The Theory of Evolution Deception

Is the Theory of Evolution hard science or ridiculous nonsense?

The original motive behind Darwin's theory

Charles Darwin, a staunch opponent of slavery who once considered becoming a minister, proposed the theory in order to attempt to argue for the lie of the common descent of 'mankind'. [1] His book, On the Origin of Species, was published in 1859.












The important distinction between 'Micro evolution', i.e. adaptations within a species, vs. 'Macro evolution'

Changes in the frequency of genetic traits of a species due to "natural selection", the process by which individual organisms with beneficial traits are more likely to survive and reproduce, is logical. This we may term "micro evolution." A classic cited example is that of the peppered moth (right), in which it is claimed the light-colored moths within the species almost died off due to predation when trees were darkened with soot from pollution.

But 'Macro Evolution' -- the theory that species can transform into other species, and that all species originated from a common ancestor which spontaneously erupted from non-complex inorganic chemical matter -- is an entirely different matter.









A preposterous fairytale

Cursory consideration and objective thought destroys the theory. How is it remotely possible that 'primordial soup' can turn into infinitely complex living organisms due to nothing more than random chance and passage of time? Common sense, let alone a mathematician, will tell you the statistical odds of this happening are nil.











The fossil record does not support evolution - Where are the transitional fossils?

If evolution actually occurred, there should be millions of so-called "transitional fossils". For instance, were the theory true, there should be fossils of half wolf, half dolphin [2] and half ape, half human creatures. Yet, not a single genuine transitional fossil has ever been found. This is why there are so many "missing links."

So where is the evidence to support evolution?









Genetic mutations are harmful, not beneficial

Evolution would require the "appearance" of new genetic information out of nowhere, and constant genetic mutation for the creation of new species. Yet, genetic mutations have almost always been observed to be harmful, not beneficial. Scientists have never found an example of the addition of appreciable new and beneficial genetic information to the gene pool of a species. Yet this should be occurring all the time, with millions of examples were evolution true.












Theory of Evolution Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics

The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that disorder and decay is constantly increasing in the universe. Evolution, on the other hand, claims that the universe is constantly tending towards higher and higher order via random chance. Evolutionists still try their best to explain away this problem.










Fraudulent "Evidence"

Surely, 'eminent' and world famous "scientists" such as Jewish evolutionary "biologist" Stephen Jay Gould (right), couldn't be intentionally lying to us?

Shockingly, it turns out the minuscule purported "evidence" used to support the theory is a plethora of hoaxes and lies - including such notorious frauds as Haeckel's faked embryo drawings, Piltdown Man, and Nebraska Man.










Ernst Haeckel's faked embryo drawings

Naturalist Ernst Haeckel's embryo drawings falsified the embryos of different animals in order to promote the idea that different species were very similar in the embryonic stage of development. This of course, is purported "evidence" of the common ancestry of all organisms. These drawings are still widely used in school textbooks as "proof" of evolution.










'Piltdown Man' Hoax

In 1912, Charles Dawson, an amateur archaeologist, claimed to have found bones of a primitive hominid (a "missing link") in a quarry near Piltdown Common in Sussex, England. Piltdown Man was constructed from parts of a modern-looking skull and an apelike lower jaw.

Piltdown man was claimed to be 500,000 years old and declared "absolute proof" of evolution in museums, academia, and countless newspapers and scientific journals.

The fraud went undetected for forty years. In 1953, Piltdown was discovered to be a forgery, consisting of the lower jawbone of an orangutan that had been deliberately combined with the skull of a fully developed modern human.










'Nebraska Man' Fraud

Nebraska Man was discovered in 1922 in western Nebraska. It was hailed as the "missing link" in human evolution which allegedly lived 1 million years ago. This "evidence" was used by evolutionists in the famous Scopes evolution trial in Dayton, Tennessee, in 1925.

What exactly was this discovery? It was a single tooth, which turned out to be the tooth of an extinct species of pig.











A theory taught as if it is a fact

When 'professor' Shlomo Greenbaumstein at the local jewish-controlled university teaches that the theory of evolution is "established fact", "proven", and "beyond question", impressionable students dare not question or risk being castigated as a "nutball Creationist."









Organized Jewry and their lackeys know a useful lie when they see it

Jewry, Satan's foot soldiers, are ultimately behind the promotion of the 'secular humanist' and atheist philosophies. The theory of evolution is pontificated as 'gospel truth' in the jewish-controlled 'mainstream' media, and jewish-dominated and controlled universities and government-run 'schools'.

Protocol IX: "We have fooled, bemused and corrupted the youth of the goyim by rearing them in principles and theories which are known to us to be false although it is by us that they have been inculcated."

Protocol IV: "It is indispensable for us to undermine all faith, to tear out of the minds of the Goyim the very principle of the Godhead and the spirit and to put in its place arithmetical calculations and material needs."









Evolution is not science, but a religion

Evolution is the centerpiece of the "scientific justification" for 'secular humanist' atheism.

It takes far more "faith" to believe that the entire universe just came together by random chance than it does to believe that a Creator must exist.












Evolution shills have no use for logic, facts, truth, and free & open debate

Teaching of 'intelligent design' is verboten in the jewish-controlled indoctrination 'schools.' Only lies, frauds, and hoaxes are allowed. Real scientists and professors who question the orthodoxy find themselves out of a job. In 'scientific' circles, evolutionists prefer to promulgate more theories to support the central theory. All that matters is that they have a justification for their need to advocate a rejection of 'God'.









What's next?

In 10 million more years, will humans 'evolve' into 12-foot tall, 4-armed, purple-skinned, winged humanoids?

One of the most absurd lies in history

Real "science" is a search for the truth, and is based on logic, observation, and factual evidence. Evolutionary theory is not science, and flies in the face of logic and evidence. It is rather a labyrinth of lies, frauds, half-truths, and baseless theories concocted by ideologues out to advance an atheistic agenda. The real wonder is that so many people are duped by these charlatans.

Related Articles:

- Charles Darwin's theory of evolution not based on empirical research, but put forth to justify common descent of all humanity
- Pew Research Center Poll: 63% of Americans reject theory of evolution; 64% favor teaching creationism in public schools


Other Articles of Interest:

- The myth of the "brotherhood" of humanity; Adam not the first man, but father of only the white race
- The Roots of 'Anti-Semitism' - Why Do People Hate the Jews?
- Racial origin of the "Jews"; not Israelites, but descendants of Khazars, Edomites, Canaanites, Cain, and ultimately Satan
- An introduction to 'The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion' - Blueprint for Jewish World Conquest
- Bible does not say that Earth is only 6,000 years old, only that Adam & Eve created 6,000 years ago - Life existed in previous ages, then destroyed
- The Flood of Noah Was Not Worldwide

KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov explains the Communist strategy for subversion of Western Society

Excerpts:

Bezmenov: "Ideological subversion...is a slow process...to change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that despite the abundance of information, no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interests of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country. It's a great brainwashing process which goes very slow and is divided into four basic stages."

4 stages of Ideological Subversion
1. Demoralization
2. Destabalization
3. Crisis
4. Normalization

Bezmenov: "The demoralization process in the United States is basically completed already. ...

As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who is demoralized is unable to access true information. The facts tell nothing to him. Even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures. Even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union, and show him concentration camps, he will refuse to believe it...when the military boot crashes, then he will understand, but not before that. That is the tragedy of the situation."

More detailed lecture:

Yuri Bezmenov, a.k.a. Tomas Schuman, soviet KGB defector, explains in detail his scheme for the KGB process of subversion and takeover of target societies at a lecture in Los Angeles, 1983.

Yuri Alexandrovitch Bezmenov is a former KGB propagandist who was assigned to New Dehli, India, defected to the West in 1970, and was interviewed by Edward Griffin in 1985. Bezmenov explains his background, some of his training, and exactly how Soviet propaganda is spread in other countries in order to subvert their teachers, politicians, and other policy makers to a mindset receptive to the Soviet ideology.

He also explains in detail the goal of Soviet propaganda as total subversion of another country and the 4 step formula for achieving this goal. He recalls the details of how he escaped India, defected to the West, and settled in Montreal as an announcer for the CBC.

Part III - 2/7, 3/7, 4/7, 5/7, 6/7, 7/7

Part I - 1/2, 2/2

Part IIb - 1/2, 2/2

Part IV - 1/2, 2/2

National Jewish groups oppose new tough anti-illegal immigration law in Arizona

Groups oppose Arizona immigration law

JTA
April 19, 2010

WASHINGTON (JTA) -- Three national Jewish groups urged Arizona's governor to veto a bill that would force local authorities to enforce federal immigration law.

If passed, the bill "would make state and local law enforcement officers' jobs nearly impossible, and would bring us further from, not closer to, the goal we all share of making our communities safer," said the letter sent Monday from the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, the American Jewish Committee and the Jewish Council for Public Affairs to Gov. Jan. Brewer, a Republican. "It would also cause hardship to countless Arizona residents -- U.S. citizens, legal immigrants, and undocumented immigrants alike -- who if this law is passed will live under a cloud of suspicion and fear."

The legislation, which becomes law unless Brewer vetoes it in the next five days, would require police to ask those suspected of being in the country illegally to produce documentation. It also would ban soliciting work from people on sidewalks if it slows traffic.

Brewer has said she has reservations about the bill, which would be the toughest such measure in the country.

Opponents are concerned that it could lead to racial profiling and inhibit undocumented workers from reporting crime.

http://www.jta.org/news/article/2010/04/19/1011661/groups-oppose-ariz-immigration-law

Group of American Jewish leaders to adopt measure to support policy of allowing homosexuals to openly serve in U.S. military

Jewish groups to adopt measure backing gays in military

BY JTA
17/02/2010 10:04

Leaders likely to ask for repeal of US military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy.

NEW YORK - A group of national and local Jewish leaders will likely adopt a resolution next week calling for the repeal of the US military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy on gay and lesbian soldiers.

The resolution, to be brought up Feb. 23 in Dallas at the annual plenum of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, calls the policy an "anomaly" and notes that most Western countries, Israel included, allow gays and lesbians to openly serve in the armed forces.

"The JCPA believes that gay, lesbian, and bisexual personnel should be allowed to openly serve in all branches of the military service subject to the same rules of military conduct that apply to all those who serve openly," the resolution says.

The text goes on to encourage constituents of JCPA -- an umbrella organization bringing together the synagogue movements, national Jewish organizations and local Jewish communities across North America -- to advocate for the policy's repeal and to foster dialogue with those of opposing views.

Rabbi Steve Gutow, the JCPA's executive director, told JTA that he had not encountered any significant opposition to the measure, which he expects to pass.

"I think there became a recognition that this was going to be an issue this year and we wanted to have a stand on it," Gutow said.

Indeed, after a year in which President Obama drew fire for his lack of movement on the issue, the president announced in his State of the Union address in January that he would be seeking a repeal of the law, which was adopted as a compromise measure in 1993. A week later, the country's top two defense officials also called for the law's repeal at a hearing on Capitol Hill.

The leader of the Conservative movement's synagogue arm already has publicly come out against the policy, as has the Reform movement's Religious Action Center.

"We know that sexual orientation is innate, and it cannot be God's will to give gay men and lesbians less dignity than God has given the rest of us," wrote Rabbi Steven Wernick, the executive vice president and CEO of the United Synagogue for Conservative Judaism, in the blog On Faith. "We believe strongly, therefore, that every American citizen, regardless of ethnicity, religion, gender, or sexual orientation, should have the right to serve our country. And no American citizen should have to lie about the person he or she most loves."

Though the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" resolution may be the most publicly controversial issue on the JCPA agenda, Gutow said that most of the council's attention this year will be focused on the efforts to delegitimize Israel and the need to foster civil discourse in the Jewish community. Resolutions will be considered on both subjects.

The JCPA plenum, which runs Feb. 20-23, is expected to draw about 300 participants from 35 communities across the country, in addition to representatives of several national Jewish groups.

Among the scheduled speakers are Israel's ambassador to the United States, Michael Oren, and the State Department envoy on anti-Semitism, Hannah Rosenthal. Oren is slated to address Israeli security, while Rosenthal will join Anti-Defamation League chief Abraham Foxman in a panel discussion on anti-Semitism.

Also on the speakers list is the former Clinton administration housing and urban development secretary, Henry Cisneros, and Kenneth Stein, an Emory University professor who resigned his position at the Carter Center in a protest over the former president's book on the Middle East.

http://www.jpost.com/JewishWorld/JewishNews/Article.aspx?id=168933

Totalitarian Thought Police Enforce Jewish-Satanic Agenda of Race-Mixing, Homosexuality, Atheism, etc for the Destruction of the English People

Thought police muscle up in Britain

The Australian | Hal G. P. Colebatch | April 21, 2009

BRITAIN appears to be evolving into the first modern soft totalitarian state. As a sometime teacher of political science and international law, I do not use the term totalitarian loosely.

There are no concentration camps or gulags but there are thought police with unprecedented powers to dictate ways of thinking and sniff out heresy, and there can be harsh punishments for dissent.

Nikolai Bukharin claimed one of the Bolshevik Revolution's principal tasks was "to alter people's actual psychology". Britain is not Bolshevik, but a campaign to alter people's psychology and create a new Homo britannicus is under way without even a fig leaf of disguise.

The Government is pushing ahead with legislation that will criminalise politically incorrect jokes, with a maximum punishment of up to seven years' prison. The House of Lords tried to insert a free-speech amendment, but Justice Secretary Jack Straw knocked it out. It was Straw who previously called for a redefinition of Englishness and suggested the "global baggage of empire" was linked to soccer violence by "racist and xenophobic white males". He claimed the English "propensity for violence" was used to subjugate Ireland, Scotland and Wales, and that the English as a race were "potentially very aggressive".

In the past 10 years I have collected reports of many instances of draconian punishments, including the arrest and criminal prosecution of children, for thought-crimes and offences against political correctness.

Countryside Restoration Trust chairman and columnist Robin Page said at a rally against the Government's anti-hunting laws in Gloucestershire in 2002: "If you are a black vegetarian Muslim asylum-seeking one-legged lesbian lorry driver, I want the same rights as you." Page was arrested, and after four months he received a letter saying no charges would be pressed, but that: "If further evidence comes to our attention whereby your involvement is implicated, we will seek to initiate proceedings." It took him five years to clear his name.

Page was at least an adult. In September 2006, a 14-year-old schoolgirl, Codie Stott, asked a teacher if she could sit with another group to do a science project as all the girls with her spoke only Urdu. The teacher's first response, according to Stott, was to scream at her: "It's racist, you're going to get done by the police!" Upset and terrified, the schoolgirl went outside to calm down. The teacher called the police and a few days later, presumably after officialdom had thought the matter over, she was arrested and taken to a police station, where she was fingerprinted and photographed. According to her mother, she was placed in a bare cell for 3 1/2 hours. She was questioned on suspicion of committing a racial public order offence and then released without charge. The school was said to be investigating what further action to take, not against the teacher, but against Stott. Headmaster Anthony Edkins reportedly said: "An allegation of a serious nature was made concerning a racially motivated remark. We aim to ensure a caring and tolerant attitude towards pupils of all ethnic backgrounds and will not stand for racism in any form."

A 10-year-old child was arrested and brought before a judge, for having allegedly called an 11-year-old boya "Paki" and "bin Laden" during a playground argument at a primary school (the other boy had called him a skunk and a Teletubby). When it reached the court the case had cost taxpayers pound stg. 25,000. The accused was so distressed that he had stopped attending school. The judge, Jonathan Finestein, said: "Have we really got to the stage where we are prosecuting 10-year-old boys because of political correctness? There are major crimes out there and the police don't bother to prosecute. This is nonsense."

Finestein was fiercely attacked by teaching union leaders, as in those witch-hunt trials where any who spoke in defence of an accused or pointed to defects in the prosecution were immediately targeted as witches and candidates for burning.

Hate-crime police investigated Basil Brush, a puppet fox on children's television, who had made a joke about Gypsies. The BBC confessed that Brush had behaved inappropriately and assured police that the episode would be banned.

A bishop was warned by the police for not having done enough to "celebrate diversity", the enforcing of which is now apparently a police function. A Christian home for retired clergy and religious workers lost a grant because it would not reveal to official snoopers how many of the residents were homosexual. That they had never been asked was taken as evidence of homophobia.

Muslim parents who objected to young children being given books advocating same-sex marriage and adoption at one school last year had their wishes respected and the offending material withdrawn. This year, Muslim and Christian parents at another school objecting to the same material have not only had their objections ignored but have been threatened with prosecution if they withdraw their children.

There have been innumerable cases in recent months of people in schools, hospitals and other institutions losing their jobs because of various religious scruples, often, as in the East Germany of yore, not shouted fanatically from the rooftops but betrayed in private conversations and reported to authorities. The crime of one nurse was to offer to pray for a patient, who did not complain but merely mentioned the matter to another nurse. A primary school receptionist, Jennie Cain, whose five-year-old daughter was told off for talking about Jesus in class, faces the sack for seeking support from her church. A private email from her to other members of the church asking for prayers fell into the hands of school authorities.

Permissiveness as well as draconianism can be deployed to destroy socially accepted norms and values. The Royal Navy, for instance, has installed a satanist chapel in a warship to accommodate the proclivities of a satanist crew member. "What would Nelson have said?" is a British newspaper cliche about navy scandals, but in this case seems a legitimate question. Satanist paraphernalia is also supplied to prison inmates who need it.

This campaign seems to come from unelected or quasi-governmental bodies controlling various institutions, which are more or less unanswerable to electors, more than it does directly from the Government, although the Government helps drive it and condones it in a fudged and deniable manner.

Any one of these incidents might be dismissed as an aberration, but taken together - and I have only mentioned a tiny sample; more are reported almost every day - they add up to a pretty clear picture.

Jews' Newsweek rag froths over the "end of Christian America"

ABOVE: Cover of the latest Newsweek.

The End of Christian America

The percentage of self-identified Christians has fallen 10 points in the past two decades. How that statistic explains who we are now—and what, as a nation, we are about to become.

By Jon Meacham | NEWSWEEK
Published Apr 4, 2009

It was a small detail, a point of comparison buried in the fifth paragraph on the 17th page of a 24-page summary of the 2009 American Religious Identification Survey. But as R. Albert Mohler Jr.—president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, one of the largest on earth—read over the document after its release in March, he was struck by a single sentence. For a believer like Mohler—a starched, unflinchingly conservative Christian, steeped in the theology of his particular province of the faith, devoted to producing ministers who will preach the inerrancy of the Bible and the Gospel of Jesus Christ as the only means to eternal life—the central news of the survey was troubling enough: the number of Americans who claim no religious affiliation has nearly doubled since 1990, rising from 8 to 15 percent. Then came the point he could not get out of his mind: while the unaffiliated have historically been concentrated in the Pacific Northwest, the report said, "this pattern has now changed, and the Northeast emerged in 2008 as the new stronghold of the religiously unidentified." As Mohler saw it, the historic foundation of America's religious culture was cracking.

[...]

Satanic Jewish-controlled UK government: 'Don't teach children right and wrong about sex'

Parents should NOT tell their children what is 'right or wrong' about having sex, say ministers

The Daily Mail | By Steve Doughty | 23rd February 2009

Parents should not tell their young teenage children that it is wrong to have sex, ministers said yesterday.

They should curb their tongues for fear of discouraging youngsters from 'being open', according to a campaign to involve mothers and fathers in sex education.

But, while parents are warned against giving moral guidance, they are encouraged to get their children to use condoms and other contraception from the age of 13.

They should offer to go with their teenagers to their GP or a sex advice clinic to get contraceptives, the advice recommended.

Critics said the advice was misguided and would marginalise the role of parents.

Children's Minister Beverley Hughes said parents should assist teenage children if they are sexually active. 'We want parents to help young people to resist the pressure to have early sex, but also to explain the importance of using contraception if and when they do decide to have sex,' she said.

Officials at the Department for Children, Schools and Families said the minister's advice applies to parents whose children are 13 - three years under the legal age of consent.

The effort to recruit parents to reinforce the Government's failing 'teenage pregnancy strategy' comes as ministers are braced for the release of damning figures on pregnancies among under-18s.

They will show - as disclosed by the Daily Mail in December - that in 2007 the teen pregnancy rate defied Government expectations by going up, not down.


[...]

Patrick Grimm: "The Judaic Mindset and the Jewish Spirit"

Brilliant essay from Grimm. His blog was shut down by Jewish censors not long after this was published. Full article re-published below.zionistwatch.wordpress.com/2008/10/12/the-judaic-mindset-and-the-jewish-spirit/

The Judaic Mindset and the Jewish Spiritby Patrick GrimmOctober 12, 2008

“Who knows what great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you alone. But we did not leave you alone. We took you in hand and pulled down the beautiful and generous structure you had reared, and changed the whole course of your history. We conquered you as no empire of yours ever subjugated Africa or Asia. And we did it all without armies, without bullets, without blood or turmoil, without force of any kind. We did it solely by the irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas, with propaganda.” -Marcus Eli Ravage, A Real Case Against the Jews.

The implementation of the Judaic mindset brings with it a reductionism and a devaluation of all pursuits and it has finally reduced them to nothing more than a hunger and a grasping for profit and aggrandizement. As the Judaic mentality and the Jewish spirit have gained sway, all forms of higher life have been swept aside or crushed altogether. Where profits reign supreme, tradition dies, pragmatism displaces virtue and piety and persons become, not moral actors, but consumers, “eaters” and slaves for the globalist overlords.How has education devolved under the Judaic hand and at the behest of the Jewish spirit? It has been both condensed and fragmented. Education has been ripped away from its Greek and Western moorings. Its purpose has ceased to be one of instilling character, virtue and temperance. The Aristotelian educational philosophy of both studying and understanding virtue and living a virtuous life has been displaced. The important question “How shall we order our lives?” or “What is the specific function of man as a moral actor?” has been substituted by other, more sinister questions. William James’ pragmatism has been wedded with the Jewish profit motive and birthed into an ugly mongrel-like monstrosity. The Jamesian question “But does it work?” has been intertwined and sometimes replaced with the Jewish query “But does it sell?” Thus consumerism, pragmatism and globalism all waltz together in perfect harmony.Jewish dissident Samuel Roth in his book Jews Must Live discussed the proclivity of his people to become doctors and lawyers. Yet he made it quite clear that these professions were not pursued by Jews out of a desire for societal health and wellness or social justice. Roth knew his brethren well. These professions were chosen entirely because they provided both status and wealth. Hence we see the historical distrust of Jewish physicians in antiquity and the contemporary low view most people take of lawyers and of the law both historically and as currently practiced. Thus we have lawyer jokes. This Jewish penchant for choosing a profession based only on money has been disseminated throughout our culture and it has had often damaging results. “Profits Not People” has become the catchphrase of our culture. It is the springboard for globalism. It is the end of protectionism, sovereignty and the nation-state.The Jewish mentality is, not to put too fine a point on it, bent inexorably towards Mammonism (what was once known as greed) and the profit motive. Even the Marxist framework, while supposedly eschewing capitalism and this same profit motive, reduces man to nothing more than an economic actor, with few or any other noticeable dimensions or motivations. When a human being is nothing other than a consumer of goods and services, he becomes, in the eyes of the elite, an “eater”, and his usefulness or uselessness is defined only by the benefits he provides to those at the top of the pyramid.This Judaic paradigm has had pernicious ramifications in myriad areas. It has minimized many values once regarded as “first principles” or crucial bedrocks for crafting a civil society and reduced them to nothing more than pragmatic or economic choices. Radical individualism has bitten down. Take note of the many European-American women, suckled at the teat of Jewish orthodoxy, who, along with their Jewish compatriots, slander and demean traditionalist women, calling them “breeders” and their children “sprogs.” This is undeniably derived from the Judaic mentality that encourages radical individualism among non-Jews. Its effects on the white family have been catastrophic. Our people are dying as they move from societal health to existential death. They imbibe and come to embody the Jewish spirit, the Jewish way of ordering a non-Jewish society. That way leads to oblivion.Once upon a time, before the Judaic Order took its place at the apex of the hierarchy of Western governments, institutions and media, and the Aristotelian considerations of higher purpose, derived from our forebears, still held, however imperfectly, some noble sway, whether implicitly (common man) or explicitly (academicians and intellectuals) amongst our people, we were relatively healthy. Then came the toxins of Jewish thought, which condensed our choices and crumbled our purpose as a society and a people, leaving consumerism, greed and the profit motive to replace community, family and racial solidarity. These toxins were surely helped along by many of our own people, ideologues who truly believed they were working for a better world, the promised utopia written of in the tomes of the tribalists.Some may think these evaluations too harsh, but the verdict is in. The Judaic mindset has, as its coded mantra, the complete destruction of Western civilization and the obliteration of tradition, family and the entire race of European mankind. The slave state envisioned by the Frankfurt School and dutifully written down in the Old Testament Pentateuch of yore, as well as in the book of Isaiah, is coming to pass. The “eaters” will grind on hopelessly and helplessly, their identities, traditions and their pride reduced to nothing. These amnesiacs, somnambulists all, sleepwalk through a world morphed and marred by the Jewish way of ordering things. Malignancies once seen as outrages by those who still recall the Old Order, are now tacitly accepted, sometimes heralded as necessities birthed for the ultimate common good. This is the sad truth of our times.Reductionism and devaluation of every former precept of our people has become the intolerance we are forced to tolerate, all “for fear of the Jews” as we become weak-kneed, equivocating and ceaselessly apologetic. Any defenses once used as checks to arrest this slide into a Judaic dystopia have been whittled down to impotent and “discredited” bigotries and those who suggest revamping or reviving the old concepts of character, virtue and temperance, much less the more virulent and virile attitudes of racial pride, intolerance, traditionalism and meritocracy are practically branded as moral and intellectual criminals.Does the Jewish spirit sell? Most assuredly it does sell, and it has been bought, hook, line and sinker by the majority. It is being packaged and sold to us every minute of every day. Does the Judaic mentality work in any objective sense? It positively does work, to the benefit of the tribalists and only the tribalists. Their ideas, now implemented and rammed into place by the once mediating institutions, those institutions that once worked for the nourishment and uplift of our people, now serve to nourish only the Judaic profiteers and the globalist overlords, whose only profit comes at our expense and at the cost of our existence. Our education system, our media and our government now work only for these Jewish ends.Dear friends, we are no longer the moral actors grappling with lofty notions of virtue and right and wrong as we reach back to take hold of the philosophical treasures bequeathed to us. We have becomes the low men and women, the slaves, the “eaters” and the frivolous consumers that the Jewish power configuration long imagined us to be when they determined to smash our highest ideals. We hunger not for that which has made us strong and prosperous in the past, but only for the “bread and circuses” and the pseudo-images placed before our hollow eyes. If there are no sadder words than “what might have been” then we are truly the saddest souls of all.

Patrick Grimm: "What is at Stake is Beauty""Anti-Jewish Sentiments" by Patrick GrimmPatrick Grimm: It all boils down to the Jewish usurious banking racket

Khazar cockroach Sarkozy: "Arabic is the language of the future"

As I recall, Sarkozy ran for President on a somewhat nationalist and anti-immigration platform. Now in classic Jewish political bait-and-switch style, he's doing a 180 -- much like George W. Bush who talked tough on illegal immigration prior to being elected, but once in office supports amnesty for illegals.While this hideous Zionist scumbag promotes the Third World invasion and takeover of France in order to further the Jewish Agenda of genocide of the white race through race-mixing and destruction of the powerful western nations -- would he advocate similar "diversity", "tolerance", and mass muslim immigration for the Talmudic/Zionist state of "Israel"? http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3591

Sarkozy: “Arabic Is the Language of the Future"The Brussels Journal14 Oct 2008 The French government is strongly advocating the teaching of Arabic language and civilization in French schools. Not surprising, considering the number of Arabs and Muslims in France, and the unctuous deference with which they are treated by officials, beginning notably with Nicolas Sarkozy, who cannot praise enough the splendor of Arabic contributions to the world.The French National Assembly was the scene of a meeting earlier this month of the first Conference on the Teaching of Arabic Language and Culture, attended by a variety of interested parties. There was much wearisome blather about the need for "dialogue."In his message to the participants, French President Nicolas Sarkozy called Arabic the "language of the future, of science and of modernity," and expressed the hope that "more French people share in the language that expresses great civilizational and spiritual values.""We must invest in the Arabic language (because) to teach it symbolizes a moment of exchange, of openness and of tolerance, (and it) brings with it one of the oldest and most prestigious civilizations of the world. It is in France that we have the greatest number of persons of Arabic and Muslim origin. Islam is the second religion of France," Sarkozy reminded his listeners.He proceeded to enumerate the various "advances in terms of diversity," the increase in Muslim sections of cemeteries, the training of imams and chaplains and the appointments of ministers of diverse backgrounds.

Jewish Professor & Quarterly Magazine Admit and Brag Jewish Dominated Porn Industry Designed to Subvert and Destroy White Western Christian Culture

I remember reading this article a few years ago. Thanks to this blogger for brining it to my attention again.

Nathan Abrams on Jews in the American porn industryNathan Abrams Winter 2004 - Number 196Jewish QuarterlyA story little told is that of Jews in Hollywood’s seedier cousin, the adult film industry. Perhaps we’d prefer to pretend that the ‘triple-exthnics’ didn’t exist, but there’s no getting away from the fact that secular Jews have played (and still continue to play) a disproportionate role throughout the adult film industry in America. Jewish involvement in pornography has a long history in the United States, as Jews have helped to transform a fringe subculture into what has become a primary constituent of Americana. These are the ‘true blue Jews’.Smut peddlersJewish activity in the porn industry divides into two (sometimes overlapping) groups: pornographers and performers. Though Jews make up only two per cent of the American population, they have been prominent in pornography. Many erotica dealers in the book trade between 1890 and 1940 were immigrant Jews of German origin.[...]According to one anonymous industry insider quoted by E. Michael Jones in the magazine Culture Wars (May 2003), ‘the leading male performers through the 1980s came from secular Jewish upbringings and the females from Roman Catholic day schools’. The standard porn scenario became as a result a Jewish fantasy of schtupping the Catholic shiksa.[...]Extending the subversive thesis, Jewish involvement in the X-rated industry can be seen as a proverbial two fingers to the entire WASP establishment in America. Some porn stars viewed themselves as frontline fighters in the spiritual battle between Christian America and secular humanism. According to Ford, Jewish X-rated actors often brag about their ‘joy in being anarchic, sexual gadflies to the puritanical beast’. Jewish involvement in porn, by this argument, is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion. Astyr remembers having ‘to run or fight for it in grammar school because I was a Jew. It could very well be that part of my porn career is an “up yours” to these people’. Al Goldstein, the publisher of Screw, said (on lukeford.net), ‘The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don’t believe in authoritarianism.’ Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture and, as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream (and is no doubt consumed by those very same WASPs), its subversive character becomes more charged.[...]It is a case of the traditional revolutionary/radical drive of immigrant Jews in America being channelled into sexual rather than leftist politics. Just as Jews have been disproportionately represented in radical movements over the years, so they are also disproportionately represented in the porn industry. Jews in America have been sexual revolutionaries. A large amount of the material on sexual liberation was written by Jews. Those at the forefront of the movement which forced America to adopt a more liberal view of sex were Jewish. Jews were also at the vanguard of the sexual revolution of the 1960s. Wilhelm Reich, Herbert Marcuse and Paul Goodman replaced Marx, Trotsky and Lenin as required revolutionary reading. Reich’s central preoccupations were work, love and sex, while Marcuse prophesied that a socialist utopia would free individuals to achieve sexual satisfaction. Goodman wrote of the ‘beautiful cultural consequences’ that would follow from legalizing pornography: it would ‘ennoble all our art’ and ‘humanize sexuality’. Pacheco was one Jewish porn star who read Reich’s intellectual marriage of Freud and Marx.[...]What are we ashamed of?This brief overview and analysis of the role and motivations behind pornographers and performers is intended to shed light on a neglected topic in American Jewish popular culture. Little has been written about it. Books such as Howard M. Sachar’s A History of the Jews in America (New York: Knopf, 1992) simply ignore the topic. And you can bet that the 350th anniversary of the arrival of the Jews in the United States did not include any celebrations of Jewish innovation in this field. Even the usually tolerant Time Out New York has been too prim to deal with it, although the more iconoclastic Heeb plans an issue on it. In light of the relatively tolerant Jewish view of sex, why are we ashamed of the Jewish role in the porn industry? We might not like it, but the Jewish role in this field has been significant and it is about time it was written about seriously.

http://www.jewishquarterly.org/article.asp?articleid=38