrence Wilkerson later admitted this pre-war 'intelligence' was "a hoax on the American people." [5]










Israel aided US and Britain in fraudulent 'intelligence' in push for war

Brigadier-General Shlomo Brom, former deputy commander of the Israeli military's planning division, admitted in a report by an Israeli military research center that Israeli intelligence services and political leaders were a 'full partner' and provided "an exaggerated assessment of Iraqi capabilities", raising "the possibility that the intelligence picture was manipulated." [6]











Iraq Was Not a Threat to the United States, but rather to the Jewish State of 'Israel'

Jewish Neo-con and at the time member of the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, Philip Zelikow, stated in a speech months before the war:

"Why would Iraq attack America or use nuclear weapons against us? I'll tell you what I think the real threat [is] and actually has been since 1990 - it's the threat against Israel...And this is the threat that dare not speak its name, because the Europeans don't care deeply about that threat, I will tell you frankly. And the American government doesn't want to lean too hard on it rhetorically, because it is not a popular sell." [7]










A U.S. Congressman dares to tell the truth

At a March 3rd, 2003 antiwar forum in Reston, Virginia, outside Washington, Congressman Rep. Jim Moran, D-Virginia, said "If it were not for the strong support of the Jewish community for this war with Iraq, we would not be doing this." [8]











Israeli Jews Openly Acknowledge Jews Were Driving Force Behind the War

Israeli journalist Ari Shavit admits, "The war in Iraq was conceived by 25 neoconservative intellectuals, most of them Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of history." [9]











Ariel Sharon: "We, the Jewish people control America"

Israel Radio (Kol Yisrael) reported on Oct. 3, 2001, that Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, had boasted at a Cabinet meeting, "I want to tell you something very clear, don't worry about American pressure on Israel, we, the Jewish people control America, and the Americans know it."











Is Iran Next?

Israeli politicians, Jewish neo-cons, and zionist lapdogs are now urging the United States to attack Iran, using the same tactic of squealing about "nukes" and "WMDs". [10]

Retired general Wesley Clark even admitted that "New York Money People" are driving the U.S. to war with Iran. [11]

Summary

The nation of Iraq was a threat to the Jewish State, and an obstacle to the plans of International Jewry for their planned "New World Order." The 'rogue' Iraqi people were not integrating into the globalist new international order, without a central bank controlled by the Rothschild/Jewish banking cabal. Control of Iraq's vast oil reserves is a bonus. The Zionist Jews who control the U.S. government used the might of the U.S. Military to advance the agenda.

Sources:

[1] "Bush Planned Iraq 'Regime Change' Before Becoming President" (The Sunday Herald)
[2] Iraq: A War For Israel By Mark Weber
[3] "British Intelligence Warned of Iraq War" (Washington Post)
[4] "Niger uranium forgeries" (wikipedia)
[5] Colin Powell's Former Chief Of Staff Wilkerson Calls Pre-War Intelligence A 'Hoax On The American People' (PBS)
[6] "Israel linked to Iraq intelligence failure, general says" (Washington Post)
[7] "Iraq was invaded 'to protect Israel' - US official" (Asia Times)
[8] "Lawmaker under fire for saying Jews support Iraq war" (CNN)
[9] "White man's burden" (Haaretz)
[10] "Israel Prodding U.S. To Attack Iran" (CBS)
[11] "Top Dem Wesley Clark Says ‘N.Y. Money People’ Pushing War With Iran" (Forward)









Other Articles of Interest:

- The War in Afghanistan is about the Jewish controlled Heroin Industry
- "Cover Up In Oklahoma" - The 1995 Bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City an Obvious False Flag
- 1946 King David Hotel Bombing - Zionist 'Israel' the Founding Fathers of Modern Terrorism
- An introduction to 'The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion' - Blueprint for Jewish World Conquest
- The Horror of Anti-Semitism - Why Do People Hate the Jews?
- More proof that the Jews started WWII - Testimony from distinguished diplomats
- New book by military historian Robert Wilcox documents the assassination of General George Patton

Anti-semitic moment on C-SPAN with ex-CIA analyst Michael Scheuer

CALLER "John" from Franklin, New York: "Good morning. I for one am sick and tired of all these Jews coming on C-SPAN and other stations, and pushing us to go to war against our Muslim friends.

They're willing to spend the last drop of American blood and treasure to get their way in the world. They have way too much power in this country. People like Wolfowitz and Feith and the other neocons that Jew'd us into Iraq...and now we're going to spend the next sixty years rehabilitating our soldiers. I'm sick and tired of it."

Michael Scheurer: "I think that American foreign policy is eventually up to the American people. One of the big things we have not been able to discuss in this country for the last thirty years is our policy towards the Israelis.

Whether we want to be involved in fighting Israel's wars in the future is something that Americans should be able to talk about. They may vote yes. They may want to see their kids to be killed in Iraq or Yemen or somewhere else to protect Israel, but the question is, we need to talk about it. Ultimately, Israel is a country of no particular worth to the United States, strategically, they have no resources we need, their manpower is minimal, their association with us is a negative for the United States - now that's a fact. What you're going to do about that fact is entirely different; but for anyone to stand up in the United States and say that our support for Israel doesn't hurt us in the Muslim world, or our support for Hosni Mubarack's dictatorship doesn't hurt us, is just to defy reality."

Scheuer on the power and influence of the Jewish lobby on the US Government:

Michael Scheuer entered into the controversy surrounding the Mearsheimer and Walt paper on the "Israel Lobby". He said to NPR that Mearsheimer and Walt are basically right. Israel, according to Scheuer, has engaged in one of the most successful campaigns to influence public opinion in the United States ever conducted by a foreign government. Scheuer said to NPR that "They [Mearsheimer and Walt] should be credited for the courage they have had to actually present a paper on the subject. [1]

Flashback: Jewish-Zionist control of U.S. Government confirmed by preeminent political scholars John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt

Flashback - Obama: "The first thing I will do as President is get our troops home. Take that to the bank."

"I promise you this, that if we have not gotten our troops out by the time I am president, it is the first thing I will do. I will get our troops home. We will bring an end to this war. You can take that to the bank. " - Barack Obama Campaign Promise - October 27, 2007

Under puppet Obama, the fraudulent "War on Terror" to be renamed "'Overseas Contingency Operations"

'Global War On Terror' Is Given New Name

Bush's Phrase Is Out, Pentagon Says

By Scott Wilson and Al Kamen | Washington Post Staff Writers | March 25, 2009

The Obama administration appears to be backing away from the phrase "global war on terror," a signature rhetorical legacy of its predecessor.

In a memo e-mailed this week to Pentagon staff members, the Defense Department's office of security review noted that "this administration prefers to avoid using the term 'Long War' or 'Global War on Terror' [GWOT.] Please use 'Overseas Contingency Operation.' "

The memo said the direction came from the Office of Management and Budget, the executive-branch agency that reviews the public testimony of administration officials before it is delivered.

Not so, said Kenneth Baer, an OMB spokesman.

"There was no memo, no guidance," Baer said yesterday. "This is the opinion of a career civil servant."

Coincidentally or not, senior administration officials had been publicly using the phrase "overseas contingency operations" in a war context for roughly a month before the e-mail was sent.

[...]

Shocker: Despite Obama’s Vow, Combat Brigades Will Stay in Iraq Past 2010

POLITICS: Despite Obama’s Vow, Combat Brigades Will Stay in Iraq

By Gareth Porter

WASHINGTON, Mar 25 (IPS) - Despite President Barack Obama’s statement at Camp LeJeune, North Carolina Feb. 27 that he had "chosen a timeline that will remove our combat brigades over the next 18 months," a number of Brigade Combat Teams (BCTs), which have been the basic U.S. Army combat unit in Iraq for six years, will remain in Iraq after that date under a new non-combat label.

A spokesman for Defence Secretary Robert M. Gates, Lt. Col. Patrick S. Ryder, told IPS Tuesday that "several advisory and assistance brigades" would be part of a U.S. command in Iraq that will be "re-designated" as a "transition force headquarters" after August 2010.

But the "advisory and assistance brigades" to remain in Iraq after that date will in fact be the same as BCTs, except for the addition of a few dozen officers who would carry out the advice and assistance missions, according to military officials involved in the planning process.

Gates has hinted that the withdrawal of combat brigades will be accomplished through an administrative sleight of hand rather than by actually withdrawing all the combat brigade teams. Appearing on Meet the Press Mar. 1, Gates said the "transition force" would have "a very different kind of mission", and that the units remaining in Iraq "will be characterised differently".

"They will be called advisory and assistance brigades," said Gates. "They won't be called combat brigades."

Obama’s decision to go along with the military proposal for a "transition force" of 35,000 to 50,000 troops thus represents a complete abandonment of his own original policy of combat troop withdrawal and an acceptance of what the military wanted all along - the continued presence of several combat brigades in Iraq well beyond mid-2010.

[...]

"Devout Jew" Indicted as part of Network Supplying IED Components to Iraq/Iran

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article4882624.eceBritons accused over roadside bomb networkThe Sunday TimesOctober 5, 2008Two Iranian-born British men are accused of being part of a network supplying components for the roadside bombs which are killing coalition soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. The network, uncovered by American investigators, is alleged to have illegally shipped more than 30,000 electronic components from the United States to Iran via other countries. The components are said to be identical to those used in some of the hidden bombs which have killed 2,000 coalition soldiers, including more than 200 British servicemen. One of the accused is Farshid Gillardian, a 39-year-old whose family was given refuge in Britain after the 1979 Iranian revolution. He was arrested in his mother’s north London home two weeks ago. His fellow accused, Ali Akbar Yahya, a 48-year-old businessman, disappeared from his flat in Dubai last month and neighbours say they know nothing of his whereabouts. Both men are named in a 45-page United States grand jury indictment which draws on a three-year investigation into the smuggling of dual-use components. It is understood the inquiries were prompted by the discovery of American-made electronics in an unexploded roadside bomb in Iraq. The US authorities allege the British nationals are part of a network which breached export rules and embargoes to supply this type of equipment to Iran. Officials say the Iranians have supplied the components for many of the Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) used against coalition troops. Mario Mancuso, the US undersecretary of commerce for industry and security, described the network as a “lethal international ring seeking to harm American and allied forces . . . by acquiring sensitive US technology capable of producing IEDs similar to those being used in Iraq and Afghanistan”. This weekend Gillardian’s friends and family described the allegations as “preposterous”. Karen Todner, his lawyer, said: “This man is no terrorist. As a devout Jew he is horrified he has been linked with Islamic terror in Iraq or Afghanistan. He categorically denies these charges.” [...]

Joe Biden: Bush and Cheney Were Right!

More material for McCain campaign spots.

News Not Fit To Print

Considering how much opinion finds its way onto the front page, perhaps a little room should be made for news on the opinion page. There have been a number of interesting stories in these last few weeks that have not seen the prominence they deserve. In fact some have been totally ignored.


For example, you probably heard that several hostages were rescued from the so-called Revolutionary Armed Forces of Columbia (FARC) guerillas in Columbia. These cocaine smuggling terrorists have made life miserable for Columbians for years. You might also have read someplace that the FARC has suffered a number of other devastating defeats recently.

But, unless you read the Wall Street Journal, you probably have not heard that a laptop computer was recently captured and that it contained a wealth of information about the FARC and its allies. Along with revelations about FARC’s alliances with Venezuela and Ecuador, we learned that the Democratic Party was conducting back channel negotiations with the FARC.

More recent information has come to light that Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco, where else?) had a direct hand in these negotiations and had personally designated Representative James McGovern (D-Massachusetts) to represent her to the terrorists. Among the issues discussed was the recently negotiated Columbia Free Trade Agreement. The terrorists are against it. Nancy Pelosi exercised unprecedented powers to stall the treaty in the House. Coincidence?

If you doubt the authenticity of the intelligence, it should be noted that Columbia allowed Europe’s Interpol to examine the hard drive and Interpol concluded that the evidence was authentic and that the hard drive had not been tampered with.

A few years ago, the front pages were covered with the Valerie Plame affair. Valerie Plame was a CIA desk jockey who’s “cover” was blown after her husband, the execrable Joe Wilson had written a New York Times Op-Ed piece in which he claimed to have disproven President Bush’s claim that Iraq had sought to purchase high grade uranium ore from Niger. The mainstream press dutifully repeated Joe Wilson’s accusation that Karl Rove had exposed his wife and ruined her career.

Well, it turned out that Joe Wilson’s Op-Ed was directly contradicted by the report that Joe Wilson had submitted to the Bush Administration. The Iraqi trade minister had indeed visited Niger to promote trade between the two countries. And considering that uranium ore is Niger’s only export, the Niger government interpreted the visit as an attempt to purchase the raw materials for a nuclear bomb.

This is old, if not widely reported news. Even less widely reported was the recent revelation that Valerie Plame shares her husband’s reverence for the truth. When asked why the Bush Administration would have hired a flaming lefty like Wilson for such an assignment, the answer given was that, he had been recommended by his wife. She vehemently denied that publicly and under oath. A recently declassified document shows that indeed, Joe Wilson was hired after his wife’s recommendation.

You’d think that the truth would deserve as much prominence in the mainstream news as the original lies received. You’d think. But you’d be wrong.

Early last month, the New York Times briefly noted that a major military operation was getting underway in Iraq. In fact, what was happening was an Iraqi-led operation to snuff out the last remaining organized remnants of Al Qaida in Iraq. An estimated 12,000 terrorists had been surrounded and ever since their number was being ground down. The final pocket of about a thousand was essentially wiped out. Iraqi president Maliki declared the war essentially over. I didn’t learn this from reading American newspapers or watching American television news. I learned it reading the Times of London online edition.

At last check, the US had only suffered one combat death this month.
So, how did the mainstream media go about putting a negative spin on this grim milestone? They noted that combat deaths in Afghanistan had surpassed Iraqi combat deaths.

I think that I am far more likely to read about Britney Spears being seen again in public sans underwear than good news from Iraq.

Finally, the latest underreported story was the revelation that the United States has spirited 550 tons of purified uranium ore out of Iraq. Now, what would 550 tons of uranium ore be doing in Iraq? As everyone surely knows, Saddam Hussein had no plans to develop nuclear weapons. And so, he would have had no use for uranium. Surely, somebody simply misplaced it. It was probably Niger.